kristin,
thanks for the question.
The most recent task force on hypertension has stessed the importance of the early detection and aggressive management of hypertension to try to further prevent those suffering from hypertension related complications such as kidney disease, heart attack, and stroke.
Some of the most important aspects of their conclusions included "relationship between blood
pressurePressure ulcer and risk of cardiovascular disease events is continuous, consistent, and independent of other risk
factorsFactor ix complex,” and “The higher the blood
pressurePressure ulcer, the greater the chance of heart attack, heart failure, stroke, and kidney disease.”
The new guidlines involve 4 new strategies:
1) Reclassification of hypertension to recognize those at risk earlier, given the linear relationship. Thus in answer to your question: People with a
systolicBlood pressure
Mitral valve prolapse blood pressure of 120-139 and diastolic blood pressure of 80-89 should be considered prehypertensive. They should undergo aggressive risk factor modification to attemt to lower their blood pressure. Those above that should be considered hypertensive.
2) Systolic hypertension is very important in those over 50 and should be treated aggressiveley.
3) Most people will need more then 1 drug to control their blood pressure.
4) Physicians and patients need to realize the importance of aggressive control of blood pressure and work to gether to maintain this goal.
hope this helps.
good luck
I'm 46 years old, female, tentatively diagnosed with Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia (holter AVERAGE heartrate was 115, but went up to 160s & 170s when exercising & down to 77). Noticed resting heart rate was 100s-110s for the past 6 months & rises rapidly with very little exertion. I am fit, "ideal weight for height, in excellent health but have severe emphysema & severe chronic asthma (both of which are well controlled via medications).
Aloha,
Starion
We are considering doing a repeat holter monitoring test without several of my lung meds to see how that affects my heart rate.
Aloha,
Starion
that this is suggested for PVC/PACs however it was stated that
it should be taken along with a similar amount of calcium as
one compliments the other. Any opinion? Do you take it with meals and at what time of the day?
As a newcomer to this site with a history of arrhythemias I want to express my appreciation and thanks for everyone's advice and
sharing on this perplexing subject
Its always interesting to follow your comments. I have similar problem of BP control. Was on Cozaar also but throat side effects caused a halt. Also tried atenolol first 50mg then 25 but again side effects (irregular beats). Doc. attempted to put me on Cardizem and later Verapamil but an EP suggested not to. Finally the GP recommended Diovan 80mg and it is lowering BP but also with some throat side effects (hoarseness and some swallowing difficulty). However being diabetic with LVH he insists on the Diovan. After your comments on LVH, I would really like to control the BP to the recommended 130/80 (my systolic is major problem always around 140). I also have PACs/PVCs and am constantly aware of my heart beat. Do you ever get any side effects with Cozaar and you think it wise to just ignore such? It seems that most BP must now be controlled by at least 2 medications. Given my situation what other med. could be added to the Diovan? Like you said it may take some trial and error but I would like to get the right combo that works for me. Hope I have not extended my questions but will highly appreciate your valuable comments. I live in the Caribbean also (USVI)but have problems posting questions.
Thanks,
Chris R.
what does "BORDERLINE ECG" means ?
I'm 60 Years old
Rate 65 - Normal sinus rhythm rate 65 Normal P axis, PR, rate & rhythm
PR 143 - ST > .15 mV I, aVL,V2-V6
QRSD 70
QT 389
QTc 404
--AXIS--
P 55
QRS 39
T 32
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME IF THIS ECG IS NORMAL?
THANK YOU SOOOOOO MUCH!!
OSI