Heart Disease Community
Which would be safer?
About This Community:

This patient support community is for discussions relating to angina, angioplasty, arrhythmia, bypass surgery, cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease, defibrillator, heart attack, heart disease, mitral valve, pacemaker, PAD, stenosis, and stress tests.

Font Size:
A
A
A
Background:
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank Blank

Which would be safer?

In your opinion, do you think it would be safe to remove one kidney that is functioning 0% and leave someone with the other kidney that is only functioning 70% that needs microvalve surgery as well or do you think it's safer to wait and do both surgeries at the same time to give them a better chance of having the good kidney stronger from the repair so it can do the job of both rather than risking the possibility of it failing as well and putting her in greater danger than she was at the beginning.
Related Discussions
2 Comments Post a Comment
Blank
976897_tn?1379171202
That is a very difficult question and one which would really require a lot more information to answer, such as the general condition of the patient especially lung function and heart condition. However if one had to look at this based on logic alone and taking it the patient is healthy in all other aspects I would look at it this way....

If one kidney has failed it has no use at all, even if the good kidney fails, the dead one will have no use.
The good kidney is working at 70% and requires surgery. I am not sure whether 70% of
kidney function is enough for the body as I know little about them, but it doesn't sound like it is. So, surgery is necessary. Each time a patient is put under general anaesthetic they are put at risk and post surgery there is always a risk of infection.

To me this is a bit like saying "you need a triple bypass but we will graft on vessel today, then next month we will open you up again to graft the second and the month after that we will open you up again to graft the third. We feel this is necessary to ensure each vessel has time to adapt".

I would have both kidneys done at the same time because one is just a removal. Whether removed or not, it is not going to help anyway.
Blank
Post a Comment
To
Top Heart Disease Answerers
976897_tn?1379171202
Blank
ed34
watford, United Kingdom
63984_tn?1385441539
Blank
Flycaster305
97303, OR
Avatar_f_tn
Blank
skydnsr
159619_tn?1318997813
Blank
erijon
Salt Lake City, UT
329165_tn?1412685860
Blank
Smiley2000
Australia
Avatar_m_tn
Blank
Occupant
IL
MedHelp Health Answers
Blank
BloodPressure Tracker
Monitor Your Blood Pressure
Start Tracking Now
Blank
HeartRhythm Tracker
Track your Heart Condition
Start Tracking Now
Recent Activity
Avatar_m_tn
Blank
Paxiled commented on Important Factors Typ...
1 hr ago
Avatar_n_tn
Blank
MickDamphousse commented on When Your Cold Is Not...
17 hrs ago
Avatar_m_tn
Blank
Valkry commented on Important Factors Typ...
Oct 23
Heart Disease Community Resources
RSS Expert Activity
469720_tn?1388149949
Blank
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm-treatable... Blank
Oct 04 by Lee Kirksey, MDBlank
242532_tn?1269553979
Blank
The 3 Essentials to Ending Emotiona...
Sep 18 by Roger Gould, M.D.Blank
242532_tn?1269553979
Blank
Control Emotional Eating with this ...
Sep 04 by Roger Gould, M.D.Blank
Top Heart Disease Answerers
976897_tn?1379171202
Blank
ed34
watford, United Kingdom
63984_tn?1385441539
Blank
Flycaster305
97303, OR
Avatar_f_tn
Blank
skydnsr
159619_tn?1318997813
Blank
erijon
Salt Lake City, UT
329165_tn?1412685860
Blank
Smiley2000
Australia
Avatar_m_tn
Blank
Occupant
IL