Heart Disease Community
Why does EF vary from test to test?
About This Community:

Join others with Heart Disease and get guidance and support. Ask a question, join a conversation, share experiences.

Font Size:
A
A
A
Background:
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank Blank

Why does EF vary from test to test?

I recently got my records from my cardiologist, and I was looking over all my test results.  I noticed that my EF is different on every test.  I had 2 echoes, stress echo and a nuclear stress echo and none of them have the same EF.  Is one test better than the other in determining my EF.  I understand that they are estimated but there is almost a 20% difference between 2 of the tests.  Which one do I go by?  Just curious....thanks!
Related Discussions
3 Comments Post a Comment
Blank
367994 tn?1304957193
As you know EF is a measurement of the heart's pumping output in VOLUME with each stroke. The heart chambers' size is not rigid (unless hypertrohic, etc.)  but elastic and varies in dimension (LV volume capacity) to maintain a compensatory balance between the right and left chambers when there is not a dysfunctional system.

To better understand,  there is a similar test called fractional shortening (FS).  Rather than measure by VOLUME it is a measurement of the relationship between the maximum dimensions during diastole and then systole recorded with the an echo.  FS measures contractility (estimation).  It is calculated by the difference of end diastolic dimension and end systolic dimension and then divided by end diastolic dimension.  Normal range is 18 to 42%.

When end diastole is increased there are stronger contractions (Frank/Starling law of physics), but over stretched the will be a loss of contractility (dilated left ventricle).  When there is hypertrophy the muscle growth crowds out filling capacitiy and as well as stiffness affects contractions.

To answer your question which is the best to measure EF, I would say the echo.  Because the measurement is taken when the heart is/should be at a slower heart rate.  I watched the tech and he pointed and remarked on the procedure while testing, and it is apparant the border of the chambers are fuzzy because of the heart wall movement and the tech attempts (estimates) to outline border with a transducer.  A faster heart rate would be more difficult to measure and less accurate.  My opinion.

Blank
Post a Comment
To
Top Heart Disease Answerers
159619 tn?1318997813
Blank
Salt Lake City, UT
11548417 tn?1440481484
Blank
Netherlands
Avatar universal
Blank
Avatar universal
Blank
Avatar universal
Blank
Ireland
144586 tn?1284669764
Blank
Blank
BloodPressure Tracker
Monitor Your Blood Pressure
Start Tracking Now
Blank
HeartRhythm Tracker
Track your Heart Condition
Start Tracking Now
Recent Activity
1236893 tn?1408490528
Blank
Medium-chain triglycerides
3 hrs ago by gymdandee
463897 tn?1448485050
Blank
MH Community Mgr is enjoying warm weather th... Comment
May 23
463897 tn?1448485050
Blank
MH Community Mgr commented on Des_a_rae's status
May 23
Heart Disease Community Resources
RSS Expert Activity
233488 tn?1310696703
Blank
Marathon Running Done Over Many Yea...
05/15 by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS, FAAOBlank
233488 tn?1310696703
Blank
New Article on Multifocal IOL vs &q...
05/15 by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS, FAAOBlank
748543 tn?1463449675
Blank
TMJ/TMJ The Connection Between Teet...
01/15 by Hamidreza Nassery , DMD, FICOI, FAGD, FICCMOBlank
Top Heart Disease Answerers
159619 tn?1318997813
Blank
Salt Lake City, UT
11548417 tn?1440481484
Blank
Netherlands
Avatar universal
Blank
Avatar universal
Blank
Avatar universal
Blank
Ireland
144586 tn?1284669764
Blank