I recently got my records from my cardiologist, and I was looking over all my test results. I noticed that my EF is different on every test. I had 2 echoes, stress echo and a nuclear stress echo and none of them have the same EF. Is one test better than the other in determining my EF. I understand that they are estimated but there is almost a 20% difference between 2 of the tests. Which one do I go by? Just curious....thanks!
As you know EF is a measurement of the heart's pumping output in VOLUME with each stroke. The heart chambers' size is not rigid (unless hypertrohic, etc.) but elastic and varies in dimension (LV volume capacity) to maintain a compensatory balance between the right and left chambers when there is not a dysfunctional system.
To better understand, there is a similar test called fractional shortening (FS). Rather than measure by VOLUME it is a measurement of the relationship between the maximum dimensions during diastole and then systole recorded with the an echo. FS measures contractility (estimation). It is calculated by the difference of end diastolic dimension and end systolic dimension and then divided by end diastolic dimension. Normal range is 18 to 42%.
When end diastole is increased there are stronger contractions (Frank/Starling law of physics), but over stretched the will be a loss of contractility (dilated left ventricle). When there is hypertrophy the muscle growth crowds out filling capacitiy and as well as stiffness affects contractions.
To answer your question which is the best to measure EF, I would say the echo. Because the measurement is taken when the heart is/should be at a slower heart rate. I watched the tech and he pointed and remarked on the procedure while testing, and it is apparant the border of the chambers are fuzzy because of the heart wall movement and the tech attempts (estimates) to outline border with a transducer. A faster heart rate would be more difficult to measure and less accurate. My opinion.
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.