Heart Disease Community
Why does EF vary from test to test?
About This Community:

This patient support community is for discussions relating to angina, angioplasty, arrhythmia, bypass surgery, cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease, defibrillator, heart attack, heart disease, mitral valve, pacemaker, PAD, stenosis, and stress tests.

Font Size:
A
A
A
Background:
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank Blank

Why does EF vary from test to test?

I recently got my records from my cardiologist, and I was looking over all my test results.  I noticed that my EF is different on every test.  I had 2 echoes, stress echo and a nuclear stress echo and none of them have the same EF.  Is one test better than the other in determining my EF.  I understand that they are estimated but there is almost a 20% difference between 2 of the tests.  Which one do I go by?  Just curious....thanks!
Related Discussions
3 Comments Post a Comment
Blank
367994_tn?1304957193
As you know EF is a measurement of the heart's pumping output in VOLUME with each stroke. The heart chambers' size is not rigid (unless hypertrohic, etc.)  but elastic and varies in dimension (LV volume capacity) to maintain a compensatory balance between the right and left chambers when there is not a dysfunctional system.

To better understand,  there is a similar test called fractional shortening (FS).  Rather than measure by VOLUME it is a measurement of the relationship between the maximum dimensions during diastole and then systole recorded with the an echo.  FS measures contractility (estimation).  It is calculated by the difference of end diastolic dimension and end systolic dimension and then divided by end diastolic dimension.  Normal range is 18 to 42%.

When end diastole is increased there are stronger contractions (Frank/Starling law of physics), but over stretched the will be a loss of contractility (dilated left ventricle).  When there is hypertrophy the muscle growth crowds out filling capacitiy and as well as stiffness affects contractions.

To answer your question which is the best to measure EF, I would say the echo.  Because the measurement is taken when the heart is/should be at a slower heart rate.  I watched the tech and he pointed and remarked on the procedure while testing, and it is apparant the border of the chambers are fuzzy because of the heart wall movement and the tech attempts (estimates) to outline border with a transducer.  A faster heart rate would be more difficult to measure and less accurate.  My opinion.

Blank
Post a Comment
To
Top Heart Disease Answerers
63984_tn?1385441539
Blank
Flycaster305
97303, OR
976897_tn?1379171202
Blank
ed34
watford, United Kingdom
159619_tn?1318997813
Blank
erijon
Salt Lake City, UT
Avatar_f_tn
Blank
skydnsr
212161_tn?1410016711
Blank
heartfluttersflyawayplz
hoschton, GA
329165_tn?1412685860
Blank
Smiley2000
Australia
MedHelp Health Answers
Blank
BloodPressure Tracker
Monitor Your Blood Pressure
Start Tracking Now
Blank
HeartRhythm Tracker
Track your Heart Condition
Start Tracking Now
Recent Activity
900662_tn?1380159390
Blank
johnniebear burrrr. Im so not ready fo... Comment
19 mins ago
996946_tn?1416866031
Blank
LindaTX your status is too long (ma... Comment
42 mins ago
1236893_tn?1408490528
Blank
gymdandee commented on U.S. Foods Banned in ...
4 hrs ago
Heart Disease Community Resources
RSS Expert Activity
469720_tn?1388149949
Blank
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm-treatable... Blank
Oct 04 by Lee Kirksey, MDBlank
242532_tn?1269553979
Blank
The 3 Essentials to Ending Emotiona...
Sep 18 by Roger Gould, M.D.Blank
242532_tn?1269553979
Blank
Control Emotional Eating with this ...
Sep 04 by Roger Gould, M.D.Blank
Top Heart Disease Answerers
63984_tn?1385441539
Blank
Flycaster305
97303, OR
976897_tn?1379171202
Blank
ed34
watford, United Kingdom
159619_tn?1318997813
Blank
erijon
Salt Lake City, UT
Avatar_f_tn
Blank
skydnsr
212161_tn?1410016711
Blank
heartfluttersflyawayplz
hoschton, GA
329165_tn?1412685860
Blank
Smiley2000
Australia