After my dad (45 year smoker) underwent triple bypass and was diagnosed with CHF and 20% EF (he seems to be recovering well)...I decided to review my prior cardiac records, because I am without question a hypacondriac. I had a lone episode of paryoxsimal A-Fib in July 2006 and have mild MR...have always been told that echos reveal a structurally normal heart. EF has ranged from 55% to 67% on several echos between March 2006 and November 2007.
At any rate, I reviewed some echo readings from November 2006 and May 2007 today and noticed that while my systolic and dystolic functions are in normal ranges, my IVSd went from 1.1 to 1.3 and my LV posterior wall measurement went from 1.0 to 1.1. I realize these findings are normal to only slightly abnormal...but how concerned should I be about this progressing...how bad could it have gotten since 2007.
Your LVPW is within the normal range of 0.6 - 1.1.
Your intraventricular sepum (wall that separates the left and right ventricle) is mildly increased in thickness, however, it is within the the margin of error of 0.1 cm, and there can be benign wall motion artifacts and/or variations in operator images....and it is an estimate!
Your EF is well within the normal range indicating the heart wall motion has no impairment and is functioning well in the pumping phase. We know that if the heart wall sizes increase this can reduce the blood filling (smaller capicity) in the left ventrical chamber and if and when the enlarged walls thicken, the thickened wall(s) do not stretch/well very well and that also reduces filling capacity. I'm providing a perspective for worst case scenario, and your report does not indicate any problem.
You shouldn't be concerned, but it is wise to consider any genetic connection and watch for any irregularities. Thank you for sharing, and if you have any further questions or comments you are welcome to respond. Take care,
Protocol for heart patients or an assessment of an effective heart's functionality would be to consider the heart wall dimensions. And on subsequent tests there should be a reference to prior tests. Consideration may include whether the increased or decreased size are within a margin of error, etc. and of no concern.
"I don't see LV measurements for that test." I don't know if I answered your question because there should be measurements shown on the report...Howevrt, sometimes there is a stress test with just an EKG and wall dimensions are not provided. The test is a perfusion test that observes blood flow and looking for any blockages.
Copyright 1994-2016 MedHelp International. All rights reserved.
MedHelp is a division of Aptus Health.
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.