Heart Disease Community
hypertorphy
About This Community:

This patient support community is for discussions relating to angina, angioplasty, arrhythmia, bypass surgery, cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease, defibrillator, heart attack, heart disease, mitral valve, pacemaker, PAD, stenosis, and stress tests.

Font Size:
A
A
A
Background:
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank Blank

hypertorphy

After my dad (45 year smoker) underwent triple bypass and was diagnosed with CHF and 20% EF (he seems to be recovering well)...I decided to review my prior cardiac records, because I am without question a hypacondriac. I had a lone episode of paryoxsimal A-Fib in July 2006 and have mild MR...have always been told that echos reveal a structurally normal heart. EF has ranged from 55% to 67% on several echos between March 2006 and November 2007.

At any rate, I reviewed some echo readings from November 2006 and May 2007 today and noticed that while my systolic and dystolic functions are in normal ranges, my IVSd went from 1.1 to 1.3 and my LV posterior wall measurement went from 1.0 to 1.1.  I realize these findings are normal to only slightly abnormal...but how concerned should I be about this progressing...how bad could it have gotten since 2007.  
Related Discussions
  • Echocardiogram results (25 replies):
    My results for my echocardiogram were Mild LV diastolic ...[more]
  • Mr (4 replies):
    I have thickened heart walls. My central heart wall is 1...[more]
  • Echo results (27 replies):
    In 2004 I had an echocardiogram. It said the following: ...[more]
  • lvh (16 replies):
    my son is 24 and a strenght trainor no steriods. he was ...[more]
  • echocardiogram findings (1 replies):
    hi, please help me understand echo stress test findings...[more]
8 Comments Post a Comment
Blank
367994_tn?1304957193
Your LVPW is within the normal range of 0.6 - 1.1.  

Your intraventricular sepum (wall that separates the left and right ventricle) is mildly increased in thickness, however, it is within the the margin of error of 0.1 cm, and there can be benign wall motion artifacts and/or variations in operator images....and it is an estimate!  

Your EF is well within the normal range indicating the heart wall motion has no impairment and is functioning well in the pumping phase. We know that if the heart wall sizes increase this can reduce the blood filling (smaller capicity) in the left ventrical chamber and if and when the enlarged walls thicken, the thickened wall(s) do not stretch/well very well and that also reduces filling capacity.  I'm providing a perspective for worst case scenario, and your report does not indicate any problem.

You shouldn't be concerned, but it is wise to consider any genetic connection and watch for any irregularities.  Thank you for sharing, and if you have any further questions or comments you are welcome to respond.  Take care,

Ken

Blank
Avatar_m_tn
Thanks Ken. Very helpful info.

Couple additional questions.

I had an additional stress echo in nov 2007. I don't see LV measurements for that test. If there were changes at that time would the reviewing physician have looked at that.

Also. I exercise regularly without incident. Any concerns about that.

Thanks so much.
Blank
367994_tn?1304957193
Protocol for heart patients or an assessment of an effective heart's functionality would be to consider the heart wall dimensions. And on subsequent tests there should be a reference to prior tests.  Consideration may include whether the increased or decreased size are within a margin of error, etc. and of no concern.

"I don't see LV measurements for that test." I don't know if I answered your question because there should be measurements shown on the report...Howevrt, sometimes there is a stress test with just an EKG and wall dimensions are not provided.  The test is a perfusion test that observes blood flow and looking for any blockages.

Ken
Blank
Avatar_m_tn
Ken,

The readings on the Nov. 2007 stress echo (the last of 5 echos I had between March 2006 and Nov. 2007) stated...

Volume 86 ml [1]

EDV 95 ml [8]

ESV 31 ml [4]

EF 67%

then in  another box of numbers below it says

Chamber 71 ml
Wall 161 ml
Defect 0 ml

I guess my concern is that I've been exercising pretty regularly since this Nov. 2007 test and want to make sure I have not been inducing (for lack of a better word) LVH. Does that make sense.

Can you have normal response to exercise with poor dystolic or systolic function? My understanding is that you can have normal exercise response with LVH by itself.

Thanks for all of your good insight.
Best.
Blank
Post a Comment
To
Top Heart Disease Answerers
976897_tn?1379171202
Blank
ed34
watford, United Kingdom
159619_tn?1318997813
Blank
erijon
Salt Lake City, UT
63984_tn?1385441539
Blank
Flycaster305
97303, OR
612551_tn?1247839157
Blank
Jerry_NJ
NJ
Avatar_f_tn
Blank
skydnsr
212161_tn?1391090750
Blank
heartfluttersflyawayplz
hoschton, GA
MedHelp Health Answers
Blank
BloodPressure Tracker
Monitor Your Blood Pressure
Start Tracking Now
Blank
HeartRhythm Tracker
Track your Heart Condition
Start Tracking Now
Recent Activity
1755089_tn?1376057155
Blank
drewlevas uploaded new photos
10 hrs ago
Avatar_m_tn
Blank
jave123 added the Heart Rhythm Tracker
22 hrs ago
Avatar_m_tn
Blank
keltan commented on Attention All Mouth B...
Aug 22
Heart Disease Community Resources
RSS Expert Activity
233488_tn?1310696703
Blank
New Cannabis Article from NORTH Mag...
Jul 20 by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS, FAAOBlank
242532_tn?1269553979
Blank
3 Reasons Why You are Still Binge E...
Jul 14 by Roger Gould, M.D.Blank
242532_tn?1269553979
Blank
Emotional Eating: What Your Closet ...
Jul 09 by Roger Gould, M.D.Blank
Top Heart Disease Answerers
976897_tn?1379171202
Blank
ed34
watford, United Kingdom
159619_tn?1318997813
Blank
erijon
Salt Lake City, UT
63984_tn?1385441539
Blank
Flycaster305
97303, OR
612551_tn?1247839157
Blank
Jerry_NJ
NJ
Avatar_f_tn
Blank
skydnsr
212161_tn?1391090750
Blank
heartfluttersflyawayplz
hoschton, GA