Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum. ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
Heart Disease (Expert Forum)
measuring the aortic root
This forum is for questions and support regarding heart issues such as: Angina, Angioplasty, Arrhythmia, Bypass Surgery, Cardiomyopathy, Coronary Artery Disease, Defibrillator, Heart Attack, Heart Disease, High Blood Pressure, Mitral Valve Prolapse, Pacemaker, PAD, Stenosis, Stress Tests.
measuring the aortic root
by motley, Sep 07, 2004 12:00AM
Thanks for answering my questions. I have been diagnosed with Ehlers-Danlos(hypermobile, not vascular). In the past year I have had a cardiac MRA to check for aortic root enlargment and a cardiac echo. On the MRA my aortic root was measured at 3.7 cm with mild anulo aortic ectasia. Can you explain what the ectasia means? Also, the echo done after the MRA was read as "poor quality but an attempt was made to measure the aortic root" and it was read at 2.7cm. Which is a more accurate way to measure the aortic root and what would you recommend for follow-up study? I am a 43 y.o female, 5'6",125 lb. Also, I have MVP with regurgitation.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Doctor's Answer
by CCF-M.D.-MJM, Sep 07, 2004 12:00AM
Hi Motley,
By anulo aortic ectasia they are referring to dilation or bulging at the base of the aorta as it connects to the heart.
I can't interpret the discrepancy between the echo and MRI without seeing the study, although calling the MRI a poor study suggests the pictures may not be as clear as they should. Typically either modality provides a pretty clear image of the aorta. MRIs provide 3-dimensional information that is sometimes helpful but the aorta is appropriately followed by either an MRI or an echo.
Honestly the more important thing here is a rate of change between studies. They just need to pick one and repeat it over time following for changes.
Good luck.
By anulo aortic ectasia they are referring to dilation or bulging at the base of the aorta as it connects to the heart.
I can't interpret the discrepancy between the echo and MRI without seeing the study, although calling the MRI a poor study suggests the pictures may not be as clear as they should. Typically either modality provides a pretty clear image of the aorta. MRIs provide 3-dimensional information that is sometimes helpful but the aorta is appropriately followed by either an MRI or an echo.
Honestly the more important thing here is a rate of change between studies. They just need to pick one and repeat it over time following for changes.
Good luck.
You may be interested in the following web site, which provides information about diagnostic testing used to measure the aorta.
http://www.bicuspidfoundation.com
Best Wishes!