HEART DISEASE COMMUNITY
mild Inferior Ischemia

mild Inferior Ischemia

I had recently my Stress test and ECHO done and ECHO was normail I could also get to my 83% of heart rate in 13.5 mins. but however the isotop test showed the following,
Abnormal SPECT perfusion study suggestive of a medium region of mild ingerior ischemia with a summed difference score of 3
Normal left venticular systolic funtion with an EF of 53%.
the basilar two thirds of the inferior wall is equivocal for ischemia. the remaining wall segments demonstrate normal perfusion.

I am 45 yrs of age and normally do a spinning call or tread mill for around an hour every other day.

what could this mean and do i need to see a cardiologist immediately

thank you
Related Discussions
7 Comments Post a Comment
Blank
367994_tn?1304957193
According to the perfusion test, there may be some blockage (ischemia) to the locations indicated.  Your heart's pumping ability is good (EF...ejection fraction..the amount of blood pumped with each heartbeat.  Normal is 50 to 70%)  

Whether to see a cardiologist would depend on whether or not you have angina (chest pain), shortness of breath, etc. and you indicate you don't.  What have been your medical complaints and what are dotors trying to diagnose if you know?
Blank
Avatar_m_tn
I had gone for a physical when my doctor suggested for a stress test and ECHO just to make sure i am in good health. the results are as under
Abnormal Stress ECG which si positive for ischemia however the specificity is decreased due to abnormal baseline ST changes
Abnormal SPECT perfusion study suggestive of a medium region of mild inferior ischemia with a summed difference of 3. Normal left ventericular systolic function with an EF of 53%. Based on the nucleaer data, tehn near term rish for a cardiac event is intermediate.

Also On Bruce protocal I was able to achieve an estimated work load of 14.8MET's
how big a risk is this do I need to get a cath done or should i start some kind of medication
Blank
367994_tn?1304957193
For some insight on Bruce portocol:

An exercise capacity of 5 METs or less is associated with a poor prognosis in subjects less than 65 years old. An exercise capacity of 13 METs indicates a good prognosis despite abnormal exercise test responses.

Metabolic Equivalents (METs) for Maximum Exercise

1 MET = resting
2 METs = level walking at 2 mph
4 METs = level walking at 4 mph
5 METs = poor prognosis; usual limit immediately after MI; peak cost of basic activities of daily living
10 METs = prognosis with medical therapy as good as coronary artery bypass surgery
13 METs = excellent prognosis regardless of other exercise responses
18 METs = elite endurance athletes
20 METs = world class athletes•Bronchospasm

•Severe chest pain associated with ECG changes (>2 mm ST depression or any ST elevation in a non–Q-wave lead):

I can't comment on your doctor's recommendation for a cath.  You seem to have a strong cardiovascular system!!!  
Blank
Post a Comment
To
Comment
Post A Comment
Go
Blank
Heart Rhythm Tracker
Log your arrhythmias
Start Tracking Now
Blank
Cholesterol Tracker
Log cholesterol over time
Start Tracking Now
MedHelp Health Answers
Submit
Top Heart Disease Answerers
976897_tn?1317787410
Blank
ed34
watford, United Kingdom
159619_tn?1318997813
Blank
erijon
Salt Lake City, UT
63984_tn?1333142839
Blank
Flycaster305
OR
187666_tn?1331176945
Blank
ireneo
Portland, OR
237039_tn?1264261657
Blank
ChatterAlly
Lake Jackson, TX
1124887_tn?1313758491
Blank
is_something_wrong
Oslo, Norway
RSS Expert Activity
1741471_tn?1336957856
Blank
LIVE WEBINAR TOMORROW!-SUPER BODY, ... Blank
May 22 by Michael Gonzalez-WallaceBlank
2126606_tn?1335910182
Blank
Fibromyalgia Awareness
May 11 by Clare Waismann Kavin, RASBlank
2126606_tn?1335910182
Blank
Opioid-induced hyperalgesia reduces...
May 03 by Clare Waismann Kavin, RASBlank