On 11/8/2008 I had a PVI ablation for a-fib. I am a 55 year old male with no heart damage. I had had a-fib episodes for nearly 20 years. About 5 years ago I was put on flecanaid, 150 mg
twiceTwice-a-day dailyDaily combo
Daily multiple for men 50+
Daily multiple for women
Daily multiple for women 50+
Daily multiple vitamins
Daily vite
Daily-vite men's formula
Daily-vite weight control. I was already taking
atenololAtenolol
Atenolol-chlorthalidone 50MG 1 per day. As I had gotten older I had more episodes, more frequently, of A-fib. I went for the ablation at NYUMC in New York City. I had the
normalNormal saline flush healing process, some bouts of a-fib, some skipped beats, etc. After 3 months I stopped the Flecanaide. Within 48 hours I was having skipped beats, lots of skipped beats. In fact they were so frequent that I could not function. I went back to the NYUMC doctor and told him the problem. Because during one of these episodes I reverted to A-fib for about 8 hours, he recomended a second ablation for a-fib. He also told me to take the flecanaid as before. Since back on the flecanaid I have had no a-fib, very few and infrequent skipped beats. Is the second ablation really needed if I am OK on medication? My problem is that if the ablation does not cure/reduce dramatically the skipped beats, I will still need the medication. Therefor, my mind tells me, if I am controlled on the drugs, and the ablation is not fixing the skipped beats, what's the sence of having the second ablation. The ablating doctor says he doesn't think I will remain controlled for long on the medication. What is your opinion of this mess.