Thank you Stef.......now I can make a well-informed decision when I find out my hbsag level.
Much appreciated......
most on the trials had 1000iu/ml but there was a patient at 8-9000iu/ml baseline and cleared too.of course the higher the hbsag the longer peg takes to clear
many thanks Stef.
Just one last question - if it turns out that my hbsag level is still quite high , is there some kind of cut-off point in numbers which you would say is too high to choose the peg add-on option? I hope to find out my hbsag level on Wednesday.
according to hbsag result i would go with pegintf add on, after 8 years of antiviral the chances of peg non response are almost null
as to overlap 1 week is too little you dont even reach steady drug levels in such short time, for safety on losing the degree of hbvdna suppression in the liver i d go from 1month to 3months combo but peg add on is better option
hi stef,
In my yearly appointment with my specialist last week I got his agreement to my switching to TDF (from ETV). ETV has actaually served me well ( I lost my e antigen a few years ago but never developed the e-antibodies) but after 8 years and with my readings the same as a year ago (UND, normal ALT etc) and given what I have recently read on this forum about long-term mitochondrial toxicity I wish to try switching to TDF as it seems to have a very slight edge over ETV in terms of potency (but again both drugs seem safe and highly effective and I am no medical expert, so I could be wrong to assume this).
Stef last year you mentioned a three-month overlap period when switching from ETV to TDF. I read a comment by musthinkpositive somewhere (but frustratingly I cannot trace it now) in which he mentioned a one-week overlap to another person with the same intention to switch from ETV to TDF .
That is my only concern, the difference in the two time periods mentioned. I see my specialist on Wednesday and was wondering if either you or musthinkpositive could comment on this ?
I also got my specialist to measure my s antigen (a victory as this is apparently unusual at my hospital) which again I will find out about on Wednesday. Finally my sincere admiration and deepest gratitude to you both and the other regular contributors to this important website.
typing error in my last message ...It should read ..."I won't spend money on........supplements"
Thanks everyone for these three comments.....I appreciate them all. I spend money on Milk Thistle supplements (there is no evidence of liver damage in my case). I will also look closely at the HBsAg trend and will take your comments on Tenofovir into account.
there are no studies on milk t. amd antivirals in vivo so we dont know for sure, since milk t. has shown antiviral properties in vivo and on human trials given IV on hcv it should have additctive antiviral effects
my suggestion is:
use it only if liver is damaged, if not it makes no sense to add it to nucs
use it when hbvdna is already undetectable so whatever effect it will not interfere with the antiviral work
i do use it but my liver was severely damaged
after 7 years hbsag should be low, check it as soon as possible, if hbsag has not lowered look for tenofovir which is much more potent than entecavir and make add on for about 3 months then discontinue entecavir, we do know the eeffect of entecavir on both hbsag and hbeag seroconversion is much much weaker than tenofovir and clinical practice studies have found much lower percentages of response than the studies presented by the drug maker of entecavir......so better consider only the clical practice results to judge entecavir
7 years effectiveness of entacivir, entacivir proves potent . test your hbsag quant in ' iu/ml with dilution' instruct specially 'with dilution'. otherwise test may be useless if hbsag is more than 250 IU/ml. after your test our knowledgeable members can help you.
Milk thistle blocks the absorbtion of entecavir. You will feel sick taking it.