This forum is for questions about medical issues and research aspects of
Hepatitis C such as, questions about being newly diagnosed, questions about current treatments, information and participation in discussions about research studies and clinical trials related to Hepatitis. If you would like to communicate with other people who have been touched by Hepatitis, please visit our new
Hepatitis Social/Living with Hepatitis forum
Since there is such minimum damage (and I am assuming no side affects) now it is easy to say wait. But since the progression is not steady, that does not mean the next 15 years will be the same (slow progress).
Are you healthy in other regards? I am considering that too. Since I have good health now, it may be better to treat - maybe better odds.
I would like to see your arguments for and against treatment. Everything I hear influences my decision.
That said (assuming you're a genotype 1) I'd follow your doctor's advice, except maybe get another biopsy in 3 years if you're a man and 3-5 years if you're a woman. (Male gender is a risk factor for fibrosis progression.)
Geno 1 is the hardest to treat and you really have to weigh the odds of clearing (about 40%) against treatment side effects both temporary and possibly permanent. I'm week 19 of 72 and believe me this is not a fun thing.
If you're a Geno 2, I could see more reasons to treat now since you're chance of clearing is much higher (80%) and the treatment is about half as long.
As reveniere says, better treatment is probably 3-5 years down the road.
http://janis7hepc.com/Related%20Conditions.htm
http://www.jcnmd.com/pt/re/jclnnmd/abstract.00131402-200303000-00002.htm;jsessionid=CTitHdZj2dtwn0Z5y34bOJhFdT8XfvqYW9xeDqX5EXFU8AGifYa3!-579262570!-949856031!9001!-1
these conditions might make it harder to clear the virus from the serum, and the longer they stay with you the more likely they might do irreversible damage to tissue like thyroid, joints, etc.
Good insurance is definetely a plus, since Medicare does not have a good prescription plan yet and the younger and healthier you are the easier it is to handle the sides. Getting rid of the pesky invader is definetely a welcome thing,; to finally call yourself non infectious, priceless.
Not everyone gets severe side effects on tx, most people don't, according to my GI. And most do not get severe long term effects. we can get long term effects just from having long term hcv infection, as seen in above articles.
Age is not on our side once we reach 50, you never know what complication can halt the onoing trials.
you could be hcv free by the time the new meds finally come out?.
The worst part is the lack of compassion and sympathy. You really find out who your friends are when you go through something like this. I guess people understand chemo with cancer but they don't get it with the HCV. I've done this alone (my poor 13 year old son has had to deal with so much this past 6 1/2 months), no family and friends dropping like flies.
It's true that a lot of people don't have a response that has been as bad as mine. But we are out there. I've started to tell you all about it several times but didn't want to scare people. I guess censoring myself wasn't fair to me or others since we are supposed to be able to speak truthfully here. I hope to return to the pretty woman I used to be. I hope my brain slows down and I will be able to sleep again. I hope I will enjoy things again, and most of all to be the loving mom I used to be. Time will tell.
Thanks for listening.
-cbee
So - to wait for vx-950 (try for a clinical trial) & risk further deterioration or endure tx on currently available meds (very scary). I'll just keep learning as much as I can over the coming months as I decide. All input is welcome.
Your story is is like many, many others. Sure, some people fly through treatment with little or no problems. But many like yourself (and myself) end up in what can accurately be described sometimes as a living hell. And there are all too many posts about people still having side effects when treatment is over.
So it gets personal with me when I hear some people say "treat, treat, treat" regardless of genotype, liver damage, etc., etc.
Like most here, I don't believe in a cookie cutter approach. I believe in *individualized* treatment that can include double-dosing, infergen, extended treatment, weight-based riba, early Procrit and Neupogen intervention, etc.
But individualized treatment also means some people probably shouldn't treat. Especially those genotype 1a's and 1b's with little or no liver damage. Especially today when for the first time newer and better treatments are realistically only a few years away.
We all want to get rid of the virus, but trying to get rid of it "at all costs" IMO is based more on emotion than good medicine.
Keep in mind that when you read people having side effects after tx, it is not always because they appeared during tx. Many of us had blossoming conditions in various stages of development due to hcv, many that we did not know were there until the meds enhanced them. If you truly want the full pic, ask them if they had these before tx.
It is a risk one way or another if tx is optional, you could live with hcv with no extrahepatic symptoms or you could develop cirrhosis or ESLD in only 3 yrs like at least two people have posted here. You roll the dice.
______________
Cuteus,
To an extent I agree with you here, as one possible strategy. In other words, try the meds, as you may be one of the lucky ones not only with very tolerable sx but someone who clears the virus early.
Where we disagree, is that I wouldn't encourage type 1's with very little liver damage to endure treatment if things started getting too rough. Nor would I urge them into extended treatment, or more agressive dosing should they not have an early viral response. In fact, if a stage 0 or 1 didn't have an EVR by week #4, they might consider quitting at that point.
To me, the more agressive strategies, above, make more sense for those with severe liver damage or cirrhosis. Stage 0's and 1's have time to wait. 3's and 4's may not.
Having said this, I applaud your personal attitude toward treatment and the determination and strength you obviously have.
In the end, to treat or not to treat is a very personal decision with no right or wrong answers.
The thing about these post is sometimes people change there stories. I've have read some posters acting as tx is a piece off cake, then reading one of their post from a year ago and find a completely different story.
I understand you cbee by not wanting to scare anyone, and I know everyone reacts diferently to tx. My Dr. warned me that I would probably feel alot worse when I started tx. There are so many variables that go into deciding to treat and how a person will fair on treatment.
For me I know tx is the right thing, I was already getting pretty sick before tx. I wish everyone here well, this board has helped me tremendously.
thanks for listening
This forum helped me stay the course, and the vicoprofen for aches. Those were my lifelines...and of course, my beautiful daughter.
don't be afraid to ask your dr for effective pain meds, you need to feel close to being a human. and don't let the anemia disable you, many drs wait until you are near transfusion status before intervening.
it will be over soon and then you will not remember much of what this year was like. That is why some sound like they had a breeze, We forgot the actual hell we endured. The fog is a blessing in this case!
Honestly, I can not remember how bad I felt then, my hair is back, my skin does not look ashen, Summer is not killing me,,,,I guess I do remember some stuff, lol.
You be well
So just to make it perfectly clear, anyone (regardless of stage) on treatment (or who has completed treatment) has nothing but 100 per cent of my support, admiration and prayers. My comments are simply directed to people who are asking our opinions on making treatment decisions. In the end, hopefully people will make the choice right for them.
Honey... You're right, it's not a simple decision and age does play a factor although if someone has remained at stage 0 or 1 for thirty years, the chances of shooting to stage 4 within the next three years is low. But like you suggest, that doesn't mean it couldn't happen. You gotta roll your own dice.
The other thing about age is your general health. I wish I started treatment a year earlier when my health was excellent. Two weeks before I started treatment I came down with a bad case of reflux and now I'm probably stuck with tx and reflux for the next 52 weeks.
good luck
Cuteus, I respect your position. Everything you say has merit. It is, as you point out, the only way to kill the dreaded virus. And I am sure you are right, that everyone does not have bad sides.
Revenire, Jmjm530, Cbee, Califia - you speak out of the wisdom of experience. Many of you have changed your thinking over time. The pain and suffering you have indured in order to be free of the virus is immense. I think you truly don't want to see others suffer as you did unless it is necessary -- and I agree with you -- that at a Stage/Grade 3 treatment is a must.
Moeymitt, Stusee -- looks like you have made your decisions not to treat, based on your doctors' advice. Moeymitt - you are the triathalete, I believe, and therefore keep yourself in excellent shape. You decision is solid. Stusee - I don't know. Defer to the doctor, I guess.
As for me, I have until 9:00 tomorrow to make my decision. So I am going to be hanging in here for the next hour or so reading posts and trying to decide.
I am 1a, biopsy grade 1, stage 1 ( I did get the pathologist to grade it and got the results today). I am leaning towards treating but if I do not reach EVR at 12 weeks, discontinuing. I think I owe it to myself to try to clear this disease, but not at the expense of my livelihood. Brain fog could wipe me out. I could lose my tax practice (I am a CPA) if I can't think. The other sx I have read about on these posts that concerns me is the bone loss around the teeth. I have an appointment tomorrow right before my appointment at 9:00 with the GI with a dentist who was going to do a dental implant. (Besides the fact that I have just spent my implant money on a biopsy...) I am thinking of postponing the implant. I can't see paying the big bucks for that only to have the bone disintegrate around it.
One of the big arguments I can make for treating is focus. I am afraid if I don't take action now, I will ignore it and I already did that in 1993 when I first found out I had hep c antibodies. Only by luck did my liver stay fairly healthy.
I may change my mind by morning...
If you are not having a terrible, unbearable time and endangering organs, bone marrow, etc. Stay the course even if no 2 log drop by week 12, even. I had a 1.82 log drop at wk 12. I wanted to quit so many times, but I wanted HCV gone for good more. My counts were decent, thyroid holding, needed Procrit at month 3, and pain meds, but I was able to finish 72 shots and the bugger is either still hiding in fear or GONE for good.
Again, had I follow an advise like JM's, I would not be at this point today. I would still be learnig to live with HCV and staring at the little orange labels in my medical charts that alerted people of my status. After my yrs PCR, I am going to ask them to remove them!
I am warning all considering tx that you will feel like quitting many times, I don't think anybody I met did not get that thought.
If you do decide to treat, consider using 4 weeks as your goal for EVR instead of 12. If you EVR within 4 weeks, continue treatment. No EVR, take a break and wait for better stuff down the road.
Given your lack of fibrosis, an EVR within 4 weeks would probably give you a 70-80% chance of SVR, versus a 40-50% chance of SVR if you EVR at 12 weeks. This changes the risk/reward equation significantly.
I like the way you're weighing all the pro's and con's and then factoring them into your own personal situation. In the end, once you have all the facts, it becomes a personal decision from the gut. Good luck!
My next question was if she could tell me if the stage one grade 2 was a recent development and now progressing or if it had happened 20 yrs ago and still holding. Of course she could not answer that one, and having birthdays was not helping...so I had to try.
you have the advantage of two biopsies showing similar results.
gl in your decission process.
Pegasys 180 mg in prefilled syringes, Copegus 1200mg per day. (Ha - I know you can guess my weght ........but I didn't miss it by much. Maybe the more Riba the better, eh?)
Cuteus and JmJm - Not sure yet as to what I will do if I don't clear by 12. I meant to ask him today for a 4 week pcr - but I asked him so much, I forgot that. I think he will do it. I will have another apt with him after shot 4. I am pretty healthy overall so maybe I will clear by 4. If I don't clear by 12 I think it will depend on the sides.
Moey. Good luck on your decision. This last two months have been hell. I actually feel more at peace today since the dx two months ago.
Week #4 numbers can be very helpful for a multitude of tx decisions down the road. My doc gave me weekly PCR's until I cleared at week 6. And, yes, the more riba the better. Just make sure your doc agrees to intervene with Procrit should you start getting anemic.
Cuteus...Nevermind. :-)
I took my Rx for the Peg and Copeg to the pharmacy yesterday. If it comes in, I will take the first injection tonight. If not, I guess I will wait until next Friday.
kathy