This forum is for questions about medical issues and research aspects of
Hepatitis C such as, questions about being newly diagnosed, questions about current treatments, information and participation in discussions about research studies and clinical trials related to Hepatitis. If you would like to communicate with other people who have been touched by Hepatitis, please visit our new
Hepatitis Social/Living with Hepatitis forum
I never looked into what she told me to verify its veracity, but she did seem like a sharp nurse. Anyway, something to consider if you have what might be considered marginal antibody levels to a possibly outdated standard. If HR reads this maybe he can clue us in about it too.
My Quest labs read as follows:
HAV AB, TOTAL Reactive
------------------------------------------------------
HEPATITIS B SURFACE AB,QN
9 (appears to be under "reactive" column) L (Reference range > ./=10 mIU/mL)
Patient does not have immunity to hepatitis B virus.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
HEPATITIS B SURFACE AB, QL
Indeterminate * Non Reactive
----------------------------------------------------------------------
###
thanks
Jim, i got my last shot of the series of 3 around 4 months ago. i will be getting the anti body test bloodwork to see if they took, i will let you know
SGPT: 58.10 normal value should be 0-49 mg/dl
Hbs Ag Sreening Test: Reactive
Thanks again!
In my case, the Hep A vaccine worked and the Hep B didn't. This is not uncommon for the Hep B vaccine not to take.
I assume, or at least hope. that your docs followed up and checked your antibodies at some point after your vaccines, easy enough to ask.
The tests you need are the ones I posted earlier in the thread where I show the values. At least those are the way the tests are reported from Quest Labs.
As mentioned, sometimes if they don't take, they then double-dose the vaccine.
-- Jim
My experience with 'naturally' acquired HAV/HBV antibodies (exposures 1961/1973 respectively) are that the antibodies are durable.
But definitely, with my health history I want to make certain I'm covered. With so many people here having gotten the vaccinations after they had HCV and the vaccinations not seeming to take as well, I wonder if the HCV - and hey, this is way out in left field - somehow affects the vaccine? Nah. Probably not possible. Anyway, I'll go ahead my doc test mine. I NEVER want to have to go through a hideous treatment like this again LOL
Speaking of which, I know its on a different thread but can you BELIEVE they are letting that #^@#@ doctor who shared needles between patients keep his license? I'm going to write to the medical board in that state and "share" with them just a little bit about what its like living with and treating this disease. That man does not deserve to continue to practice. Its an abomination.
Just kidding. We need to have all the info, great or not.
I have done some literature research on this topic some months ago, but unfortuantely several articles are written in German again. Here is what I have learned from the studies:
1.) Jilg et al., Impfversagen nach Hepatitis-B-Impfung, Einfluss zusätzlicher Impfungen, Dt. med. Wschr. 115 (1990) 1545-1548.
Re-immunisation (1 to 3 times) of nonresponders resulted in response (6 of 14)
2.) Dennhöfer, Hepatitis-B-Schutzimpfung – Zum Problem der ungenügenden Anti-HBs-Bildung, Dt. med. Wschr. 115 (1990), 1560-1565.
He describes some factors affecting response rates. A higher dose (40 ug instead of 10 ug) is sometime helpful,
A longer interval between immunisations (> 6 months) improves response quality. Interestingly the time of the day (!) had an influence on response rates: Immunisations late afternoon gave better results than early in the morning. The authors suggest a connection to th corticoid level, which is depending on the daytime.
3.) Hofmann et al., Zur Effizienz der Hepatitis B-Schutzimpfung, Gesundheitswesen 59 (1997) 537-534.
A large group of workers at a german university was tested (5035 persons). The best results had women compared to men, jounger beter than older, low BMI beter than high BMI, non-smokers.
4.) Rosman et al., Improving the Response to Hepatitis B Vaccine. Infections in Med., 1999, 205
The authors find better results with higher doses (40 ug) than 10 ug.
5.) Alper et al., Genetic Prediction of Nonrespons to Hepatitis B Vaccine, New Engl. Journ. of Med., 1989.
The authors describe a genetic componenet as responsible factor. This genes do not affect other immunisations.
6.) Stück, Lowresponder nach Hepatitis-B-Impfung im Kindesalter. Pädiat. Prax. 58, 577-578 (2000).
This work describes bad response in persons with occult HCV infection.
Conclusion from these publications:
The best place for an immunisation seems to be the upper arm. The best time of the day the afternoon. Higher doses and repeated immunisations (long intervals) work sometime. Reimmunisations after the first round should be done after a longer interval, which is 6 months and 18 months.
Good luck! drofi
should be females compared to males :-)
I should do a higher dose, with longer intervals, in the late afternoon, injected into the upper arm, after visiting Jenny*, and after having a sex change operation. Except that I should have done all this at age 16, before I started smoking and probably in Germany, where they understand all these things.
You know -- I was going to ask my doc to try another series, but now not quite sure it's worth it :)
*http://www.jennycraig.com/
--------------------------------------------
Listen, any time your stress hormone levels just aren't delivering, just let me know.
no, you did not get it right.
To change your sex has a bad risk/benefit ratio and probably would not increase response rate, because it does not change the sexual genotyp, the phenotyp only. Not a good idea, but nice thought. To stop smoking would be helpful anyway and you can do it wherever you are.
Your other conclusions are correct.
-------------------------------------------
Drofi - suspected that was going to be the case. I'll check out my vaccine but I'm willing to bet its ok. I did mostly everything right. Low bmi, afternoon, female, ok yeah, I was 36 - so sue me - don't smoke, didn't have HCV at the time, good intervals on immunizations, decent doses. Still, I'll test it and make certain.
Jim - on that stress thing. Somehow knew I could count on you....
sure, these conclusions from the papers are statistical data only. It is the same with SVR rates: For the statistics it is not important on which side of the 50% you are individually, but for yourself it is...
However, this forum has some mood improving effect anyway. I am curious which alias Jim will use after joining jenny craig and having finished his/her sex change operation.
As to the other, my money's on Jenna 2, or Jenna Too... I'm seeing something in kind of a twins dynamic going on.
-- Jim (for now)