Aa
A
A
Close
Avatar universal
Dr. wants to extend tx!!!!! yikes!
2nd tx.  rvr at 4 wks this time.   Now at 41 wks.  still und.  Got a letter from my doc today that he recommends I extend tx 24 more wks past the 48!!!  Even with und at 4 wks????  he states that it is because I relapsed last time.  But last time I was und at 11 wks.  not 4.  I have had a hard time with tx, 3 blood tx.  anemia is awful.  so are the side effects from the neupogen...just to name a few.  I cannot stomach even thinking about an extra six months....what are your thoughts guys?
Cancel
150 Answers
Page 1 of 1
1491755 tn?1333204962
My heart goes out to you.  I wish I was a hepatologist and could offer you an educated opinion.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
i meant 3 blood transfusions, not 3 blood tx...

jean
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
1477908 tn?1349571310
Ugh, I've been at that crossroad too.

Can I ask what your staging is? I read you had a Riba reduction a few months back...how long did that last and at what dose?
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
That's my question as well.  Were your dosages reduced at all in your last treatment and for this treatment and if yes, at what weeks, for how long and by how much?  Thanks.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
NO WAY! Take your chances. With a 4 week RVR I would feel confident to stop at 48.  You have Telaprevir or Boceprevir to fall back on if you relapse. I just dont think another 24 weeks of the harsh drugs damaging the body is worth it.

If I did anything beyond 48 weeks it would be tapering off the interferon.

Something like 3/4 shot 49th week, 1/2 shot 50th, 1/4 shot 51st.

The tapering off gives your immune system time to start fighting on its own. Do data on this just personal experience and opinion.

Best of luck
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
I am a 1b.  1/2 biopsy.  i had a riba reduction and it has not been increased, because of my weight loss and my anemia problems.  I started at 1000, and have been at 800 since the reduction.    I am so disillusioned right now.  My alt/ast is normal for the first time!  wasnt during last tx.  und at 4 wks.  11 wks last tx.    I am really torn up about this.

Jean
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
Wow what a nice christmas gift from your doctor hey? Although it does seem to be the norm that doctors extend tx for relapsers even if und at week 12. how being rvr plays into that i don't know. If you do decide to extend tx try not to look at it as 6 more months, just play it one week at a time.

For all you have went through already you must be one tough cookie and determine to beat this, myself i would try and go as long as i could, just one week at a time.

Wishing you the very best,
cando
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
i had the same riba reduction last tx.  I think it was around 20 wks.  It did not get increased.  because of my weight, and anemia.  no transfusions last time.  but it has been really rough with the anemia this time.

copyman,
I am inclined to agree with you.  I feel I will have svr. If not, I would rather do 6 mos with a pi thrown in.  plus, my body needs a break, as well as my mind.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
cando,

I feel being rvr has got to be a good thing.  Makes me wonder if good ole doc took that into consideration before writing his letter.  BTW, I was just in his office last Thursday....???
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
" I would rather do 6 mos with a pi thrown in"

Would it only be 6 months if you were a 2 time relapser? Something you might want to ask.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
" Makes me wonder if good ole doc took that into consideration before writing his letter"

Good point there!
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
cando

i just assumed it would be 6 mos.  but you may be right.  as a 1b relapser, it may be longer.  Just as I thought I may be getting my life back soon....but don't you think being a rvr is in my favor of stopping at 48?
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
I would say ditto on can-do-man's comments, all of them.  I wouldn't be so quick to throw away 41 weeks of treatment and an RVR without digging deep and giving it just a little extra kick.  If I had already toughed my way through 41 weeks of treatment, I'd keep going and hope I'd never have to do this again.  Telaprevir and Boceprevir have yet to be approved and once they're approved, the insurance companies need to do their part and it's unknown what they're going to cost.  If you were waiting on treatment or still detectable at 12 weeks, that would be different.  But you've already made it to 41 weeks and toughed through this.  I sure wouldn't want to do this again if I didn't have to and Tela and Boce both require interferon and ribavirin.

I'd approach it also not as 6 months but one week at a time.  I'd get as far as I could tolerate and then stop.  That's my take on it.....not being actually IN your shoes.

It's your body .. and your experience however.  And a tough decision regardless so I wish you good luck in sorting out what's best for you.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
I would also agree...that as a two -time relapser, they may want you to go 48 weeks even with Telaprevir or Boceprevir.  I would give your current tx as much kick as you can muster up in you and hope it sticks.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
cando/trish

what do you think of copymans idea of tapering off the interferon?
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
Sure do, being rvr has to be in your favor, not sure i recall anyone here ever being in this situation before, just the normal relapser doing 72 weeks their next tx if being a g1..... Being you have little liver damage might be a good way to look at it.......... Really sorry you have to be going through this.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
Can I ask what your ribavirin dosage has been throughout your treatment up until now?  That's the only dosage reduction you've had?  Thanks.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
thx cando.  really bummed.  but this tx has a way of doing that to us, doesn't it!

Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
Tapering to me would be just like dose reducing, myself it would be all or nothing. Just my opinon though.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
1477908 tn?1349571310
That's a tough call. If you were a 3-4, I'd say stay the course, especially since you've got so much invested into tx already. Is your 800 mg. Riba weight based for you?  With your bx and the serious anemia issues throughout, if I were in your shoes, I'd stick it out as long as I could, at least to 48 weeks and hope for the best. I went 72 but I didn't have the anemia issues you have and was crawling my way to the finish line.Teleprevir would be perhaps your best bet since Boceprevir has serious anemia issues. Like can-do said, there's no guarantee of the 6 month course with the PI's, so I wouldn't count on that. It's a hard call being so close to the new drugs and being so near the end of your second tx. My heart goes out to you.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
yes trish.  just riba reduction.  started at 1000. reduced to 800.  I cheated for awhile and stayed at 1000, but the anemia got so bad I had to reduce.  Doc wanted to go to 600, but I never did it.  Im a bad girl....
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
"but this tx has a way of doing that to us, doesn't it!"

That it does, but we fight on. As a relapser that is now SVR it was worth it... Just keep smiling.

Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
I totally intend to finish out the 48.  Maybe kick in 52, if I can.  But I don't know if I can...the anemia is awful!!  Yes paen53, the riba is weight based.  I started out around 130 and am now at 104.  have been around 102-108 the last few months.  I guess so much of my dilemma is emotional.  If I had gone into this knowing I would be doing 72 would be one thing....but I didn't.  and with a 4 wk RVR, I just never even though I would be advised to extend...my bad.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
cando,

how many times did you tx?  and for how long?
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
"Tapering to me would be just like dose reducing, myself it would be all or nothing. Just my opinon though. "

Ditto to can-do-man. Again.  I'd give it full guns if I was going to keep going.  Riba and interferon full, a week at a time to what you can tolerate.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
First tx i was a slow responder so i went 86 weeks and relapsed, then got in a boceprevir trial, did 48 weeks and now SVR.... But i was stage 4 so decisions was not as hard to make.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
cando

wow.  86 wks!  My hat is off to you...    what geno are you?  Congrats on your svr!!!!  
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
"I guess so much of my dilemma is emotional.  If I had gone into this knowing I would be doing 72 would be one thing....but I didn't.  "

That's tough, particularly when it's unexpected.  Really...everyone has the potential to be facing an extension to 72 weeks going in.  Or...the opposite.  I had mine yanked on me at 34 weeks unexpectedly.  Didn't like that much either.  Treatment is really an expect the unexpected but it's hard to prepare for every eventuality.  Some things happen you weren't expecting and then you have to adjust.

If this is mostly mental....then take some time to adust your thinking and take it a week at a time.  I wouldn't necessarily see the need to go a full six more months but I can see some logic in going somewhere beyond 48 weeks.  
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
1477908 tn?1349571310
Getting near the end of tx and then hearing you should extend IS an emotional issue - no doubt about it. I knew I had to extend, but was crushed (an understatement) when I had to stay at high doses. Once the shock wore off, I was able to re-focus and stay the course - and you may find  you get your mojo back too. One day at a time........
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
This is a very personal decision that only you can make. My feeling is if you are going to relapse at this point you are going to even with 72 weeks or even a 100 weeks! If you relapse after 4 week unde then it dont matter how long you treat.  

What weeks did you get the PCR done during this treatment?

Being an EVR (early responder) first tx & RVR this tx I would stop at 48 weeks or taper  off like I said in my last post.

I think what damage can be done with that extra 24 weeks and it just doesn't make sense.  I don't think the odds or risk makes it worth it.

But enough of that negative talk. You are going to SVR this time :)
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
I was a geno 1b and crazy, now i'm just crazy.....:)
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
copyman

I had PCR done at 4wks, 12 wks, 24 wks and 36wks.  Did the ultra sensitive test  which test down to 2.  (not 43 like the dr used last time).  with these tests, my normal enzymes, my RVR, just the one riba reduction, which made sense due to my weight, even though I cheated for a little while,  I truly feel like I would have svr...

cando

I am 1b also.  tough ones, arent we!
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
The logic to me would be to go , as a 1b, 48 wks of tx once you are und.  Since I was und at 4 wks (and maybe before, just did not test until then), I would think that 52 wks could do the trick.  Is my thinkng askewed?
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
87972 tn?1322664839
As a genotype 1 patient, I treated the first time with Pegasys; I didn’t achieve a 2 log drop at 12 weeks, so we increased riba to 1800 mg/day and because I didn’t become fully undetectable until between week 16 and 20, we extended treatment to 56 weeks. I relapsed at 30 days post.

Second go around, we changed to Pegintron, and increased riba to 2000 mg/day. I became undetectable for virus between weeks 4 and 8 this time. My doctor agreed to allow me to extend to 96 weeks based on liver damage (stage 3-4), previous relapse, and also because I tolerated therapy so well. I never really became anemic or neutropenic, and other than some fatigue, I found it very tolerable. I was successful the last time, and have now been SVR since August, 2008.

The landscape has changed since then; some form of three way cocktail appears inevitable, and of course, I wasn’t dealing with the side effects you are, Jean. I won’t try to interject with any opinion, I just wanted to share my experience with you, and wish you the best. You can draw whatever you want to from this.

Good luck and I hope everything works out for you this time, regardless of the path you choose.

Take care—

--Bill




Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
Thank you Bill.  So glad you achieved svr after so much hard work.  I don't know what to do.  Scared to extend, scared not to.....

Jean
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
29837 tn?1414538248
A few months from now when you're completele Hep free, all this won't matter. I say go for it with careful monitpring by your doctor...

Magnum
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
29837 tn?1414538248
Make that "monitoring" by your doctor...

Magnum
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
Well jt, I put 72 straight weeks into it and it's not easy.  Long term exposure to interferon and possible post tx side effects shouldn't be an issue because you've already been exposed, nothing you can do about that now.  Just for the record, I didn't ever have any problems with that,

You upped the odds of SVR with an RVR but you didn't guarantee anything just like extending ups the odds but no guarantee.  However, extending doesn't increase the odds by very much but RVR does.  I like numbers and I'm not sure if my math is accurate but the way I see it and factoring in previous relapse you've got about a 70 percent chance of beating this by extending out to 72 weeks.  If you stop at 48 weeks and relapse you go another 48 weeks with a PI and a 75 percent chance versus six more months with SOC with 70 percent chance.  If it were me, I'd go for extending SOC.

I've never thought tapering interferon was beneficial.  Seen several who have followed that concept but it didn't work to their advantage.  Hit the virus with all you got right to the very end under the watchful eye of your doctor of course.

Trinity

  
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
"Long term exposure to interferon and possible post tx side effects shouldn't be an issue because you've already been exposed, nothing you can do about that now.  Just for the record, I didn't ever have any problems with that, "

I wouldn't say that's exactly true.  Continuing to pump interferon and ribavirin into a body can do interesting things over time and it simply needs to be monitored.  I don't think any of us who DID come out with post tx side effects were able to predict that we would and it doesn't seem to have much to do with how short or how long one was on the treatment.  It simply impacts people in different ways.  You can take a slew of people who were all on treatment for the same length of time even and they will go through treatment AND come out of it differently. That's where the careful monitoring comes in.  And that doesn't necessarily prevent something such as thyroid issues, it does catch them though so that you can deal with them and manage what comes along. That's all you can do.  Take it a step at a time and deal with what comes.  So I wouldn't want to hold out false hope that you're at no risk of additional side effects or post side effects.  The fact is...we simply don't know and we take our chances with this stuff and we go along under the careful (hopefully) supervision of our doctors and we keep an eye on our own labs and do the best we can.  

Good luck with your decision, jt57.

Trish


Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
Of all the people to have to extend treatment, I can just imagine how difficult it is to get this news when you were thinking it was almost time to wrap it up.

You've been through a really tough battle, but of course there is no way to know for sure what is the best course of action. If you hadn't suffered sever side effects (especially anemia) during tx then the generally prescribed method seems to be to extend.

I suppose there is always consideration of how extended tx will risk one's body. It seems only you can make that decision. Obviously you can stop anytime if you choose to extend.

I am sorry you are facing this now, I know how much I am counting on tx being over, and I haven't been through nearly what you have been through.

Good Luck - Dave
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
I agree with the others who have said that this is very emotional for you because of the shock of finding out that you should go another 24 weeks when you thought you were finishing soon.  But you still have 7 weeks to make that decision.  I would concentrate on the goal of 48 weeks first.  Then you could decide to continue for a few weeks more as long as you can stand it.

Vik
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
(2) 48 week tx = 96 wks SOC

(1) 48 week tx + (1) 72 wk = 120 wks SOC

(2) 48 week tx + (1) 48 wk triple  = 144 wks

(1) 48 week tx + (1) 72 wk + (1) 48 wk triple = 168 wks

The math indicates long term exposure to interferon with all the scenarios.  
96 wks - 120 wks - 144 wks - 168 wks.... all long term exposure.  Jt's case in particular, the point is if she does experience post tx side what duration time was responsible?  The least amount of exposure to interferon will be 96 weeks and that's a long time.  That bell has rung, can't take that back.  That's not false hope, those are facts.

Trinity
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
I am the type of person that has to have a goal in sight....can change the goal along the way if I have too, don't always like it, but.....

I am definately going to go 52 wks.  instead of 48.  If my body will allow.  I feel i can definately add 4 more wks to the mix.  But will have to wait and see about more.  My concern is the anemia, phsically, and my emotional state.  The drs have played with my procrit this entire tx, which has caused me to end up in the hospital, 3 transfusions.  My  hema is wanting to dump the procrit and just do regular transfusions, but I don't agree.  I hate the transfusions and the procrit will work if they just give me what I need!!!    Emotionally I am not good.  All my relationships are suffering.  I really need to weigh out LIFE.   To go on another six months is a hard pill for me to swallow.  And Im not sure my family can take it.  I'm pretty mean these days   and I cry very easily, which they are not used to.  We have all been marking the days off the calendar. Now the wind has been knocked out of all our sails..I have tried to be strong, I have tried to hang in there.  But there come a time when I am going to have ro recognize my own limitations.  I placed a call to the dr after I got his NICE LETTER, but have not heard from him yet.  Hopefully I will today.  Throwing 4 more wks into the mix cant hurt.  I will have to wait and see if I can do more.  In my heart, I feel I am cured...But as we all know with this disease, there is no guarantee.

I so appreciate all the feedback.  BUT IM HANGING ONTO THE FACT THAT I AM A RVR THIS TX, EVR LAST TX.   Had high iron and ferritin issues with last tx.  did not start with those issues this tx.  Hit it hard with riba, even after the reduced me.  cheated until I couldnt because of the anemia.  OH, what is a girl to do.....
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
979080 tn?1323437239
not that it changes anything , but i find it strange that you get extention news @wk41
what has changed since wk4 other that you stayed UND all this time ?

Also I would want to know how much exactly your doctor thinks the extension will
increase your odds ? There is never a 100% as we all know.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
The key here is that there is no hard data stating 72 weeks will increase your odds of SVR, "that much", if any. However there is data showing RVR increases the odds a lot so that is why 48 weeks would be enough for "me".

As for the tapering off the drugs. This concept was something I have seen others do with success and my doctor also (Hepatologist) went along with it. It worked for me but I also did Telaprevir so who knows.
I didn't taper off thinking it would guarantee SVR. I just liked the concept, it made sense to me and figured it couldn't hurt. I had the extra drugs so why not.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
good point Bali05      I think the fact that I have remained und is his validation that I should just keep on keeping on.  But Im like you.  why extention news now?   Wish I had known months ago...
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
96938 tn?1189803458
If you relapse after 52 weeks it's 100 wasted weeks.  There is no carry-over benefit to a 3rd tx.
How sensitive was that 4 week pcr and are you sure it was 4 weeks?  It's not unreasonable to re-check basic information when making a weighty decisions.

If you are in the vicinity of 100-120 pounds I'd think about extending (maybe not a full 24 but some middle ground) with 600 mg riba.

You don't want to do this a thrid time.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
FLGUY

the 4 week pcr was to 43,  the rest of the tests have been measured down to 2.  And yes, it was 4 weeks to the day.  all of my tests have been, this tx.  what are the odds that 72 weeks is better for me that 48, or 52?  I feel that if I give up more of my life for this tx, which I have really fought hard to hang in there and slay this dragon, it might be better spent when the pi's are available.  when my body is stronger.    I am really scratching and clawing to make it 48, but Im determined to do so.  and feel I can squeeze in 52.  but not sure about more.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
96938 tn?1189803458
From what you write you most significant problems (anemia, procrit, transfusions) seem to stem from the riba.  I saw your post about your current weight and 800, 1000 riba.  Your body seem to respond to the riba (unlike some people).  At about 102 pounds, 600 is about the right weight dose and you seem to have positively responded to less riba whe you reduced it in the past.

Toleration of treatment, in many respects, is a key to continuing.  Maybe if you drop the riba a bit (as the doc suggests, by the way) maybe the intolerable treatment can be a tiny bit more tolerable even if it's not the full 24 the doc suggests.

It's generally a good idea for the patient to survive treratment.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
179856 tn?1333550962
To be honest I did 72 and it wasn't that easy. However it worked. so it's hard for me not to suggest going with your docs opinion since you have relapsed once already. It's not just getting to UND it's training your body to use it's own immune system that is clutch to success. If it doesn't do it........that's where the relapse happens.

I dont know any studies to suggest that 52 would do anymore than 48, if I was you I would go as long as I could just taking it one week at a time.

You really don't want to have to do this again, PI or not. FLGs suggestion of dropping the riba down (at this point it is your body weight anyway and you are far out in tx) and continuing the interferon to get that immune system trainned makes the most sense to me.

I am curious why the doc did not bring this up earlier. In my case I had to fight for it and it wasn't approved until week 46 but at least I knew I had done everything I could at that point and what would happen would happen.

Good luck Jean either way!
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
Hi Jean-
I don't want to make this anymore difficult for you, but in case you haven't already read this information perhaps it will be useful. It doesn't seem to differentiate between und at 4 weeks and 12 weeks in relapsers from what I am understanding.
Good luck,
Dave

http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/hep_c/news/2010/010510_a.html
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2893.2009.01218.x/abstract

Management of Non-responders and Relapsers Treated with Pegylated Interferon plus Ribavirin for Chronic Hepatitis C


SUMMARY: Management of patients who do not achieve sustained response to an initial course of interferon-based combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a challenge, according to a review article in the December 2009 Journal of Viral Hepatitis. Fewer than 10% of non-responders benefit from re-treatment, but the odds improve with extended duration of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin, and directly targeted anti-HCV agents offer hope for the future.


By Liz Highleyman

Fewer than half of patients with hard-to-treat HCV genotype 1 achieve sustained virological response (SVR) -- or a cure -- with their first attempt at treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin.

"The probability of a previously treated patient responding to re-treatment depends on the nature of the previous regimen, the magnitude of the response to previous treatment, and the patient's characteristics," wrote Douglas Dieterich from Mount Sinai School of Medicine and colleagues.

In particular, relapsers (those who achieved undetectable HCV RNA during treatment but experienced a rise in viral load after completing therapy) have higher re-treatment SVR rates, as do people who experienced partial response (reduction but not clearance of HCV RNA) compared with complete non-responders.

Re-treatment of non-responders using a standard 48-week regimen of pegylated interferon alfa plus ribavirin resulted in sustained response rates of about 6% in the EPIC-3 program and about 8% in the REPEAT trial. In REPEAT, however, the SVR rate was twice as high -- 16% -- in those re-treated for 72 weeks (P = 0.0006). "Based on available data," Dieterich and colleagues wrote, "extended treatment is the best option for these individuals."

Undetectable HCV RNA at week 12 was an important predictor of successful re-treatment in the REPEAT and EPIC studies, as it is for initial therapy.

Based on disappointing results from trials such as HALT-C, the review authors noted that, "Maintenance therapy with pegylated interferon is generally ineffective in non-responders and cannot be recommended."

Directly acting antiviral agents, such as the experimental HCV protease inhibitors telaprevir and boceprevir, may increase sustained response rates in prior non-responders and relapsers. However, these drugs have mostly been studied in combination with interferon plus ribavirin -- therefore adding to the burden of adverse events -- and "will not be available for some years."

In conclusion, Dieterich and colleagues wrote, "after careful evaluation of an individual's benefit-risk ratio, a 72-week regimen is the preferred strategy for optimizing sustained response rates in patients who have not responded to the standard of care, provided that viral RNA is undetectable at week 12 of re-treatment."

Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; Division of Gastro-Hepatology, Ospedale S. Giovanni Battista (Molinette), Torino, Italy; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endocrinology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany.

1/05/10

Reference
DT Dieterich, M Rizzetto, and MP Manns. Management of chronic hepatitis C patients who have relapsed or not responded to pegylated interferon alfa plus ribavirin. Journal of Viral Hepatitis 16(12): 833-843 (Abstract). December 2009.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
1113735 tn?1273178030
Hello Congretulations for SVR. I am apsolutely with Trish , when it comes to extending tx to 72 weeks. Specially because you are geno 1b. Do your best to endure untill the end.I have a same problem. I am geno 1 and went through therapy. I was undetect.at week 12, (dont know before that, because they did my PCR only at begining , and at week 12, and ofcourse the end of therapy). At the end (48 weeks) detectable again.I also had a lot of problems with anemia, because he reduced me Riba.to 800 ( and I am not a little , and small girl, eventhough I lost by then about 10 kg).I am sure that reducing therapy, is strongly associated and connected to the final  results.I never took any of medications for raising blood plateletes (since my Government Funds dont pay for that). IT was October 2008, when I finished. Now is two years since then , and I am thinking about repeating it again. My Doc. told me that is up to me, so I will have to make decision, since I will have to finance therapy this time on my own. Waiting for a new Tele or Boce+Peg.and Riba., might take a while, specialy in the country where  I am from (east Europe).If I decide, which I think I will do, if I face anemia again, I will go for Eritropoetin, or so ( in your country is Procrit, Neupogen, etc....)its the same thing I guess, (if someone is more familliar with that can give me a clue).I know that is far from easy, but keep on untill 72 weeks! Good,good luck!
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
96938 tn?1189803458
These things are not questions to you but me wondering out loud...

Based on what I read, your second treatment is the same as your first treatment with the exception that you responded earlier the second time (11 vs 4) and you seemed to hit the wall earlier too.

The thing that gnaws at me is the concept that if you do the same thing the second time that you did the first time that one would expect the same result.  The wild card in all this is the 4 vs 11 and wondering what the difference  is between TX 1 and TX 2, which is preplexing.

We often read here that there is x% chance or y% of patients that clear or don't clear.  I'm not sure if you can get anything significant about a population when you have exhibited such different personal results in two treatments.  Sometimes we get a little clouded by the numbers, probablilites and data.  In the end, it's much more simple - either you clear or you don't.  It's easy to get caught in the mumbo jumbo and sometimes you need to just give what you can, do your best, sprint the last few hundred yards and then hope for the best as you roll the dice.

I've used my limit of metaphors for the day.

Good luck in your decision.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
238010 tn?1420409872
Like copyman said, there is no hard data to indicate longer tx will make a difference, especially if you are stage 1/2.  And to bali's point, what is making your doctor make this recommendation at week 41?  Your doctor's recommendation is baffling.

I did 88 weeks of tx and a 4 week taper and relapsed. But I don't regret it because I am stage 3/4 - your position is quite different.  I do certainly understand your wanting tx to end.

I feel for you being in this situation.  I would certainly grill my doctor about his/her reasoning for the recommendation if I were you.

Regarding the riba, did you see the recent study about riba/anemia and SVR?  
http://www.medhelp.org/posts/Hepatitis-C/Study-Anemia-in-treated-HCV-patients-bodes-well-for-sustained-virologic-response/show/1410985

BTW, I did the taper because I thought it might be beneficial in reducing long-term sx, not because it would affect my SVR chances.  I don't know for sure if tapering did anything because I have no basis for comparison.  But tapering makes sense to me and I plan to do it again next go round.

With an RVR, you are looking pretty good.  Crossing my fingers for your SVR.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
I wouldn't be afraid to stop at 52 weeks. I think you'll clear despite your previous relapse. Undetectable at week 4 is a very very strong predictor of SVR.
You cleared at week 4, your histology is decent, your anemia is a good sign and, aside from your relapse, I see no compelling reason to extend to 72 weeks. Does it increase your chances? Probably - but minimally so in my opinion.

I'm not competent to advise you how to proceed. I can only say that I would not be scared to stop at week 52 but, if you feel well enough, it certainly cannot hurt your chances to extend.

Good luck,
Mike
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
"I'm not competent to advise you how to proceed. I can only say that I would not be scared to stop at week 52 but, if you feel well enough, it certainly cannot hurt your chances to extend. "

I would come in somewhere around there in that go as far as you can, simply.  And I'm not competent, nor any of us, frankly to advise you how to proceed.  It's only our own opinions.  Tough, very tough to have to make a call like this.  In the end, you do the best you can with what you know and the rest is left up to "what will be will be".  

When my treatment got yanked at 34 weeks, I had the option to go off the trial and continue with a different medical team .. or simply stop.  It was agonizing to decide.  Agonizing.  Lots of opinions and very good ones.  However, in the end, it was all on my own shoulders and I had to make the final call, as do you.  I know what a tough spot that is to be in and my heart goes out to you.  Every situation has it's variables.

I would like to *suggest*...and only my own unlearned opinion....that you get to your 52 weeks and then simply continue to take it a step at a time.  You don't need to decide past that point and nor should you, because you will have to see how you're doing.  Something could change between now and then.  I understand goals.  It gives me the motivation to keep going to the next goalpoint.  And then set another one.  And so on.  I think you have a very good plan to aim for 52 weeks.  And then you can assess your situation as you approach that point.  I see no reason why you have to decide NOW to do 72 weeks.  

Even at that....things may come up between now and then that may change things yet again .. and you'll deal with them if they do.  If anything is constant when it comes to treatment....it's change.

Heart goes out to you ... however you have full support here for whatever you decide is best for YOU.  

Trish
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
thanks Trish.  I will be so glad when we have the drugs to eradicate this awful disease.  I wish this on no one.

Not even my sister in law.....
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
I am not treating exactly the same as last time.  High iron and ferritin last time.  I was told I should not have treated without getting it under control.  I did that and then started tx again.  It has since gone back up during tx, but I started in a different place.  could be why I was an rvr
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
LOL!!!!  You still have your sense of humour. That's a *great* sign. You're awesome...and you'll do fine.  
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
but trish, my ex husband may be a different story....
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
148588 tn?1465782409
"...what are your thoughts..."

Your doctor is covering his @$$ without much thought of what the consequences to you are.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
408795 tn?1324939275
I wouldn't be afraid to stop at 52 weeks. I think you'll clear despite your previous relapse. Undetectable at week 4 is a very very strong predictor of SVR.
________________________________________________________________________
I agree totally!  I would quit at 52 weeks, period.   Doctors are a trip!  All they know is what they see most of the time, in other words they have no idea what it feels like to go thru tx at all.  good luck!!
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
179856 tn?1333550962
And to bali's point, what is making your doctor make this recommendation at week 41? "

Maybe the doctor had just read what Spectda posted and it weighed on him heavily or something. I would certainly ask him what his logic is and what study information suggests that 52 will do anything more than 48 - certainly the code of conduct around here has always been Berg and S. Tapias but the latter is not applicable here in this case.

But I do agree that the interferon is already on board and adding a few more weeks isn't going to really do a darn thing at this point. I think those of us who developed autoimmune problems developed them way earlier than the 40s......

Can high iron vs. low iron really be the entire difference here in tx results?

It will be interesting to see how this works out.

QUESTION - did you have an earlier PCR last time other than the 11 week test?
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
nygirl

yes  i started at 5 mill  4 wk was 3k 8 wk was 187  11 wk was neg  

and the dr did not suggest 52 wks  i did  he suggested additional 24!
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
179856 tn?1333550962
Part of the problem really is that there is no guideline or study that has been done to support anything except extending to week 72.  When I had to extend (remember I had a great response but was stuck at 400 until somewhere after week 12 and before week 24 so not the same) I only wanted to do 60 but none of the doctors would agree to it because there was no protocol to support that going to 60 would do anything.

I am guessing your doc figures that since had to lower your riba and you are a relapser that the 72 gives you a better chance.  If you were not RVR it would not matter it would be automatic 72 but I guess there is just nothing to support anything else (and I did go to Dr. Ira Jacobson and that is what he told me, in my case, that I had to do the 48 or 72 there was nothing in between).

I really dont think doing 52 makes any difference from 48 but then again I'm not a doctor and only am basing it on the facts of what I just told you.  Maybe it has something to do with insurance approval too.

I am curious to know why he wants you to extend though as an RVR which we all wish we could have been but have not had that luck :(
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
i would think rvr would carry some weight......i tend to agree that considering my rvr, this letter was probably an *** covering letter.  I know drs have to follow protocol.  But if he truly felt I needed the extention, I believe he would have called me in his office to TALK me into it.  Instead I simply got documentation for the proverbial paper trail.

wish he would call!!!

Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
HE CALLED!!!

I pointed out my rvr. the study showing severe anemia was a predicator for svr.  The fact that this tx is tough for me.  I even corrected him on what week of tx I am in.  He thought I was further along.   I am convinced, he had not really paid any attention to my file and my stats.  I told him I would go as long as I could.  But I truly did not think i would make 24 more weeks.  He had a change of heart.  He said looking at my rvr, and the other records, he feels I should stop at 48,  I told him no.  I wanted to ride it out, but he said all indicators were good and if I did relapse, we would wait a year and revisit it.  He also said that in his 30 years of practice he had never had a relapser to become rvr the next tx.  geez,  I am worn out..
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
179856 tn?1333550962
He said looking at my rvr, and the other records, he feels I should stop at 48,"

Yes this what we all have said there is nothing else to ride out at week 48 you are done. There is no reason to do anything more than that, it's just overkill.

Glad you got your answer!
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
I guess that puts it in perspective.  The scripts stop after you complete the 48 weeks.  Unless you have something rock solid, I mean down right compelling to justify extending I'd say leave it as it is.  Less drama that way.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
979080 tn?1323437239
something I would do is run a Qualitative TMA test.
I am currently treating with the same doctor Nygirl treated with.
He believes in the TMA Qual as being the best for sensitivity.
Not TMA Quant (it gives too many false positives according to him)
TMA is a different amplification method and it can happen
that people are PCR negative but TMA positive after 48wks.
If TMA positive and PCR neg. you are more likely to relapse.
http://www.natap.org/2006/HCV/080106_03.htm

Also two TMA positives while PCR negative is not a good sign.

My Hep likes to run <43 Real Time PCR Quant  +  TMA Qual together same draw.

Since the TMA Qual has a detection limit of <10 , I still prefer the NGI QuantaSure
<2 but there is no direct comparison available , so I say just run them all.


After all what`s another VL test these days to make sure?

just a thought ......
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
Isn't it frustrating that we have to tell the drs what is going on?    THANK YOU ALL FOR TALKING ME THRU THIS!!!!  this board is more helpful than any dr!!!  I may relapse, but I don't think so.  If I do, I will tackle it with a pi, and when I am stronger.  at a weight in the low 100's, hgb hovering in the 7 and 8's.  neupogen kicking my butt every week.  an emotional wreck (not to mention my family).  It is time to get strong and have faith that i have it kicked.  I want to live like I am dying, not live like I am dead.  I have fought the good fight.  got 7 wks to go.  plz pray for me guys.]

and again.  thanks everyone for all your support.

Jean
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
"so I say just run them all."  What a revelation!  There is a thing called limited financial resources or insurance company approvals and denials.  Perhaps you've heard of that?

Trinity
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
I have been running the quantisure <2 throughout my tx, except the 4 wk  that was <43.  That is the TMA Qual?
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
Yeah.  I can run them all, but it would have to be at different times.  BCBS don't play that.

Jean
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
I meant What is the TMA Qual?
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
979080 tn?1323437239
FYI the tests you have been running (QuantSure) is the most expensive around approx $730 if you had to pay for it.
TMA Qualitative is done by Quest labs.
If Quest is covered by your insurance they will run the <43 PCR Quant together
with the TMA Qualitative <10 if your doctor gives you a lab requistion for it .

I have one of the lousiest insurances there is and if they will pick up the tab
I am sure BCBS will too.

It`s pretty easy to find out

Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
I dont want the <43 Quant .  I want the Quantisure..
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
979080 tn?1323437239
Me too , and in this case we both are negative using the QuantaSure.
As I said earlier running a different amplification method "TMA"could give
you extra reassurance.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
Oh.  I understand.  I will ask for it.  Thanks!
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
96938 tn?1189803458
Someone who wears a well-fitting belt (I had PCR done at 4wks, 12 wks, 24 wks and 36wks.  Did the ultra sensitive test  which test down to 2.)   does not need suspenders (I want the Quantisure) to hold up her pants.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
Very good point FLGuy!  Thanks!
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
419309 tn?1326506891
" I told him I would go as long as I could. "
-----
I think that's a good thought to hold on to ... once you get to the 48, anything after that is just 'icing on the cake' so to speak.  As long as YOU'RE satisfied in the end that you're done, you can be accepting of whatever the outcome.  Wishing you the best. ~eureka
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
338734 tn?1377163768
I would keep going for so many of the reasons already laid out very well by Trish, cando and others.  

I went 84 weeks. For me it was too depressing to think about the long-term goal. I just tried to go a week at a time and I was able to keep going. Your odds of success look very good with the 4 week RVR. Just think about being hep free in the end and how great it will be to put this whole thing behind you for good!

You only have to do one week at a time. you can do this.

Brent
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
I agree these doctors are a trip. sometimes they need to be put back in line. it was easy for him to tell you to do 72 weeks. If only he would have looked at your records and saw RVR if would have saved you a lot of grief.

well back to square one. If considering doing the extra 4 weeks maybe taper off the interferon. this will be the icing on the cake.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
the tapering makes sense to me, copyman.  what research have you done on this?

Jean
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
979080 tn?1323437239
thinking of tapering also , read the HR posts in the archives

problem is how do you get the extra INF  ?  It is expensive and even if your doctor
plays a long with a rx your insurance still needs to ok it
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
To each his own but I think tapering is pointless.  There is no peer reviewed clinical data to back it up.  When your done, your done.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
220090 tn?1379170787
I agree 100% with Trinity.  

I also think people should not give medical advice about length of treatment choices.  We are all lay people here.  We might know more than some doctors about some things, but in the end, we are amateurs and have no business recommending treatment options. It is one thing to say here are the options, make an informed choice.  It is quite another to say, I think you should do x.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
979080 tn?1323437239
I am always open to new approaches and share them with my experienced hepatologist
before I put anything into action.
Making "suggestions" like copyman did in reference to tapering for example helps keeping my mind open. I still need to discuss it with my Hep but if it were not
for other people helping to come up with ideas , they would most likely never
be on the table.
I discussed  predosing Riba and induction double dosing INF with my Hep and I
will discuss tapering as well. For that purpose I appreciate any additional
information anyone possibly has and I think Jt57 is interested in discussing it
as well.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
"He also said that in his 30 years of practice he had never had a relapser to become rvr the next tx."
=============================
That's fascinating........ I wasn't aware that they had been treating HCV for that many years.  They were actually only to test for and differentiate it just before 1990.

You also have to wonder..... in the "30 years" he has been treating HCV patients how far back he did 4 week PCRs?  My sense is that testing for RVR is a fairly recent protocol.

My comment is that I just had a friend complete a 48 week TX.  They had prior relapsed from a past from a 48 and 72 week treatment.  This time they RVR'ed and the 4 week EOT PCR said clear.  We will see what the 12 & 24  week PCR is, but I wanted you to understand that your case isn't one for the books.

I also wanted you to know that the "books" probably don't go back 30 years and that the 4 week PCR tests may be a rather recent phenomena.

Doctors professional opinion; good.

When they actually read your records and correctly interpret; priceless.

best,
Willy
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
220090 tn?1379170787
I can tell you from personal experience that 30 years ago, no one knew what HCV was.  I was diagnosed in 1987 with Non A Non B hepatitis.  HCV was discovered in teh early 90s, but there were no PCR tests.  By the mid 90s, there were PCR tests, but no Riba until 1996 but withour pegylated interferon.  Finally Pegylated interferon and weight based Riba came along and presto, many prior relapsers became SVR.  Then, response based treatment was put in practice and again -- better results including prior relapsers.

So far, I have not seen a single study or even a valid theory that says tapering Interferon produces better results.   I am an amateur and I don't read as much as I used to now that I am SVR.  It is possible that I missed a paper on tapering Interferon, but it has never been presented at any of the major conferences.  If anyone has a study they think makes a valid case for tapering, I would greatly appreciate a link to it.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
Very good points about hep c testing time frame.  I was (needle) stuck in a hospital setting 1994 and had to insist on a 6 months HIV - my hep couldn't believe that they didn't test me for Hep C.  Guess what, even as an RN CEN, I didn't know about Hep C at that time or you could bet I'd made them test.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
220090 tn?1379170787
The latest studies posted by vertex show that prior relapsers that do a course of Telaprevir plus SOC for 12 weeks followed by an additional 36 weeks of SOC have an 83 - 90% chance of SVR.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
Woohoo!   Tick...tick....tick
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
179856 tn?1333550962
Wow now those is some great big fat marvelous numbers arent they?

BEAUTY!
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
I think my doc was referring to the fact that he had been practicing for 30 yrs.  Maybe i did not communicate it correctly.  I did not say my case was one for the books, nor did he.  He stated that he personally had never had a patient respond the way I have.  

I think all of us are aware of when Hep c was actually acknowledged as a disease and testing began, hence treating.  We all have hep c, right?   And I don't think the people on this forum are giving medical advice....they are giving medical opinions, which I appreciate.  Most of them follow up that opinion with a disclaimer...

I do my own research before making my decisions.  I would like to know more about the tapering off because it makes logical sense to me.Any info anyone has on it I would appreciate.

Jean
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
979080 tn?1323437239
You can find a lot of discussion about tapering in the archives.
Here is something I just dug up , originally posted by Orleans in 2009

Hepatology. 1996 Jul;24(1):21-6.

Improved sustained response following treatment of chronic hepatitis C by gradual
reduction in the interferon dose.

Shiffman ML, Hofmann CM, Luketic VA, Sanyal AJ, Contos MJ, Mills AS.

Hepatology Section, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, Va 23298, USA.

Interferon (IFN) treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) is associated with
a high rate of relapse. IFN is thought to exert its effect against HCV via direct
viral inhibition and immune stimulation. We have hypothesized that relapse
following termination of therapy results from the sudden withdrawal of this
immune modulatory effect and that gradual reduction in the IFN dose may decrease
the incidence of relapse. One hundred six patients with chronic HCV were enrolled
into this 24-month controlled, randomized prospective trial. All were treated
with 5 mU of interferon-alpha-2b three times a week for 6 months. Patients who
achieved biochemical response were randomized to either stop or taper IFN
gradually at monthly intervals as follows; 3 mu, 2 mU, 1 mU, and 0.5 mU (all
three times a week). 0.5 mU twice weekly and then once weekly. Liver histology
was assessed by Knodell index and HCV RNA was measured by a quantitative
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. Of the 92 patients who completed the
initial 6 months of IFN treatment, 47 (51%) achieved biochemical response.
Twenty-one of these patients were randomized to stop IFN treatment and 25 to
taper (1 drop-out). At randomization patients were well matched with respect to
age, sex, race, serum alanine transaminase (ALT), and liver histology.
Biochemical relapse was observed in 19 of 21 (91%) patients who stopped IFN
treatment compared with only 60% who tapered IFN (P= .04).

Virological relapse
occurred in 90% of patients who stopped and only 48% of persons who tapered IFN
therapy.

At completion of the 24-month study patients who achieved long-term
sustained biochemical response had a significantly lower mean Knodell score (3.5
vs. 6.5) and a significantly greater number were HCV RNA negative in serum (85%
vs. 18%) compared with relapsers.

We conclude that gradual reduction in IFN dose
is associated with a  SIGNIFICANT HIGHER RATE OF SUSTAINED RESPONSE and clearance
of HCV RNA from serum compared with abruptly stopping treatment. This in turn is
associated with a significant improvement in hepatic histology supporting the
premise that response to IFN therapy can prevent progression to cirrhosis.




Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
thanks!  Do you know how gradually this was done?  Over 4 wks, 8 wks, ?

Jean
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
179856 tn?1333550962
Most of that info is very very old and as far as I remember we all sort of disregarded it as being necessary or anything a long while back.

If the job of interferon is so that when it's stopped your bodies immune system is 'kick started' into working it sort of seems opposite to me....tapering it slowly wouldn't give you that kick start.  At this point in almost 2011 they would know if it really was viable and most top docs would be doing it but I dont know of any that are.

As for someone (me) who had either a false neg at my EOT week 4 of 63 or something but since then has maintainned SVR - I will always believe that it was the fact that it took my immune system a little while to kick start in after treatment but that it did. But that is typical of my course since I had two strains and couldn't get to UND to save my life (except when it finally was necessary I've always been stubborn). ;)

Just my opinion though but I dont think anybody really practices this any longer.  
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
Sorry if I was snarky about the doctoring.  IMHO your doctor originally seemed to be undervaluing the RVR.

As of late that seems to be about the very best predictor of SVR.

Here are a few links. There is talk about an RVR being used to determine if a 24 week TX is sufficient. for geno 1's

Yes.... you relapsed and no one wants that to happen again, but for instance...... in the Telaprevir trials the most likely person to succeed isn't a TX naive, it is a past RESPONDER that relapsed.  It isn't such a stretch that you RVR'ed.

http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/hep_c/news/2008/101408_b.html

http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/hep_c/news/2010/0903_2010_a.html

There are other links on the subject, papers at AASLD or EASL.

It is a tough call but there is some evidence that suggests you have done enough at 48 weeks.  The evidence may get sketchy trying to find proof that adding 24 weeks will change the outcome.  There are people who do become injured through exposure to SOC. See the black box warnings that accompany the drugs.  One would think that greater/ longer exposure might equal greater risk.

best,
Willy
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
979080 tn?1323437239
maybe copyman knows more , looks like he was part of a lot of those discussions back than , also merrybe is very knowledgable about the old HR posts..
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
Tapering did not work to merrybe or smaug's advantage.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
179856 tn?1333550962
Copy succeeded after relapse (thank GOD finally) with boce and merry is a relapser herself....these drugs are hard core and personally if you dont need to extend I cannot see why staying on them just for the heck of it.  Look at all the folks who did extend and yet did not succeed? I agree with Willy that RVR seems to trump everything these days as a predictor.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
96938 tn?1189803458
My recollection of the tapering, without reffering back to previous posts, was that the subsequent tapering was AFTER the full course of treatment and not replacing the later SOC weeks with less Peg.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
220090 tn?1379170787
Thanks for the clarification.

As far as advice is concerned, anyone that reads the forum for awhile will see that some people have strong opinions and others present the data and let people decide for them self.  On the other side, some people believe what they want to hear, so for example, saying that it's ok to stop treating might cause someone to take the advice if they were having a hard time and wanted to stop.  Many of the opinions are truly well informed and in many cases more so than most doctors.  Some others are not well formed opinions.

This is true for both doctors and people on this forum.  It is nice to think that the licensing and education required for doctors would make them all perfect, but we all know that is not true.  I do think that the licensing and education requirements make it more likely that doctors are better qualified to give advice than most people on this forum.  

Differentiating between medical advice and opinions is splitting hairs in my opinion.  The biggest danger in taking forum advice or opinions is that we on the forum do not get to see the patient or all the data and (jokingly) we are idiot savants medically: we know a lot about a little (HCV).  The doctor gets to see the entire patient and has training on how to evaluate all the data.  Not just HCV statistics.

Using myself for example, during the Telaprevir trail, I was undetectable by the end of week 2.  I wanted to stop at 24 weeks, but Dr Dieterich said I should go the entire 48 weeks.  I believe that discussion here would have produced many opinions telling me to stop at 24.  Dr D said that because of my age, 67 at the time, he felt that my immune system was weaker than the average trial person and that I stood a very high chance of SVR if I went 48 weeks.  I took that advice and I am SVR.  Of course, no one knows what would have happened if I stopped, but looking at the trial results now that they are published, I increased the odds of SVR by staying on for 48 weeks.  I bet that once the data are refined, age will be a determining factor in lengthening treatment.

Eric
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
979080 tn?1323437239
Copyman stated earlier in this thread he believed in it and that he knew others
who had success with it.
Would be interesting to know what kind of tapering schedule was done after EOT.

The only reason I am entertaining the idea is that I have no reason to believe
it will harm but could maybe help. If it is not for relapse maybe with post
side effect issues arising from INF withdrawl so to speak.
Of course it is all a guess...but I appreciate the open discussion and everybody`s
viewpoint and experience
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
If interferon withdrawl was real then everyone would experience it without expection and they don't.  I didn't after 72 weeks of the stuff and many many other haven't either.

Trinity

Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
flguy is correct, the taper was in addition to the full course, i did it, did it help? who knows, i had the inf, so why not
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
I guess the word "withdrawl" is subjective.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
179856 tn?1333550962
I believe that discussion here would have produced many opinions telling me to stop at 24."

HA you know which camp I would have been in............I am glad you stayed on the full 48, just in case it did matter ;) cause now you never have to worry about it again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   :)

And yes of course the idea of tapering is in addition to the full SOC that was a very good point for FLG to point out. Personally I think it's overkill (and that coming from a 72 weeker) but sort of like if you taper down slowly to nothing isn't that sort of like not doing the interferon ever at all? Interferon doesn't kill the virus it trains our immune systems to do so - wouldn't it be like untrainning your immune system?.......it just doesn't make sense to me but then again that's just me.

Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
as to getting the extra interferon to taper off, you have to tell a little white lie. something like two syringes were broke during shipment, etc etc.

you get the idea.......
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
979080 tn?1323437239
man am i getting forgetful , i think i left it on the backseat of a NYC taxi cab a long
with the additional Riba....

just kidding.....

I discussed the issue of tapering before (different forum) and I am getting more
prepared now for my wk36 meeting with my Hep when I will put it on the table.

When I originally "signed up for tx" the PA confirmed that they would taper me of
if I wanted to , of course that guy is no longer there now.....
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
238010 tn?1420409872
Here is the thread where HR presented his ideas on tapering.  

http://tinyurl.com/98fstf

In that thread HR also posted the following (albeit a study from 1996, which makes one wonder why more follow-ups were not done):

Hepatology. 1996 Jul;24(1):21-6.

Improved sustained response following treatment of chronic hepatitis C by gradual
reduction in the interferon dose.

Shiffman ML, Hofmann CM, Luketic VA, Sanyal AJ, Contos MJ, Mills AS.

Hepatology Section, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, Va 23298, USA.

Interferon (IFN) treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) is associated with
a high rate of relapse. IFN is thought to exert its effect against HCV via direct
viral inhibition and immune stimulation. We have hypothesized that relapse
following termination of therapy results from the sudden withdrawal of this
immune modulatory effect and that gradual reduction in the IFN dose may decrease
the incidence of relapse. One hundred six patients with chronic HCV were enrolled
into this 24-month controlled, randomized prospective trial. All were treated
with 5 mU of interferon-alpha-2b three times a week for 6 months. Patients who
achieved biochemical response were randomized to either stop or taper IFN
gradually at monthly intervals as follows; 3 mu, 2 mU, 1 mU, and 0.5 mU (all
three times a week). 0.5 mU twice weekly and then once weekly. Liver histology
was assessed by Knodell index and HCV RNA was measured by a quantitative
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. Of the 92 patients who completed the
initial 6 months of IFN treatment, 47 (51%) achieved biochemical response.
Twenty-one of these patients were randomized to stop IFN treatment and 25 to
taper (1 drop-out). At randomization patients were well matched with respect to
age, sex, race, serum alanine transaminase (ALT), and liver histology.
Biochemical relapse was observed in 19 of 21 (91%) patients who stopped IFN
treatment compared with only 60% who tapered IFN (P= .04).

Virological relapse
occurred in 90% of patients who stopped and only 48% of persons who tapered IFN
therapy.

At completion of the 24-month study patients who achieved long-term
sustained biochemical response had a significantly lower mean Knodell score (3.5
vs. 6.5) and a significantly greater number were HCV RNA negative in serum (85%
vs. 18%) compared with relapsers.

We conclude that gradual reduction in IFN dose
is associated with a  SIGNIFICANT HIGHER RATE OF SUSTAINED RESPONSE and clearance
of HCV RNA from serum compared with abruptly stopping treatment. This in turn is
associated with a significant improvement in hepatic histology supporting the
premise that response to IFN therapy can prevent progression to cirrhosis.  
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Comment
Post Comment
Avatar universal
Withdrawals is a very big reason i think tapering makes sense.  When I stopped tx before, I definately had withdrawals.  They were awful.  I dont know if it was from the ribavirin, interferon, procrit......you get the idea.  I'm leaning toward the ribavirin, simply because it was a drug I took daily for 48 wks.  So yes, I would like to know more about tapering, not just for my immune system, but for the withdrawals.  On everyday rx, they usually state, "do not stop taking this drug abruptly".   Im thinking there is a reason.  But Im going with RVR.  My money is on it.  I do know there is no guarantee.  But Im going to take my chances.

Thanks to you all..

Jean
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal