This forum is for questions about medical issues and research aspects of
Hepatitis C such as, questions about being newly diagnosed, questions about current treatments, information and participation in discussions about research studies and clinical trials related to Hepatitis. If you would like to communicate with other people who have been touched by Hepatitis, please visit our new
Hepatitis Social/Living with Hepatitis forum
best to you
In Jan 2002, I went over the mts to a big city spl 7 right before I left, I got the news I was treatable & a 2b. I started tx in May and cl'ed in 18days. fin tx and am still svr (test was to 200 not 50. I was transfused in '67 in Alaska.
I called my doc and yesterday he answered and said that their was nothing else he could do to improve the liver, only have the symptoms treated. Some damage can improve b/mostly the liver is just stabalized w/no further damage (hopefully).
Stay on the transplant list. I'm not going that route b/w/or w/o svr, you still might need that liver.
Whether or not you would need to be on the transplant list, is determined by your liver FUNCTION.
(How well your liver is functioning)
Here's some things that you might already know:
Inflammation can cause fibrosis (abnormal fibrous bands in the liver).....
Fibrosis can lead to scar tissue (cirrhosis)....
and as the liver attempts to regenerate, abnormal NODULES grow between the fibrous bands.
As time goes by, and more and more nodules appear in the liver, the architecture of the liver can become more and more distorted.
This distortion can interfere with blood flow (causing Portal Hypertension)
Cirrhosis has three stages:
---stage A (compensated cirrhosis)
---stage B (the beginning of decompensation)
---stage C (decompensated cirrhosis)
A person with Stage B cirrhosis, is starting to show the physical effects of portal hypertension. (Ascites and/or varices)
A person with Stage C cirrhosis has so much damage (so much distortion) that ---- along with the problems of portal hypertension--- their liver FUNCTION declines. (the liver can't produce enough Albumin for the body)
--- Ok, now keep in mind that a person can get on the transplant list if they have Stage B --OR-- Stage C cirrhosis.
(I'm not sure which one is your situation.)
--------- If you are Stage B cirrhosis, and you were to stop further damage from occurring (by clearing the virus, and taking very good care of yourself), perhaps you could turn this thing around.
--------- If you are Stage C cirrhosis (decompensated), even if you stopped the virus, you still need a transplant.
Hippiemom--- This is just intended to help you understand the reasoning behind some of this. (So that you'll know what to discuss with your doctor.)
If I were you, here's some things I would do:
1. Keep track of your bloodtests for Albumin, Bilirubin, and INR (or PT). Watch for any changes in those numbers. (Those are the numbers used to gauge liver FUNCTION)
2. Follow a low sodium diet, and take the medications your doctor prescribes (example- you may be taking a beta-blocker to reduce portal hypertension, or you may be taking diuretics to control edema, or you may be taking lactulose to control ammonia,... etc.)
3. Don't take anything (even over-the-counter meds or supplements) UNLESS you have your hepatologist's approval
4. Make a list of questions that are on your mind, and have your hepatologist go over them with you.
Here's wishing all the best to you
(((((Congratulations on being Undetectable)))))
My condition is similar to that of imkindly.
HepC positive with 3b and viral load of 29,000 copies/mL.
Cirrhosis- well compensated.
liver is smaller in size, few nodules seen, no acites (ascites), suspected varices (blue coloration on a small region of oesophagus), Spleen is normal in size
However, did not get biopsy done.
since diagnosis (May 1, 04)
On low sodium and low protein diet
On lactulose, aldactone and Nexium.
Started treatment 5 weeks ago with Peg-Intron and Riba.
A major difference after 2 months is that ,edema disappeared, which I had for 4 years.
Still very very fatigued, and sides are not too kind with me.
Reading the reports on reversal of cirrhosis, and reading Sojourn's story, I am hoping that I will not need a liver transplant. This hope is based on the fact that it takes 5-7 years to go from stage 1 (compensated) to stage 2 (beginning of decompensation).
However, reports also say that it is highly likely that SVR is attainable for patients with 3b, with low viral load, below 60 years of age , provided they are cirrhosis free----
So in my case (3b and Cirrhosis) time will be the best answer.
So bottom line, you need to get to know the stage of liver damage.
- Sunag
By the way, Rev:Thanks for B-Day wishes, but the election speach was out of hand. You are nuts. I could never see you in public office. It would be like what you see on those news reports, when a argument breaks out in the Chinese government.. Chaos!!! I see you as the pissed off postal worker, or the insurance guy that takes out the whole office. Actually, no, I see you as Larry Flint type, sitting in front of judge in a depends under garmet, and a f*ck America shirt!!! Ha ha ha ha
Hope you have a great day!!
Enigma
Love to all, Joni
Samm
If you're stage C, yes.
If you're stage B, hopefully not.
It is irresponsible of us to state beliefs as facts not supported by statistics. we mostly state our personal experience with the procedures and meds backed with the background info from researching it. In a year 1/2 reading here, I have not heard of any complications needing hospitalization.
You deal with coinfected patients, the biopsy outcome and its stats might be different for them, i don't know, their stats cannot be generalized to all HCV monoinfected.
be well
Many are choosing to wait on starting tx based on their bx result, many are choosing to tx on the same basis. From your words I gather all should tx based only on HVC infection and that is an advise we can give to all without discouraging their wish for the bx. A good radiologist can make a complicated procedure, simple.
I wish the best to you on your way to recovering your good health.
I am appalled at the speed your infection has progressed, what do drs say to that rare event? Are you positive it was only last year? I have not read of anyone posting here progressing like that in a matter of months from the time of infection.wow.
Be well
Some of the people on this forum (Kalio, for one) have had them done. There is a doctor, Hepatitis Researcher, who occasionally visits this forum, who actually has the machine.
Generally, the only reason to treat with ESLD is to hopefully become undetectable before transplant.
Treatment has never been linked to a reduction in portal hypertension in cirrhotics as far as I know. It HAS been linked to pushing compensated cirrhotics into decompensation and ESLD, and is contraindicated in those with ESLD. However, many hepatologists are treating those with ESLD. Others won't. My doc developed LADR (low accelerating dose regimen) for those with ESLD. He has met with success in clearing those pre-tp and maintaining SVR post-tp. The numbers aren't great yet, but at least there is some hope against re-infection post-tp.
The only way to get taken off the list is by choice, or the failure to meet the minimum requirements required for listing at your tp center. A minimum of a MELD score of 6 is the lowest UNOS requires.
Best regards,
Mr Liver
I was fortunate enough to have the ear of Dr Shiffman in May. He is one of the lead investigators on the HALT C Trials. Here are some of the things he told me. By the way, the HALT C info is going to be presented for the first time at AASLD in November. He said that approximately 80% of cirrhotics are still doing well 10 years after diagnosis. During the trials they biopsied 100's of patients at the start and finish of treatment and 5 years later. This is what they found. If a person was Stage 4, and they got an SVR, 5 years after treatment ended, 20% have a reduction in fibrosis, usually just one stage. If they were Stage 3, 80% had a small reduction. If they had minimal fibrosis, Stage 1 or 2, all of them had a reduction in fibrosis, some of them to Stage 0.
Also, biopsy is important for those who do not want to treat unless they have lots of liver damaqe. There are peoople who can pinpoint when they were infected. If biopsy shows Stasge 1 20 or 30 years later, they can safely choose not to do treatment at this time and maybe never. I am very pro treatment personally but I would never push anyone with a small amount of dammage to do it if they've had the disease a long time. Only 20% or so of patients will progress if not treated. That leaves a lot of people, if they take care of themselves, to do quite well, grow old, and die of something else.
Please be careful of all information on the internet. Always check with your doctor.
If I were a geno 1 and out to treat for 48 or 72 weeks, though, I would want to know what condition my liver were in before starting. I don't think biopsies for geno 1's who have bled is an irresponsible approach at all, and in general (if their liver is compensated, inr and platelets not at dangerous levels, etc.) I would not discourage someone in that situation from getting one if they were leaning towards tx and wanted more information to make the decision.
just thought I'd let you know.
I've been worried about the old dates popping up. Not sure how folks are finding them.
Probably trolling through nursing homes and retirement trailer parks, plying the oldies with promises of prune exilyr.
Or maybe Geritol with Viagra - that's how you get and old date to pop up.
Good one --- never even saw that one coming.... LMAO!
Still an interesting thread. Even the additions got interesting.
Goofy your are nuts, probably why i like your posts.
CS
Those in CTP classification of A have a 2-year survival rate of 85%. Those in the A group have to have abnormal labs on the only 3 blood values they measure for the CTP. The prognostic values are right below the ABC table on this link. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child-Pugh_score
Mr Liver
Regards,
Mr Liver
I think :)