i Recently go to hospital for gall bladder stone checkup doctors advised me to operate this through leproscopy and when test are taken then Anti HCV found boderline and after 6 weeks when again test taken then HCV is diagnosed and its value recorded 13.22 and when HCV Qualitative PCR test taken then its result shows detected. detailed reports are attached this question for other blood samples also., please advise me what to do and at what stage my disese.
The tests taken only confirm you are infected with the hcv ,it does not tell you how much damage your liver has incurred because of your infection, further testing must be done to grade and stage your liver disease most people choose a biopsy of the liver,I did mine the same time I had my gallbladder removed, there are other methods to give a snapshot of your damage but a biopsy has been the gold standard, how you choose to accurately grade your disease is up to you and your doc,but the importand thing is getting rid of this disease and working on getting your health back. Please for your own sake...NO ALCOHOL and start educating yourself on your treatment options and don't just jump into the first RX your doc throws at you,learn about what your going to take and post his recommendations so you can get valuable feedback on the choice hes made for you....good luck
Posted by myself in an earlier thread today addressing the member mikesimons article copied regarding the diminishing use of biopsy by many noted Hepatologists in light of the change in treatment for HCV(below):
Advising the Patient
In a nutshell, my answers were: 1) no, a biopsy is not essential, and 2) maybe you will need interferon, but if your liver is in good shape, then you can wait. My response may seem a bit paradoxical—I care very much about the liver disease stage when making a decision to treat or wait but I don’t think we need a piece of liver tissue to get the information. I still recommend a fair number of liver biopsies but, with interferon-free, all-oral therapies on the near-term horizon (2014?), I am increasingly comfortable relying on patient history, physical exam, routine laboratory tests, and liver imaging as well as noninvasive serum markers to obtain a picture of liver health. In the United States, we do not yet have routine access to transient elastography but, in many regions, this would also be a mainstay of liver staging.
It seems many Hepa's have been adopting this attitude ,negating the need often for biopsy ,,especially in light of new treatment paradigms.
It was good to see that the FDA has finally aprroved the Fibroscan .as we have been using it relatively succesfully in Canada for years,often in combination with the "Fibrosure" blood marker.
Copyright 1994-2016 MedHelp International. All rights reserved.
MedHelp is a division of Aptus Health.
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.