I was just diagnosed last week with hepatitis c. I have no health insurance so I am going through the "charity" hospital. My doctor has ordered an ultrasound as oppose to a liver biopsy. That being said my AST was 413 and ALT1181. Doctor was really surprised that my enzymes were that high. I am otherwise in good health. My question is, would an ultrasound be sufficient enough to see what kind of damage my liver has so far?
just recently joined here myself. i hope mentally you are dealing with it well. my first hep dr did both. but as far as the only thing no my dr said she had to do both. it was scary but it wasnt that bad. i would just ask if it were me.. hope it helps...
"My question is, would an ultrasound be sufficient enough to see what kind of damage my liver has so far?"
No, an ultrasound will be able to tell you whether you have cirrhosis or not but is not a good tool for grading and staging fibrosis, I had a perfectly fine ct scan and was diagnosed stage 3 grade 2 through biopsy
While an ultrasound can show a good amount of information, keep in mind that it won't be a complete picture. Nothing beats actual "eyes on" My husband was diagnosed with HCV in Dec 12 and in Feb 13 he finally had a liver biopsy. The ultrasound did not show any inflamation and combined with other liver tests we felt at the time that the damage was minimal to his liver. When we finally got the liver biopsy results back we were devastated when we were told he was already stage 4. This may sound rather extreme and maybe it is. But also remember that a liver biopsy is only going to show that "spot" of the liver it was taken from. It does not mean that it is uniformly damaged at that stage.
Hi , you will need to have a biopsy , ultrasound and then probably a fibroscan could be misleading as you have high liver reading , alt etc , your fibroscan may show a higher reading .
I have had high alt etc readings for a long time , about a year and half ago I had a fibroscan and had a score of 16 ( cirhossis ) which scared me . I then had a biopsy which showed stage 2 fibrosis .
I have another fibroscan coming up in 6 months to be honest I have lost trust in those machines . I will probably have a biopsy again in a couple of years , but hopefully not if something good comes out ( non interferon ) for genotype 1 null responders .
Welcome to the forum! I just wanted to add support to what you've already heard: no, an ultrasound is not adequate! Some doctors seem to want to believe they are, maybe its a cost-saving mentality, or maybe they think they are shielding patients from painful procedures (a biopsy is not that bad), I don't know what it is. My own hepatologist, who as former head of liver transplant at Stanford University Hospital, ought to have known better, allowed me to go 14 years between biopsies just because my ultrasounds looked okay. When I had major surgery for a choledochal cyst they were shocked by the horrible condition of my liver, biopsied it, and diagnosed cirrhosis. I woke up to the news that I should get my life in order. Before that surgery I had still been consuming wine with most dinners, in the belief that my liver was still not being damaged by the HCV, when in fact it was nearing the end of the road. After surgery I totally stopped all alcohol and reformed my eating habits and OTC meds as well, and my cirrhotic liver has held up as compensated cirrhosis for 9 years now. Last year I completed the triple tx (my third try at treating the HCV) and as of March 2013 I am SVR.
My point is that it is very foolish to trust in ultrasounds for liver condition. I think they really tend to see what they expect to see. When my medical records only included my first biopsy, with very little damage, the ultrasounds always looked smooth to them, right up to and including the last one done a few months before surgery. After surgery, when my records clearly stated cirrhosis, the ultrasounds have all shown an uneven heterogenous texture. Ultrasounds are great as screening tools for liver cancer, but they really suck at visualizing fibrosis or cirrhosis.
I have HCV and Genotype 1b. Not a good genotype for interferon treatment and now that I am stage 3 (from liver biopsy this year), I was just about to begin the triple therapy. However, this week my doctor recommended me to a phase III non-interferon oral medication clinical trial. There have been great results for 1b in some trials 80 to 100% cure with many fewer side effects. Has anybody out there participated in such a clinical trial? I guess I will join this community and post some updates.
Here is an article that I have posted in my journals. It was originally shared with us here on the forum by a forum member named specda. It gives some information about criteria for evaluating clinical trials and making sure an individual trial is in your best interest:
You've probably figured this out by now, but just is case: we have a lot if forum members who've been in the non-interferon drug trials and results seem to be excellent at this point. I'm not one of them, having just successfully completed the triple tx and having achieved SVR, so I can't give you a lot of details on the new drugs. If you search within medhelp I'm sure you will find some of the threads, but if you have trouble then try posting a new question about it - that's the best way to get attention. Good luck!
Copyright 1994-2016 MedHelp International. All rights reserved.
MedHelp is a division of Aptus Health.
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.