This forum is for questions about medical issues and research aspects of
Hepatitis C such as, questions about being newly diagnosed, questions about current treatments, information and participation in discussions about research studies and clinical trials related to Hepatitis. If you would like to communicate with other people who have been touched by Hepatitis, please visit our new
Hepatitis Social/Living with Hepatitis forum
Assuming you're a geno 1, you do realize that since you were detectible at week 12, you probably will have to treat a total of 72 weeks for a decent chance of SVR. That's assuming you become non-detectible at week 24. I understand you are committed to treatment at this point, but that's something you should weigh in the context of the difficulties you're having, especially if you do not have significant liver damage.
All the best.
-- Jim
If you could have held out 4 more weeks before reducing (and again I would have perhaps dropped one RIBA pill if I HAD to either quit tx or reduce) you could have seen if you were UND at 24.
Because after week 24 the odds of achieving SVR are VERY VERY low. In fact both doctors I went to would not consider treating me past that if I had not come up UND by then. One is a world reknown NYC doc as well and he is the one who advised me treating for 72 weeks (I was UND between 12 and 24).
What I guess I'm trying to say is...since it seems to me that the doctor has already botched this up (IN MY OPINION OF COURSE)...I might stop and regroup.
Give your body a rest and if you have time see what is coming down the road. I can't remember your stage and grade but - right now you CAN live with the 8.6 hgb if you had to but who wants to?
For that to IMPROVE he should have dose reduced you there - but he didn't. Makes no sense to me at all.
I was taking too much Riba (I requested one extra a day LOL) and my hemo was horrible all through tx and I was on major epogen - when Dr. J in NY had me drop one riba (at week 46) my hemo went straight up to 12.2 even though I REDUCED the epo to only 40,000 a week!
So you might have had a good shot at succeeding if you had dropped the pill - but not the shot and since there is no guarantee you could ever achieve SVR AFTER week 24 (remember they base on how FAST we get to UND) I think I'd take a rest and maybe try again afterwards.
Or try and get in a trial like Mr. Beagle Bailey who simply cannot do the Ribavirin.
My bestest of bestest to you. This disease sucks it just sucks.
--------------
As stated above, my medical team rarely uses Neupogen, and then only if ANC is below 300 and stays there awhile. 500 is probably a more common number for intervention, but my doctor has treated hundreds of hep c patients as well as being involved in research and trials. In case you missed it, I posted a link, above, to a study that suggests that inteferon-induced Neutropenia (low wbc) does not correlate with higher infection rates. You might want to print this out and bring it to your doctor.
All the best.
-- Jim
I guess some of the factors one needs to consider with these rescue meds is that their usage is very dependant upon the health of the patient. If one is at risk of or has medical conditions which makes it's usage risky, then doc may prefer to avoid them. As a patient, I would want to know why doc is not prescribing and what alternatives they see to allow me attempt SVR success.
Guess ever Doc has different guidlines..
But the reason I assume your Doc is lowering meds, is because of platlets. And a dose reduction is the ONLY way to get those to rebound.
http://www.labtestsonline.org/understanding/analytes/cbc/glance.html
Those are the two main blood tests for rescue drugs. I know MissMiss had nemenga for her low platelets, at 40, but not many dr's do this I hear. Neumega has brutal sx. Neulasta has brutal sx too!
Thanks, Char
Thanks to everyone for all the information. I have a better understanding and a whole bunch of questions for my hep doc. It's so frustrating - I guess it just shows how much "they" still need to learn about this virus/disease.
If it is anything like Neulasta ( time released Neupogen) Aranesp may be stronger and help keep that Hgb higher. I sure would give it a try if you aren't getting results from Procrit. Neulasta is so strong it knocks me down for a week. I have heard neupogen isn't so strong and sx aren't bad, so I will try it. I
I never had any sx from the Aranesp. All it did was help my anemia go away and feel better. I no longer need it after several months of it. My Hgb is holding at 12.