Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
 | 

Riba test

by Jakied, Mar 22, 2007 12:00AM
Can someone explain the difference between the screening test and the Riba test for Hcv?

From what I understand, the screening test is accurate for high risk populations, mainly Idu and pre 1992 blood transfusions.  The screening test is not so accurate for low risk populations so a reactive outcome on the screening test has to be confirmed with Riba test, which is very specific for Hcv.  Both tests check for antibody to Hcv, not the virus itself.  the pcr test is for the virus.  Neg Riba is a neg outcome for Hcv antibody.  

Am i correct in this?  Any advice is MUCH appreciated.  Good luck to all on treatment.  I know that is not easy.  Winston Churchill said, 'when you are going through hell, keep going.'
Member Comments (4)

by nygirl7, Mar 22, 2007 12:00AM
I've never heard of a Riba test so I don't know what to say. Riba(virin) is a medicine.

by kfranke, Mar 26, 2007 12:00AM
From my understanding the Riba test is VERY specific for Hep C.   I had one done and was told that it would determine without a doubt if you the antibodies for HEP C.  (Yeah right, mine was indeterminate but that's a whole other story!)

I'm not sure if this answered your question but I was told that the Riba 3.0 was pretty much the gold standard in antibody testing.   Negative would for sure be negative.

by NicksmyName, Mar 26, 2007 12:00AM
The screening tests are 3rd generation tests and are extremely sensitive.  You need to be to pull infected samples out of a healthy population.  The RIBA is similar to a western blot used to comfirm HIV infection.  The RIBA was developed for the same purpose to confirm HCV infection when you get a postive result on your HCV EIA test.  The test was developed bachk when the HCV EIAs were not as sensitve as today.  Todays HCV 3rd gen EIA test are more sensitive than RIBA.  The NIH guidelines of HCV do not recommend using it as aconfirm for this reason (there are still recommendations for use in certain situations- pos HCV EIA and Neg HCV RNA)  A qual RNA test is a better choice to confirm.

by Jakied, Mar 27, 2007 12:00AM
I believe the Riba is more specific for Hcv than Elisa.  Would you say someone with this result is neg?

Screening test 1.0 score
neg riba
neg pcr qualitative
Related discussions
Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
Recent Activity
charm27 is praying
Eddakit not feeling so hot about life today
aheart On Holiday Finally!
GSDgirl is sad. My old pony died, he was 40
BklynBoy81 SVR!!!!!!
stubby226 commented on Happy Thanksgiving
14 hrs ago
nygirl7 Izzy IS :) & so upset for Smaug :(
justme53 commented on cancer and hep c
17 hrs ago
RSS Expert Activity
Sad cases of Animal Cruelty
23 hrs ago by Thomas Dock, Vet. Technician
Cost and Availablity of Medical Car...
Dec 17 by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS
Behavior Medications for our Pets -... 
Dec 17 by Jim Humphries, B.S., D.V.M.
Community Members