Nutrition Health Chat: Tuesday, Dec. 8th, 5-6 PM Eastern. Learn how vitamins, minerals, and phytonutrients affect your health. Free live Q&A. Join us!
Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum. ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
This forum is for questions about medical issues and research aspects of Hepatitis C such as, questions about being newly diagnosed, questions about current treatments, information and participation in discussions about research studies and clinical trials related to Hepatitis. If you would like to communicate with other people who have been touched by Hepatitis, please visit our new Hepatitis Social/Living with Hepatitis forum
I found it. I really don't know what to make of it. When I see that the Veterans are involved I think Walter Reed and my confidence level drops. The 40% number does not conform to any previous studies I have seen and I have seen them sponsored by both Roche and Schering Plough and you'd think that one or both of those would show a big advantage for their drug but my recollection is that they didn't. The differences were marginal. I liked PegasysPegasys because it was easier for me to tolerate and if the numbers reflect patients discontinuing due to sides that may explain the disparity between the two. I am at a loss and will ait for someone smarter to enlighten me. Mike
Ron