This forum is for questions about medical issues and research aspects of
Hepatitis C such as, questions about being newly diagnosed, questions about current treatments, information and participation in discussions about research studies and clinical trials related to Hepatitis. If you would like to communicate with other people who have been touched by Hepatitis, please visit our new
Hepatitis Social/Living with Hepatitis forum
http://www.prnewswire.co.uk/cgi/news/release?id=143867
and what Dr Palmer recommends at liverdiseasedotcom.
No guarantees that the new meds will have less side effects. other articles as to why living with hcv can be more challenging than previously thought and how it is not in the liver:
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=173790
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11826420&dopt=Citation
Ultimately it is up to you to decide. So, good luck on that one.
Okay you heard from the right wing, now from the left :)
I am grade 1 stage 1 low VL geno 1A and have decided to wait for the protese inhibitors to come along...After much research and listening to the horrors of sides these people tell day after day, I think the ribavirin is the culprit in the most threatening of sx's...It induces anemia in 1/3 of it's victims...I honestly do not think the medical professional guru's know what the lasting effects of this drug can do and in my opionion would only enter my body if my fibrosis was at stage 2 or above...
But, that said, there is still those who do not have such severe sides...The question I asked myself, and you should too, is this: does the reward outweigh the risk? Well being 54 years old, a geno 1 that has no more than a 60% chance of SVR I opted the risk was too big...I will watch and wait and in the meantime do whatever necessary to make my body as healthy as I can...Herbs, vitamins, supplements, eating healthy, no alcohol and counseling on how to balance emotionally while living with a chronic disease...
Whatever you decide to do it has to be one you can deal with and commit to...Best of luck to you in whatever you do...
Beth
Okay you heard from the right wing, now from the left :)
I am grade 1 stage 1 low VL geno 1A and have decided to wait for the protese inhibitors to come along...After much research and listening to the horrors of sides these people tell day after day, I think the ribavirin is the culprit in the most threatening of sx's...It induces anemia in 1/3 of it's victims...I honestly do not think the medical professional guru's know what the lasting effects of this drug can do and in my opionion would only enter my body if my fibrosis was at stage 2 or above...
But, that said, there is still those who do not have such severe sides...The question I asked myself, and you should too, is this: does the reward outweigh the risk? Well being 54 years old, a geno 1 that has no more than a 60% chance of SVR I opted the risk was too big...I will watch and wait and in the meantime do whatever necessary to make my body as healthy as I can...Herbs, vitamins, supplements, eating healthy, no alcohol and counseling on how to balance emotionally while living with a chronic disease...
Whatever you decide to do it has to be one you can deal with and commit to...Best of luck to you in whatever you do...
Beth
*brain dead dip*
Few things you should consider:
- Current work situation, can you afford to take time off work if things do not go as smooth as you want
- Insurance, how much will your insurance cover the treatment.
- Your family situation, your treatment will affect people around you.
I do not know what kind of medical advances we will have in 5-10 years, but I heard that 3a genotype is one of the easiest to cure, so I would do it while you are young.
- Rus
However, given you're an easier to treat 3a, you might want to give the *controversial* short-course treatment a try.
Basically, you treat for 4 weeks and you're non-detectible, you then treat for another 8 and be done. The Italian study says you will have the same rate of success as with 24 weeks. The advantage is that you expose yourself to these drugs for a minimal amount of time.
If it turns out the virus is detectible at 4 weeks then you have a choice to continue for a total of 24 weeks or stop treatment. I would recommend the latter. That way you've limited your exposure to a total of only 4 weeks. And regardless of what you may hear, from what I've read, stopping tx early will not effect any future treatments in a negative way.
You'll find a link to the full-text Italian study in the thread above "12 versus 24 weeks...."
Anyway, if it were me, I'd do the short course or simply wait for better treatments down the road. But it's not me, it's you -- so I'd say take your time and continue doing your homework, and come up with a decision you're comfortable with.
-- Jim
For me age (57) and insurance (good) and family life (kids gone and a supportive husband) made this the time to treat. It will be nice to get that virus out of my system once and for all. Like Cuteus said, it is such a personal decision. For me, getting two sheets of paper and heading one, Reasons to Treat, and the other, Reasons not to Treat, was helpful.
Good luck in making your decision
friole
Here is the question: Doc suggested "Coley" study. Anybody know much about it? How long on tx with study? Are placabeos invonved? Cost?
He already gave the study nurse my man's name to get him in it. Gave us the number to call to enroll. It can pretty much be a sure thing if he wants it...his doc is one of the study docs for this. He not only is going to the Liver convention next month...he is a key speaker.
Any opinions? Would you do it? My man is just like the rest of you and just wants rid of this ****. I welcome any and all opinions on this.
Thanks
Tina-B
before the fibrosis had had reached stage 2. That could be why the little buggers managed to hide a few and survive. Also all
of the protease inhibitors that are in the wings are only to be used with interferon and rib. so that could mean that there will only be more sides with them than without. I would say kill em
while their numbers is small and get it over with...
And yes I am the sambone of old I think it has been about 4
years since i first started hangin out here. took the tx for 56
weeks and am 2 years post tx. I now am considering infergen.
http://www.coleypharma.com/coley/pr_1116293986
Whether you should even be in a trial now has a lot to do with how much liver damage you have and the specifics of the trial. I believe there's a full-disclosure legal document they have to provide you. Ask for it BEFORE you make the decision, don't wait for them to hand it to you when you pen you name.
If you can afford to wait a while, I'd contact the protease inhibitor trial people and see when they will be accepting geno 2's and 3's who have already re-treated. My guess a couple of years from now.
In any event, I'd do some indpendent study on this as opposed to just getting your treatment doctor's input. Sometimes they have incentives to promote this trial or that. My first hepatologist, who I still respect, suggested some trial to me, which on reflection would have been a big mistake. Like many physicians, he is torn between wanting to do good for the many (trial) and for the individual (individualized tx, often not in a trial.)
-- Jim
MJ
You are a two, I wish I was, two yrs ago.
You can't breathe in with your head in the sand...
So, I take it that you are now negative?? and you are type 1 and treated for 1 year?? If so, congrats. Were your side-effects really horrible??
MJ
YOU MUST HAVE HAD A BETTER POLICIE.
That's really not the point; it is what are these drugs really doing to your insides. Sure HCV does it's damage, but how severe and at what rate. Six months or a year or longer on these drugs could damage you alot more than HCV.
Rus makes some good points about some of the other ingredients needed to make your decision. And above all else your head has to be in the place. Good Luck
So--now I'm treating. Waiting for the results of my 12 week PCR. Better late then never and now I'm determined to beat these little varmints. I'm convinced that liver damage is not the only symptom of this disease and you have to factor that into your decision making process. Factors I considered:
I continue to work (and have to) but I have a 16 year workaholic history to fall back on in my workplace so I'm getting away with taking lots of coming in late/leaving early sick time. My workplace knows I am treating and my co-workers are very supportive.
Good insurance helps--at 54 I figured I needed to give myself a couple of opportunities to treat before I descended into Medicare twilight. My insurance ain't great--won't cover sensitive tests, wouldn't cover a 4 week PCR, but at least my meds are covered after a $30 co-pay per scrip.
My one kid is in college now (the reason I have to work) and I have an incredibly supportive and patient husband who was more then willing to go 48 weeks with me in this journey.
Even with what I consider to be remarkable support at home and at work, it's not always easy. I think if I were an easier to cure genotype though, I would strongly consider the short course treatment.
Good luck in whatever you decide!
Tracy
I also have an absolutely wonderful 30 year old daughter and 2 grandaughters, 10 and 4. I'm so proud of her and her husband. They've been together since they werer 14, both from very tough homelife's. They own they're own home and both went back to their inner city roots to work. He as a policeman and she works in the schools with socially troubled kids who just haven't been able(yet) to make in the normal classroom.
God Bless Chev, and thank you all who have cleared and come back to give us hope.
I don't want to cause bad feeling and paranoia in people who are about to start, are on it now or have treated, I only bring this up because I think it's a valid question to think about if you do have some "wiggle room." I happen to know people who have suffered some pretty bad things more from the treatment than anything else...whether treatment flared up something in their own particular systems that was lying dormant....or the treatment itself effected these things is anybody's guess, the docs don't know for sure...And I don't know that youre going to get a completely unbiased take on it from many of them, being they are the agents of the treatment themselves. This has to be factored in. I myself am leaning toward treatment, of course I'm praying for a miracle like anybody else, but I am closely monitoring myself with blood tests, etc and I'll be doing a fibroscan soon. My decision will be based on some things that are going to come up in this next year.
Of course if my system seems to be holding it's own co-existing with the virus...do I really want to risk the potentially bad things that could arise from the treatment itself? That's besides the side effects question. So many things to consider, but I do recommend keeping a really close eye in the meantime, and you might just decide to treat anyway.
Chev...I may take you up on your kind offer to email.
Sincerely,
Dana
It sounds like it is a good time for you to treat now and 24 weeks is not that long, after all, for what might be a lifetime of good health virus free. I would definitely get the biopsy - that will also help in the decision (my doc also said why but I insisted). We all worried about the sides before treating. Mine have not been as bad as my worries so far - I am on 15/48.
Note to Strator - your words are so beautiful, I'll bet your art is too. THank you for all your input here. I enjoy every word.
friole
Here is some articles connecting hcv to thyroid and other conditions, for those interested in what hcv is doing to the other guys within:
http://thyroid.about.com/b/a/097585.htm
http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/hep_c/news/2004/063004_b.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10468911&dopt=Abstract
those considering tx should add the test for antithyroid antibodies to their list of preliminary screening, along with cardiac and vision exams.
I did work the full time I was on tx, did not want to use sick days when I could do nothing but lie around in the house.The tx is not horrible, it is manageable, but it is very exhausting to feel like you have the flu day in and day out. Your shoulders slumped and you drag around, you want it to be over, but you want hcv gone more. It is WORTHY, and most of us don't seem to have long term effects, a few of the girls lost their thyroid function, but do not regret treating.
You already have a thyroid problem, it will have to be monitored carefully while on tx. My mom has thyroid problems so I thought for sure I would trigger something during tx, but nothing happened. Fear of the unknown can consume you but you can't let it stop you.
I didn't know if a year from now we'd have health coverage. We do now. And I didnt want (even w/o bx results) to keep getting worse. Bx is most important and has changed my life. Only 33, and thinking, that w/o tx....iI probably wouldn't make it to see my baby grad. Tx is well worth knowing that you are controlling it.....it is not controlling you anymore!
Sincerely,
Dana
Bingo.
Personally I go with Jimbo's diagnosis above but that is just me. I really wish I had known and had an option to get rid of this BEFORE I had stage 2 scarring.
And I am a 1a and a 1b so I've got it all around - but fighting to get rid of these cooties as best as I can! I want them GONE!
Good Luck
Over the hump (this one anyways) - waiting for the next one.
In fact I dare say I feel sort of "normal" almost. Wow.
I wish the doctors had been more careful about the anemia. THAT is the thing that really makes you almost quit I think. If they would be more proactive with the treatment for it I'd imagine so many people would have such less sx that a lot less would quit!
Also don't get hung up on the stage/grade of your liver for two reasons:
1) People with miminal liver damage and low viral load have an eaiser time clearing the virus (plus I heard they have an eaiser time with sides)
2) Since the early 90's I've been hearing that better treatments will be coming along. That hasn't happened yet. When I was first diagnosed the chance for genotype 1's clearing was 17%, now it's up to 50% (again those with low liver damage/viral load responding better to treatment). Why wait for your liver damage to progress only to find out that newer treatments once again favor low liver damage/viral load.
I think you will find the sides manageable. You can try treatment and if the sides become too unbearable you can always stop.
Hep C in LA (genotype 1B, week # 8 of treatment)
I'm 43, male, asimptomatic and diagnosed with HEP C + in april 05. All my blood counts are OK but the ALT is 85 and AST is 39. I still don't know my geno nor the viral load. I'm waiting for the results. My social security judgemental doc does not consider a biopsy neccesary at the moment and no tx as of yet (I have had 2 ecographies and in both I showed no portal hypertension, spleen & other gastric organs normal but a mild fatty liver). Don't drink and don't smoke, but I'm experiencing a mild pain in my lower right chest. But I went to a younger doc that seems pretty much into treatment (in fact he's and advisor for Pegasys in Spain) so that makes me wonder. I'm trying to get a Fibroscan but overhere is difficult to get an appointment because there's only one in madrid.
Can anyone give me some advice? These 2 doctors are contradicting each other and I don't want to lose my job but I don' want to waste valuable time either before jumping into tx.
I have read that fibrosis /cirrosis is asimptomatic? am I mistaken??
Tnx and God bless you all
saludos
Best of luck to you
Beth
Interesting the yardsticks we choose, isn't it. Seeing my boy through 'till he's ready to use his own wings is my No. 1 priority. Who knows how far along that timeline I'll make it? Through elementary, middle school, college, marriage, kids? Take each day as a gift, I guess.
"Since the early 90's I've been hearing that better treatments will be coming along. That hasn't happened yet."
I belive SVR odds are up about seven-fold since that time (6 mo non-peg interferon mono therapy). I'd rather take one pill and call in the morning - but until that's an option I'll take what we have now over 15 years ago.
hope today is a good day for you! now that I know I am stage 1 I am obsessed with the progression and when I got this bug...Logic tells me I have not had it for 37 years...
Question: you being a 3..prior to tx did you have liver pain, muscles and joint aches, fatigue, high alt/ast? how long do you think you have had this?
*dip on a quest*
I had some mimld liver pain for maybe the last year - probably wouldn't have thought much of it had I been niave to my condition. All blood work was normal until the last year when WBC and platelets started declining a bit. Glucose has read high on occaision.
A little low on energy for a few years, but losing 30 pounds helped that a lot. I think if I could lose 10 years (and possibly gain an inch or so here or there, as long as we're building a wish list :)), I'd be good to go.
I had FOUR transfusions last year and every time I tell a doctor this must be where I got it I get the SERIOUS eyeballs.
Then I tell them well h3ll I was quite a coke wh0re when I was a in my 20s that must be it. Shuts them right up.
;-)
I dont really but I want to!
HepCinLA -- you too - sound much much better. Still doing okay running around after the little ones? Hard to believe you are on #8 already.
Scubadiver - Welcome to the forum. I am not sure what some of those tests are that they are running in Spain, but it sure it taking a long time just to get genotyped and your viral load. I would lean towards the younger doctor. THe older one sounds like he doesn't even want to learn about Hepatitis C. There is a lot of stigma attached to Hep C in the States too. Many of us do not disclose our condition to others. You will find all kinds of good information on this forum - many people treating and many waiting. Good luck to you
friole