This forum is for questions about medical issues and research aspects of
Hepatitis C such as, questions about being newly diagnosed, questions about current treatments, information and participation in discussions about research studies and clinical trials related to Hepatitis. If you would like to communicate with other people who have been touched by Hepatitis, please visit our new
Hepatitis Social/Living with Hepatitis forum
I was a superresponder at 4 weeks (3log) then cleared only somewhere between 12 and 24. As a GENO 1A and a GENO 1B I would think maybe I should.
BUT I do not WANT TO. I WANT to be over on August 18th.
NyGirl: If you were told your chances of succeeding would be DOUBLED, by doing the extension, I think I can guess what you would choose to do. I know it is really a pain to have to reconsider the duration of your therapy (I hated the thought of extending as well), but the prospect of being back at square one, and having to do tx all over again, is not a scenario that I think you will want to entertain. If you have to re-treat, due to relapse, it will most likely be an extended tx as well.
Best wishes to you.
DoubleDose
I haven't decided. I might do a PCR at 40 and see where that stands. I'm just not sure I can physically handle another 40 weeks of this stuff.
It's almost like I Just don't care anymore at that point and could monitor and wait for the new drugs someday. I am not sure.
NY girl...I got hime to prescrive a AD. He gave me Celexa. I am tired of hiding and crying. I hope it works.
My spirits aren't really that low - just when I think about doing 39 MORE weeks yuck... I mean I can do the 15 I have left standing on my head...it's the concept of another 39 weeks from now sounds too GROSS. I just can't imagine being this tired for THAT long you know what i Mean?
I just talked to my shrink about it at lunchtime and he said good advice - get the second opinion and stop projecting he might not want you to it because of all the physical problems you already have from treatment and you wont OR he will think it will help you tremendously and then you will be happy to!
He's right. I think it's this limbo not knowing what is going to happen or what I will do that is making me NUTS
But...I went down and got a giant bowl of frozen yogurt and sprinkles at lunchtime (yup I eat healthy here at work) so I am feeling better already! :)
BEAGLE
You also really want to do everything in your power to avoid the 'relapse situation'. Nothing feels worse. If you are going to suffer, do it for a great outcome. Of course there are no guarantees, but the odds are much better by extending.
DoubleDose
===================
As usual they're several ways to interpret this study in terms of treatment strategies -- with extending to 72 weeks for slow responders being just one.
Even with 72 week treatment duration, those detectible at week 12 only show a 30% chance of SVR -- assuming they're non-detectible at week 24.
This then begs the question whether or not treatment is worth continuing if detectible at week 12, and if the benefits of extending treatment to 72 weeks outweigh the statistical rewards. I would think this becomes a very individual decision with the amount liver damage, as well as other issues playing an important part in the ultimate treatment decision.
Another thought, as mentioned, is how does the 800mg dosing affect the study data? Does it lower SVR rates for 48 weeks in the slower responders equally, not equally, or not at all?
A recent and similar discussion here:
http://www.medhelp.org/forums/Hepatitis/messages/40813.html
-- Jim
I wish there was something I could do to lift your spirts. YOu have always helped me.
That's a really great link and probably deserves it's own thread if any are open. DD and others have been talking about this for some time and hopefully many of us will participate in the survey.
NY,
Sorry treatment is crashing in on you. Just remember that how you feel today is not how you will feel tomorrow. I hit a low around week 40 but did bounce back a little afterwards. The decision to extend -- and how long -- doesn't have to be made until the last minute. In the meantime, seeing another doc for more input is a good idea and if nothing else probably will keep the anxiety level down as is so often the case when you take action.
== Jim
It's discouraging that current tx decisions cannot benefit from more recent data (the basic Berg data was available in '03 and the riba dosage is an indication of its age). However this is still very valuable data, both because of the longer tx time and the higher sensitivity VL tests (many older studies did not look below 600).
I believe Jim has summarized it very well. The gains over 48 weeks for 'slow' responders are impressive, but 30% still looks like a long run. There is good reason to believe that both the 17% and 30% would both be boosted by modern riba dosing, but of course it's hard to guess by how much. If you're feeling lucky or if you are at stage 3 or above this is very encouraging news. For others however, I don't believe it provides clear guidance.I was at 2 when I started tx and have relapsed after 48 but would be reluctant to go longer. Clearing the effects of tx took me well over a year and, as I've mentioned before, the sense of having aged five years in one remains. Given the age of this data it's likely that more recent extented tx data will be released at one of the forthcoming liver meetings, hopefully in time for those currently on tx.
-- Jim
NY - I understand fully girl, I don't want to extend either. The problem with the study (for me) is that the sensitivity used for the study was <50IU/mL. With my 40 IU/mL at 12 weeks, I was already under the radar for this study. Not too many doctors would give me much sympathy about extending, I think. You need to weight all the negative factors for extending, but flatlining like you did for 8 weeks is a pretty negative thing. I did send you the study.
Does this help? Maybe a little bit. It confirms the common sense observation that lowering the bar just a bit, from 2 to 1.94, and thus allowing more to make the cut, didn't produce a huge increase in the number of NSVRs among those who didn't make the cut. Thus it supports taking these cutoffs with a bit of salt, all based on 239 geno 1s who did intf/riba (not peg).
The other point they make is that the negative predictive value, NPV,of not getting either a 2 log drop or VL < 1000 at week 8 is very close to that at week 12 (97.1 vs 97.2). The flip side of the extended tx studies are those that allows patients to reliably determine early on when tx isn't working. The above study is sketchy because it relied on ifn, but, for those starting out, it would be worth looking at week 8 NPVs estimates of peg-based data.
1. I may just commit into extension a month at a time.
2. By the end of these 48 weeks I may actually be better at managing tx. (Of course my family might not be)
3. I want my energy back but wonder how upset I'd be if I stopped at 48, and the sx effects took another 24 to 48wks to wear off, and I might as well have been on the meds.
4. If I'm not clear at 36 wks it may be another ballgame.
5. Dream scenario...I'd like to take a break after 48, work more and get a little $$ stability, so I don't have to push through constant work and would have the option of upping dosage and maybe missing some work.
6. If I stop too soon to wait for another time or med I may risk losing the insurance I have or not being able to afford it.
7. All the increased percentages in the world are still not a guarantee.
8. Can I get a other bx towards the end of 48 to see if anyhings changed.
9. I'm a different person than I was 3years ago, and a different person than I was 8mos ago. Might have to let whoever I am 8mos from now decide.
Thanks for posting, Any thoughts on this situation always welcome.
My heart goes out to all who don't have the options I do, and to all who face finding their way through all the gray areas to make their own decisions.
Don
LOL popping a few extra for my weight is probably what lead to the anemia hahahahaha
merlino, I too am a single mom, and had a desk job for the duration of tx. My supervisor knew I was treating, she was the only supervisor who knew. I did not miss many full days of work, maybe one or two. I found that staying home made me feel worse.
You can play it by ear.
Just today I thought I should go back on the meds, just so I can loose a couple of pounds while eating like a pig.
a fleeting thought.
Ready to think of reasons NOT to tx yet?
One item that is discussed here every once in a while is how hcv affects the way we feel from day to day, if we blame normal day- to-day woes and ills to hcv. Early on, I decided that for me HCV is not always the answer to my question why do I feel lousy? But, hcv gets a bunch of the blame.