This forum is for questions about medical issues and research aspects of
Hepatitis C such as, questions about being newly diagnosed, questions about current treatments, information and participation in discussions about research studies and clinical trials related to Hepatitis. If you would like to communicate with other people who have been touched by Hepatitis, please visit our new
Hepatitis Social/Living with Hepatitis forum
Where did you read that?
My original bloodwork tested for HCV Antibodies. When it came back positive, my doctor(s) ran more sensitive blood tests ( I don't know the names) to confirm the results.
The original test read HCV Ab 43.4 High, compared to the normal S/CO ratio of 0-.9 .
But there was a footnote that said samples with high s/co ratios (greater than 9.9) confirm positive (95%), but less than 5 out of 100 might represent false positive.
All the subsequent tests my doctor ordered confirmed the positive for HCV Ab diagnosis.
Unfortunately for me, I wasn't among the less than 5% with false readings.
Good luck.
-- Jim
is really negative. This happens more often in persons who have a low
risk for the disease for which they are being tested. For example, false
positive anti-HCV tests happen more often in persons such as blood
donors who are at low risk for hepatitis C. Therefore, it is important to
confirm a positive anti-HCV test with a supplemental test as most false
positive anti-HCV tests are reported as negative on supplemental
testing.
That means he had a clue.
You are reading too much into this test.
I won't pretend to understand everything about this test but it is NOT measuring the actual virus but what the body usually produces if it encounters the virus. The actual virus test is 10X more expensive and is usually done if the antibody test is positive.
What is your point? Do you want researchers to devote more time to come up with a 100% accurate antibody test instead of working in more helpful areas?
-- Jim
My understanding of antibody tests is that some other virus', old flu's etc, may produce similiar antibodies like HepC. This is why there is a threshold limit of .9 to be positive.
I have a friend who 50% tests positive on HIV antibody tests but always negative on HIV RNA PCR tests. That is because he has some conditions such as excema etc, and he someone naturally has similiar antibodies from HIV exposure. In HIV you have to test positive for maybe 5 out of 8 antibodies. I don't know exactly what it is for HCV but it may be 3 out of 4.
------------------
LOL. Yes, it appears you're correct, thanks for the heads up. Didn't he post this before? I think I mentioned a false negative that time then but somehow missed it this time.
Anyway, so what he appears to be worrying about then is a "false negative" which as the report says would only be a factor if he had a recent infection and therefore the antibodies didn't have time to form yet.
His best bet is to have a viral load test and be done with the entire issue. I think we both suggested that in a follow-up thread.
Be well,
-- Jim