Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
 | 

Would a liver biopsy be advisable?

by SammyQ2, Nov 18, 2007 05:55AM
   Greetings.

I am a 57 year old male with a little paunch.  (6'1", 205 lbs.).

Almost nine years ago I discovered that I had Hep C.  I successfully underwent interferon/ribivirin treament (pre peg-intrferon).  Since then, I have been tested annually and my enzymes are just fine.  I also had the RNA by PCR test done for about the first years after treatment and was found to be virus free.  I don't have that test re-done anymore because of the expense.

Prior to the treatment I had a liver biposy done.  The score was:
Chronic Hepatitis, HCV
Moderate activity, grade 3
Bridging fibrosis with nodularity, stage 3.

I can provide the microscopic description, if you would like.

Since all this time has passed and I do enjoy a daily glass of wine, or two, I was thinking about having another liver biopsy done.  I would like to know if my liver has gotten better, worse, or is the same.

Would this be advisable?

Thanks,

Sammy
Member Comments (7)

by copyman, Nov 18, 2007 06:33AM
To: SammyQ2
this is a question for a good hepatologist. me personally, i would get a liver biopsy every 5 years and PCR just for the first 2 years. not sure if i would drink alcohol "every" day if i was stage 3. please let us know what the doc says or if you get a biopsy what the results are, this could help alot of us here that want to know about the liver healing itself after being "cured". best of luck

by FlGuy, Nov 18, 2007 07:06AM
To: Sam
I hope to be in your situation some day, having been hcv-free for several years.  I understand your curiosity to find out what condition you liver is in.  But, if you had the biopsy, and whether it was stage 1 or stage 4, what actions would it drive for you?  The bx is an invasive procedure and not without risk.  Instead I'd see a hepatoogist, as Copy suggests, as have the necessary blood tests to determine all the other valuse that are indicative of liver condition.  Then, if a bx is warranted, I'd think about it.  Curiosity in not a medical reason.  Or, take the opportunity to consider non-invasive assessments like Fibroscan

by desrt, Nov 18, 2007 08:09AM
To: SammyQ2
I've been undetected almost five years and just got my second sonogram during that time. The first, at one year post-tx showed steatosis (I was geno 3) and I'm curious to see if anything has changed. I have no plans for any more biopsys, unless my gastro feels it's needed, but I only had mild fibrosis going in.

by cat33, Nov 19, 2007 04:00AM
To: SammyQ2
Sorry but I feel differently . I had 2 biopsys within a week and a half. The first one was done wrong . They got a lymp node and part of my colon. The second one got some liver. I am at end stage no symptoms. MELD score of 10. and have been for my eveluation at one of the best clinics around. Even though I am at end stage I was told I would still start at bottom of list. So if there's any doubt in your mind get started now. I'd have another biopsy any day If I thought anything had changed.  cat33  " drinking is mind over matter and it doesn't matter to me" And even though I never drank much. When they mentioned Hepatitis a year ago that came to a screeaching halt. I remember being in the hospital as a child in incubation for over a month with hep.A and I couldn't even begain to immagine that again. Although life is very grim these days. cat33

by jmjm530, Nov 19, 2007 07:43AM
To: Sammy
I was also around stage 3 when I treated. Now SVR for 1.5 years and no plans to have a biopsy, nor was I advised to have one. As FLGuy suggested, unless your doc finds something to suggest having a biopsy, why have an unecessary invasive procedure? Fibroscan is one alternative if you really have to know. So far I "don't have to know" so have passed on Fibroscan as well. Periodic follow-ups with a good liver specialist would be my advice for post treatment.

-- Jim

by mremeet, Nov 19, 2007 09:54AM
To: sammyq
If I were in your shoes I'd get the biopsy. You did have stage 3 which is pre-cirrhosis, you are a bit older and so the healing process that usually occurs after ridding yourself of HCV occurs a bit slower than in younger people, and of course as you mentioned you do drink alcohol regularly (although the amount you mentioned doesn't really sound excessive, unless you were being "euphemistic" in describing your alcohol consumption). But daily, consistent consumption of alcohol, even if a relatively small amount with a stage 3 liver would cause me to want to see how I'm doing in terms of fibrosis reversal - considering what's at stake, a reality check is in order. Fibrosis is supposed to wane and at least partially reverse after successful eradication of the HCV virus. But it doesn't always happen with everyone who SVR's, some seem to hold their pattern at whatever level of damage they had when they successfully treated. And since regular alcohol consumption is in play, the possibility of fatty liver is also in the picture (i.e. not just fibrosis). It would be advisable to find out if you happened to be one of these non-regressive fibrosis and/or fatty liver people. And if you did turn out to be one of those people, if I were you I wouldn't drink a drop of alcohol ever again. Speaking for myself, I recently wrapped up my treatment 6 months ago with an F1 liver. I plan on having a fibroscan in a few years to see what's happening with my liver too. I drink beer on a regular basis and I just want to make sure that the amount I drink isn't doing more damage than I think it is. The only way to really know that is to take a peek at the liver after some time as an SVR who still imbibes from time to time.

Lastly, just out of curiosity's sake, dontcha just wanna *know* if your liver has gotten better since being cured?? After all I've been through in the last 24 years (since being infected) with the side effects of HCV, the liver damage, the awful treatment, and then the final victory in the end (SVR)...I'd just like to see definitive proof that my liver truly has healed after knocking the virus out for good.

by nygirl7, Nov 19, 2007 11:44AM
I would have my liver enzymes monitored on a pretty regular basis, hopefully that would give you some insight into a sudden raise and fibrosis.  Stage 3 can't be treated like even stage 2...pre-cirhhosis is a scary place to be.  I certainly think there is nothing wrong with getting a biopsy, I'd love to get one and I'm only 10 months post..I want to see where my own liver is going after 72 weeks of treatment.

Related discussions
Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
Recent Activity
Marte313 Well, that wasn't like anything I expected =/ One down. t...
Proactive uploaded new photos
1 hr ago
Proactive joined this community
Welcome them!
2 hrs ago
starshine1ca is starting week 46.
snadge is 4 weeks post TX and feeling much better
Marcia2202 going back to sleep
cutter5 joined this community
Welcome them!
10 hrs ago
jelise is a thrid of the way through tx!
RSS Expert Activity
Prevention Gains Momentum: Your Gui... 
Nov 29 by Lee Kirksey, MD
What You Don't Know About Breathing...
Nov 24 by Steven Y Park, MD
Thanksgiving
Nov 23 by Thomas Dock, Vet. Technician
Community Members