Cuelworld, I had mentioned this in a post when I first started tx and got the same response because of other things going on on the forum. The correlation between the med injections and the Riba associated curves with the sx experienced run in parallel, kind of like the controllers here at mh. If you think outside the box here you will hit a dead end. Just the way it is.
Be Well
Jasper
at least you tacitly agree that infergen is 'stronger' and used for tougher cases.
yet no hard evidence exists to support this somewhat accepted theory. like wise
my doctor seemed to think pegintron was 'stronger' or 'better" than pegasys and likewise no evidence exists to prove this either. this is just his personal belief and it influenced mine. i do personally believe that pegasys offers the least
varying blood concentration levels and because of this alone i beleive it has the
lesser svr rate, of the 3. again, no real evidence, studies have never been done that can prove or disprove this. pulsing, overdosing and induction have been proven in medicine and this is my whole argument for the hierarchy of effectiveness. like most everything we discuss, much of it may be disproved in the future but i wanted to throw it out there as i have never seen this argument presented before (its probably in the archives, but if it is i couldnt find it). i hope your challenge and this response helped others to get a better picture. i did make an overt effort to preface everthing with "my belief" and will try even harder in the future.
i wish it were all this simple. but as we know tx is very complex. i would think that by now with all studies if one brand or type of interferon eas better than another, it would have shown up in a study. infergen is concensus interferon so it's stronger. but if it was so effective, why not prescribe it in the 1st place, harsher sx?
also, i have another way at looking at the issue of interferon half life. the longer it stays in your system the more sustained the attack on the virus. i'm just offering a counterpoint. i know in all the literature says they don't even know how or why the stuff works!
as for me i'm on pegasys/riba. i'm a 1a, 50 old m, 200 lbs starting vl 3 mil. i cleared between 12 and 15 weeks. good luck to you, with whatever you do!
I could not get my redipen to work on week 50 and had no more redipens left and it was the weekend, so I stuck a diabetic syringe into the end of the redipen (the powder and the sterile water had already successfully mixed together) and drew all I could see from the redipen. Talk about bad sides. I felt horrible for about four days; usually I only feel really horrible for two days after dosing the peg.
I found out a few days later that that the 150 mcg redipen actually contains 202 mcg of interferon. By drawing the peg out with a syringe, I probably wound up getting about a 200 mcg dose. No way I would ever take extra peg again, especially since I am doing 72 weeks.
Be careful taking extra. There are people who advocate the practice on this board of taking way more than the prescribed interferon dose who also complain of horrible lingering after effects of tx.
The more I hear the less I know.
Ron
pegasys - ... less side effects. works fine on easy cases
pegintron - ...harder sx, better results with tough cases
Based on????
'but it is hard to argue against the logic and practical outcomes.' Which practical outcomes?
120mg (.5ml) in the redipen pre made one use syringes. i havent checked the weight tables but at 160 lbs im probably on the border for the next size up.
i dont plan on upsizing but borderline weight groups should look at both dosages.
on the INF blood concentration levels do you see any merit at all in my thinking?
The only point of view that I have is that using PegIntron I relapsed. Using Pegasys, I've been und since week 2. But, the reason was/is not necessarily the effectivness of the interferons. And, no tacit agreement on Infergen, I have no experience there.
what an interesting event for you. youre definately a "mcgyver" with syringes. at least you might get a benefit from the one high dose. not that you need it on your
intense regime.
im sorry, i obviously didnt make myself clear. im not promoting higher doses at all, just the fact that i believe that right after your normal shot, you temporarily have a higher concentration in your blood with different NFs. as the week goes on the concentration subsides and sx become less. just an idea that may have no real meaning in
HCV treatment. the responses here suggest little interest in the concept.
this answers my question, does any one believe or agree with this? not really.
thanks for your input.
Hey, man.
I am finally gettin your drift. I still worrie a bit about someone taking you as a Doctor or med. researcher, But I am following your ideas . I can see using some of your stratagy towards end. See my post re; my biop results when you can, it tells my war plan. When talking with my G.I. N.P. I mentioned some of the new Ideas of a strong attack (i call it ) She did not know of these new ideas but she feels it good looking into. I mentioned the Arm of the clinical test that is trying new stratagies as well .She will be trying to look in to this as well.
As for me I will be blending all together here when I start the battle in 5-6 months .
Hey !!! who kidnapped the real cruell? You an Abbas getting tight or what LOL !
Hope you feeling the best possible .
Mahalo's & Aloha,
R.