Aa
A
A
Close
Avatar universal
poker lessons
before Trin's hasty departure(s) she wisely pointed out that I'm on tx and not making  sense so  take the following with a grain of salt. If anyone can show me where I'm making a  mistake I'll be grateful - so far   it looks to me as if Merck should be taking poker lessons from Vertex's Bob Kaufman.

First there's the issue of how he convinced the street tela response among naives was 79% when vertex's own data indicates at least 5% less, but never mind that.

An  unanswered question that's been rattling around here for a while is what happened to the 118 pts in ILLUMINATE who did not make the eRVR cutoff (und at w4 and w12). When miked  asked for questions before the  ambassador intro I suggested that one  but apparently discussion never reached analysis of the trial data. l. However now that the 147 page Vertex submission is available on the fda site:
http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/AntiviralDrugsAdvisoryCommittee/ucm252559.htm
we should finally  have an answer.

ILLUMINATE is now labeled Study 111 in the FDA docs. A description of the study, its  design etc. starts on page 69. The 118 pts who did not make eRVR were assigned to 12+48 and labeled "eRVR-". There was no control arm hence no control SVR stats. Figure 17 tells us the overall ILLUMINATE SVR rate was 74%, confirmed in the FDA review, and then goes on to justify why 24 is not inferior to 48 among the eRVRs.

However, it seems that at no point is the SVR statistic for the eRVR- subgroup ever given. Tables 18 and 19 tell us many details about them (genotype, fibrosis, race, etc.) but never answer the main question.

The FDA review includes the statement :"Of the 40% of subjects not achieving eRVR and assigned to receive T12/PR48, about 64% achieved SVR." but there doesn't seem to be any source for that statement in the Vertex submission. Anyone see it?
Cancel
8 Answers
Page 1 of 1
1491755 tn?1333204962
Thanks for the post. I guess the bottom line is Tela is more effective than SOC.  It does scare me when people call it a "cure".
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Submit Comment
1491755 tn?1333204962
Wow page 74 sure has some interesting stats.  We sure our much better off with Tela !
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Submit Comment
419309 tn?1326506891
Table 19 gives the SVR rates of all four groups.  

If you look carefully, the 2nd column of numbers under the 12+48 "eRVR-" shows that 8 out of 10 low VL were SVR; 70 of the 108 high VL were SVR (65%).  Total SVR from that group of 118 was 78 (66%).  Maybe the FDA is just lousy at math...?
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Submit Comment
1491755 tn?1333204962
What's wrong with the math ?
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Submit Comment
1491755 tn?1333204962
398/540=73.7%

Hasn't that always been the claim ?
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Submit Comment
419309 tn?1326506891
My calculations were 65 and 66 percent, but the willing's post stated FDA stated 'about 64%.'
Hey, what's 1% between drug companies, right? ;)
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Submit Comment
Avatar universal
many thanks for spotting that -  Trin was obviously right.  Table 19, on page 74,  gives the answer. Hidden in plain view - Vertex must have been thinking we'd all enjoy an  Easter egg hunt!

That 66%is likely to be important  to many (about 40%) of naives starting triple tx : you get to w4 and are not und: do you push on? After 8 more weeks of  selecting PI-resistant virions if you don't make SVR chances are you'll have a high proportion of them .

The FDA review did say, 'about 64%' so they're still right. Actually for all the grousing about incompetent government that review,  IMO, was a great example of effective   government service.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Submit Comment
Avatar universal
yes, an  overall 74% SVR rate for ILLUMINATE has been reported all along. However what Vertex never reported, and appears to have made less than glaringly obvious here, is what happened to the eRVR- subset - those who didn't go und by w4 and stay und at w12 (not a small group) among them, 78 of 118,  66%,  got SVR.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Submit Comment
Your Answer
Avatar universal
Answer
Know how to answer? Tap here to leave your answer...
Answer
Submit Answer
A
A
Recent Activity
1420486 tn?1384796753
Blank
blondie717 joined this community
Welcome them!
2 hrs ago
517872 tn?1465669131
Blank
senseanonymous  commented on photo
4 hrs ago
707563 tn?1455827280
Blank
Emily_MHModerator Survey link - https://goo.g... Comment
Jun 26
Blank
Weight Tracker
Track your weight over time
Start Tracking Now
Top Hepatitis Answerers
1815939 tn?1377995399
Blank
317787 tn?1465993311
Blank
DC
163305 tn?1333672171
Blank
Rural Mural, CA
446474 tn?1446351282
Blank
San Francisco, CA
Avatar universal
Blank
683231 tn?1438659664
Blank
Auburn, WA
Hepatitis C Community Resources
RSS Expert Activity
233488 tn?1310696703
Blank
Marathon Running Done Over Many Yea...
05/15 by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS, FAAOBlank
233488 tn?1310696703
Blank
New Article on Multifocal IOL vs &q...
05/15 by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS, FAAOBlank
748543 tn?1463449675
Blank
TMJ/TMJ The Connection Between Teet...
01/15 by Hamidreza Nassery , DMD, FICOI, FAGD, FICCMOBlank
Top Hepatitis Answerers
1815939 tn?1377995399
Blank
317787 tn?1465993311
Blank
DC
163305 tn?1333672171
Blank
Rural Mural, CA
446474 tn?1446351282
Blank
San Francisco, CA
Avatar universal
Blank
683231 tn?1438659664
Blank
Auburn, WA