This forum is for questions about medical issues and research aspects of
Hepatitis C such as, questions about being newly diagnosed, questions about current treatments, information and participation in discussions about research studies and clinical trials related to Hepatitis. If you would like to communicate with other people who have been touched by Hepatitis, please visit our new
Hepatitis Social/Living with Hepatitis forum
It is possible but not common. The real risks for hcv transmission is blood transfusion before 1992 and Ivdu.
Sexual transmission is more likely male to female than female to male.
With heterosexuals, the female 'receives' and the male 'sends' the body fluids so the receptive partner is at higher risk.
With homosexuals, anal sex is the riskiest activity possible for transmission of Hiv and the riskiest sexual activity for transmission of Hcv. Again, the receptive partner is at higher risk because he receives the body fluids from the other partner.
Hcv is a blood borne illness which needs infected blood to come in contact with uninfected blood to transmit. That is why blood transfusion and Ivdu (intravenous drug use) are the two easiest ways to transmit Hcv.
Most sexual activity does NOT involve blood except for rough anal sex and sex with trauma etc.
Would you mind telling me what your risk was? I have a feeling you are a female who had sex with a male whose hcv status you do not know? i will help you any way I can. I am not judging you at all. lord knows, i am not perfect.
If your risk was sexual, Hiv and Hbv are much more likely than Hcv.
Hcv is not considered a Std as Hiv and Hbv are.
If he is neg, then that is a HUGE plus for you. If he is pos, then you are still 'probably' ok but you definitely need to be tested if your partner is pos.
You can call request a test at 1-888-732-2348 and ask for a 'peace of mind' package. Before that, though, assess your risk,(Be honest with yourself about what you did). If you want to share it with me, i will be glad to tell you what i think you shoould do.
Jakied - With homosexuals, anal sex is the riskiest activity possible for transmission of Hiv and the riskiest sexual activity for transmission of Hcv. Again, the receptive partner is at higher risk because he receives the body fluids from the other partner
Both of these statements are not backed up by a lot in the way of facts. HCV is NOT transmissible through body fluids other than blood.
Sexual transmission only occurs when there is blood to blood contact. Or more precisely blood coming into contact with an entry point into your bloodstream.
The higher rates of sexual transmission from male to female is caused by females being more likely to inject their partner first when sharing a needle.
The clusters of homosexual sexual transmission are caused by drug use.
From http://www.hepatitisaustralia.com/about_hepatitis/relationships.html
Hepatitis C is not classified as a sexually transmissible infection (STI).
Hepatitis C is transmitted through blood-to-blood contact (where the blood of one person passes into the bloodstream of another). In rare cases where hepatitis C may be passed on during sexual contact, it is likely to be through blood-to-blood contact.
http://www.hepatitisaustralia.com/about_hepatitis/women.html
Menstrual fluid contains blood and other body fluids. As hepatitis C is transmitted by blood-to blood contact, there is in theory the possibility of transmitting hepatitis C through contact during menstruation. However, the risk of heterosexual or female-to-female sexual transmission is extremely low and there is no evidence that sex during menstruation increases risk of sexual transmission. In theory, having sex while menstruating can increase the risk of transmitting hepatitis C if your sexual partner has any open cuts, wounds or abrasions.
You only have a slightly lower chance of catching HepC thru sex as you have of being hit by lightning.
CS
You are certainly more knowledgable than I. I was only relaying the info.
I dont think we will ever have a conclusive answer as any study that could uncover low level transmission rates would need to be quite large.
Anyway work out what makes sense to you.
CS
WHAT sex??? :{
LL
interpret this series of Hcv tests for me :
1) screening test : reactive with a 1.0 score.
2) riba supplemental test : neg
3) Pcr qualitative test : neg
Is this result 1) a neg for antibody and virus with no prior exposure or
2) neg for virus but antibody pos.
just curious.
Hope all is well with you. Are you surviving on treatment?
The only one that I would care about is that the PCR the came back neg.
Apart from Health Depts who cares if you are anti-body pos if you are PCR neg.
CS
As for your bf, I agree with Jakied, you should tell him. While i dont believe their is any obligation to tell anyone your hcv status, its not much of a way to have a relationship, if it begins with a secret. Put yourself in his shoes. how would you like it if it was the other way around. If he ups and runs it wasnt going to be much of a relationship anyway.
Cause if the PCR test is neg tell him anyway.
CS
good luck and have fun!!!! : O )
The combination of 'weak reactive' and neg Riba means neg for antibody and the screening test was false pos. The neg pcr test, probably qualitative, means no virus.
Your combination of 'weak reactive screening'/neg riba/neg pcr means no antibody/no virus.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you already new the answer why ask?
CS
-- Jim
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The only problem i have with the above is that if this were the case then wouldnt you expect higher rates HCV+ in the male homosexual community.
This isnt the case or if it is higher then not by much, at least not in Australia.
This is just going to go round in circles. I still believe that most cases of sexual transmission is caused by not admitting to past drug use. Which is not the same as saying it doesnt happen. It just doesnt happen very often.
CS
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JID/journal/issues/v196n2/37991/37991.web.pdf
http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/2006icr/croi/docs/022406_a.html
http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/hep_c/news/2005/ad/071305a.html
Results: 824 men consented to HCV testing, and the prevalence was 0.85% (95% CI 0.34-1.74). HCV seropositivity was strongly associated with a history of IDU (OR=60.43, 95% CI
6.70-544.79). All HCV-seropositive individuals reported a history of either IDU or other means by which they may have had parenteral exposure to HCV. There was no evidence of an
independent association between sexual behaviour and HCV infection.
Seven men (0.85%) tested positive for HCV antibodies. (Interestingly, 37 men claimed to be HCV antibody positive when interviewed, but only six actually were.) Age, socio-economic status, longer duration of anal sex, HBV infection, a reported history of gonorrhea and previous injecting drug use were significantly associated with HCV seropositivity. IDU was a risk factor for six HCV AB+ individuals, and the seventh reported ear piercing and tattooing as possible exposures.
7 out of 825 now that one hell of a risk factor.
Lets not get into a study war, we both no that we can find studies supporting both side.
The fact that we can even have this debate after 20+ years of well documented HCV history says volumes about the sexual transmissiveness of HCV.
CS
CS
-- Jim
Jakied - Yeh i'll agree its possible but only under very specific conditions such as the ones Jim mentioned. And then only if there is blood and nicks/cuts on the partner.
I dont believe that its more prevalent male to female.
CS
CS