This forum is for hepatitis patients, family members, loved ones, friends or anyone with an interest in hepatitis, to have open social conversations about any topic they choose, with the exception of religion and politics. Please note that our standard “Rules for Posting in Public Areas”, which are found in our
Terms of Use , also apply in this community.
If you are newly diagnosed with Hepatitis or you have questions or information to share about current treatments, research studies, clinical trials, or other medical issues pertaining to Hepatitis, please post it in one of our Hepatitis Communities (
Hep A ,
Hep B ,
Hep C or
Hep-autoimmune ).
Asasinated at age 54.
ironic that the USA is one of the only so-called progressive western nations that still hasn't elected a woman.
Not to mention that Pakistan now has 100 'rogue' nukes that can easily end up in you-know-who's hands.
Sorry if i shouldn't have posted this here but aside from the sheer tragedy of it, I just think everyone better pay attention coz it's gonna be a bumpy ride.
We're not getting the snow here! Hooray for small gifts.
Thanks, beamish,
wyntre
the story sure is weird. How could she have been shot in the head and chest at close range while riding in an armoured car by a suicide bomber who had, evidently, not detonated his bombs until after shooting her . . . . I saw the footage of her standing up through the open sunroof, but I thought the shooting occurred after she sat down again.
- and the forensic evidence has already been washed away.
Jam,
That's ridiculous for your indian friend to have said 'good riddance.' Is that what you think, too?
I also have lots of indian acquiantances/friends and i can't imagine any of them being 'glad' that Bhutto was assassinated, especially since India borders pakistan.
I suppose that the same might be reported by Euripeans or Asians if one of their American friends were to say 'Good riddance' at our president, or a current presidential candidate's assassination.
Are you taking the view of one supposed 'friend' in india as a barometer for others reactions?
As far as having blood on your hands, name one 'world' leader who doesn't.
wyn
Another thing is, Tarik really thinks that her death probably saved lives. I do not think that him saying good riddance is necessarily inappropriate considering the crimes that he thinks that she committed and the crimes that he thinks she would have committed.
I personally do not feel like I know enough to voice my opinion on the subject. I can tell you that I am scared, I am really scared of the future. The world does not seem to have learned any of it's lessons from the past, and World War 3 sounds less science fiction everyday.
I wouldn't want to see my worst enemy assassinated, and I certainly think she did a lot for a lot of people, especially women, or at least gave them some hope.
nobody's perfect, especially politicians, but she is an important symbol of the 21st century and an icon in having become the first muslim woman voted in as a head of state.
If you know anything about what Muslim women go through, I would think that having another woman in power would tend to improve their lives significantly.
As the day has gone on, I've gotten a handle on the sequence of events and it now seems that she, inexplicably, invited the attack because she raised her head above the sunroof of the only partially armored vehicle and exposed herself to the assassin's bullet.
But it's still a terrible tragedy, IMO. And the events that could be triggered by the tragedy are even scarier.
BTW - i used to work in a 'little india on the hudson' school district.
And i don't get all my news from the US media. I do lots of google searches, checking blogs, other countries media, etc.
wyn
pakistan,the middle east and the world....
When it comes to news from that part of the world, I take all the english speaking media with a big fat grain of salt.
That being said, you are probably right that this was a tragedy for democracy and bodes ill for women of the region.
oh, yeah. .......
What with the "Kitchen" accidents, FGM and other Pakistani human and gender rights atrocities, what kind of message doya think it sends to Pakistani women when someone as powerful and connected as BB is assassinated on camera??????
think there's a message there?
wyn
She had requested additional security and protection after the Bhutto-mobile catastrophe but the Pakistani's refused to provide additional assistance. That's why she wrote the letter, a kind of 'to-be-opened-in-the-case-of-my-death' doc.
I saw a security pro's analysis of the moments before her death and while of course she should not have emerged from the sun roof to address the crowd, it was also glaringly apparent in the video that there was no one protecting her.
I may not agree with everything she did in her life, but IMHO, she was one heroic lady. She didn't HAVE to go back to Pakistan. It's not like she needed the money. it took real courage and, as r glass would say, GONADS, for her to set foot back in that country. She knew she was a marked woman but I don't think she expected musharraf to so blatently hang her out to dry. Can you imagine any American politician exposing themselves to the danger she knew she faced?
She's a hero, especially compared to most of the media portrayed hollywood glamor-girl types this country is so addicted to holding up as role models.
And, predictably, she couldn't be allowed to survive. If this were a game of chess, i'd say Bin Laden was way ahead. What better way to throw Pakistan into turmoil without REALLY evoking the wrath of its (male) citizens then to orchestrate the return of Bhutto and then take HER out? Accomplishes the same thing, chaos, without the taliban and al quaeda having to enrage their possible converts.
Who knows where the path leads? (Ok - I admit I'm hypothesizing but you just don't know - and that's the point - keeping us ignorant as a means to preserving power.)
OK. Now you better respond so I don't get shunned, now. *LOL*
wyn
Thank you for putting your thoughts down so articulately!
It's great to see someone expressing exactly how I feel when I am in no place mentally right now to try to express it myself... :-)
OMG, lady! that comment has almost convinced me i CAN do another 17 weeks (for total of 72) of this poison!
you just made my month! I'm thrilled I was even the slightest bit comprehensible. :)
BB,
Agree with almost everything you said. Off for shot 55. Will write more, later.
BTW - there's an excellent documentary on right now about Pakistan; ch. 57.
SFBaygirl,
"Where else are we Brian fogged people supposed to talk about politics???? "
Hahahahaha. my sentiments, exactly.
Why have we spent 10 billion dollars firming up Musaref to protect the world from terrorists. He has done NOTHING to help save the world from terrorists. Bhutto promised to do so, no one else has. She shouldn't have put herself out there as she did to be killed. Apparently she has money and has the rep of it, so why didn't she hire her own protection? Almost think she planned on dying. I know that's an awful thing to say. She was so well educated and could have led Pakistan into a true social democracy. Her father's exectution made her strong and firm in the belief to make Pakistan a democracy. But why the hell did she stick her head out of that car? It doesn't make sense! Damn it. I hate this. We needed a middle east woman to lead pakistan, or a man that believed in democracy. Now what are they going to do? Destroy the country? Musheif is a wimp and will do nothing to help with terrorism, just as Bush prefers to spend our money in Iraq, instead of going after the real terrorist who blew up the towers.
Yesterday, during our work lunch break I started talking about her and the implications of her assassination on not only to the people of Pakistan but us also. In a room of 9 well educated women there was only one other person in that room that even knew who she was. One girl said she had heard her name before but didn't know who she was......
Extremely frustrating that these are voters and they have no idea whats going on in the world.
OK....I feel better....
I'm educating myself more about that area and from what I've gleaned, Musharareff and the Pakistanis support both the Taliban and Al Qeada,surreptiously, of course.
The Bush Administration is desperate for an insider (Bhutto) to report back on Mushareff's antics. Another reason she has to be killed.
Ironic, isn't it, that Condoleeza Rice recruited her. Bhutto was sacrificed.
'a better question is why after spending trillions of dollars,thousands of american lives and millions of middle eastern civilians lives we still have not brought bin laden&cohorts to justice?.'
Strategy, IMHO . . . . they don't want him caught. the Pakistanis love Bin Laden. And the US , again, IMHO, have reasons to NOT want to catch him - just look at how al quaeda fell of the political map after 911 and suddenly iraq became the target . . . . Deliberately looking the other way , , , , a shell game . . . .
.'.why,while supporting resistance to soviet occupation in afghanistan did we train&arm fundamentalist ?..'
Think there's a thread here? SOMEONE has plans for alqueda. I'm not gonna post links to certain stuff here but feel free to contact me thru medhelp and I'll send what I've got,
'thank god american medical practice is not run like american foreign policy-if so we would all be bankrupt,dead&certainly not winning any popularity contests.'
well said, beamish.
wyn
''Musharref IS a terrorist or, at the very least, a Muslim FUNDAMENTALIST. The Pakistani people have great affectiona and sympathy for the Taliban.'
Bhutto promised to do so, no one else has. She shouldn't have put herself out there as she did to be killed. Apparently she has money and has the rep of it, so why didn't she hire her own protection?'
"
just don't think it was as simple as that. Obstacles must have been placed ihn her way. Where was condy then? After getting bhutto into it you'd think she help bail herout, but no . . . "
Almost think she planned on dying. I know that's an awful thing to say.
'Not that she planned it but felt it couldn't be avoided.'
She was so well educated and could have led Pakistan into a true social democracy. Her father's exectution made her strong and firm in the belief to make Pakistan a democracy. But why the hell did she stick her head out of that car? It doesn't make sense!
I't's a politician thing'.
Damn it. I hate this. We needed a middle east woman to lead pakistan, or a man that believed in democracy. Now what are they going to do? Destroy the country? Musheif is a wimp and will do nothing to help with terrorism, just as Bush prefers to spend our money in Iraq, instead of going after the real terrorist who blew up the towers.
'rant on!'
''
But, boy, was this woman ever asking for it. I just don't get that whole martyr thing. She could be shopping at Harrods RIGHT NOW. But nooooo....
What have you ever done in your entire life that would have lifted a candle to what she at least TRIED to do?
So, from your comments, I deduce that it's ok for a "mother Theresaish" woman to take a vow of poverty and help people that way (which she later accused herself of being a hyporcite about in her memoir as her faith was often forced) but if a young(er) stronger educated woman enjoys occasional shopping jaunts in ADDITION to having an interest in humanatarian causes, like the plight of women in Pakistan, that's impermissable according to your world view.
Oh, and BTW, I though you were against 'political
threads? I distinclty remember, when i first started loggin on here and the whole forum split was occurring, that you were particularly vocal and demanding in your idea that politics shouldn't be addressed.
So why jump on to this thread?
wyntre
Honestly, I'm pretty much un-offendable, so by nature, I presume people are pretty much like me.
And yes, I was against political threads and I still am against political threads because it's my opinion, especially considering the elections coming up, that it would rip apart the cohesiveness of the board causing resentments and/or all out flame wars. The problem being, as soon as someone pipes up with their political views, then you're open to someone elses, who may not like your view, or you theirs. Suddenly, when you seek support for your TREATMENT and illness, human nature being what it is, that resentment could carry over to that because you said something that 'offended' someone. ( As if having a different view is offensive, but apparently .....it is. ) But, having not posted any political threads that doesn't preclude me from throwing a barb here and there when they show up. There are hundreds of political forums all over the www, all with the same threads and same old tired arguements. I've never felt like it had a place here. I go to political boards to discuss politics, sports forums to discuss sports, and cross-dressing forums to ....no wait....what I meant to say was I go to motocross forums. Honest. MOTOcross.
Now as to your comment of: " What have you ever done in your entire life that would have lifted a candle to what she at least TRIED to do? "
I once drank 11 pints of stout without taking a pisss. I think that qualifies.
Hope your treatment is going well wyntre. Hang in there. Stay positive. You can do it.
B) This didn't start as a political thread; simply a reflection of a breaking news story about a courageous and much-admired woman who inspired people around the world.
C) Maybe you should finally '**** Out' that 11 pints of stout. You might have become water'logged.
D) That last comment was a joke.
E) What's wrong with vocabulary games? (from pigeons post). you got something against scrabble, or crossword puzzles, or suduko or something? I mean, if you're gonna do them anyway, what's the harm of sending food to someone else in the process?
F) thanks for your kind words. I'm trying to hang in there. Week 55 of 72 and the living ain't easy.
G) This is as high as i can go these days without having to go back to A and start all over from the beginning. Somehow, I don't think you would find THAT amusing.
wyn
Let's all calm down take a deep breath and remember we are here for one another!
Linda
Scotty
Mother nature is a cruel MF'er, wyntre. Maybe we should send them Ribaviron so they're too tired to pro-create. My point was, why don't they just send the rice ? It appears they are holding back a meal simply because some doofus misspelled a word. I can picture little Butu asking where supper is and being told..." NO RICE FOR YOU. WYNTRE SPELLED CALENDAR WITH AN 'E'. "
Uh-oh....now I just slammed anorexics...AND mother nature. And people named Butu. Oh the humanity !! Where will it all end ?
And I personally learn a lot from them, as living where I do, I don't have a lot of truck with conservatives....a few but not many....unless it's through the media, etc...so it's interesting, to me at least, what people from all over the US think about some of these issues...
This side of the forum was specifically made for people to talk about ANYTHING they want to talk about, hepatitis, or some other thing...I haven't seen any rules posted saying we are restricted in our posts as to what the subject matter should be about...on this side anyway...
Personally, I don't think what I-horn said was funny...sure he won't lose a lot of sleep over that, or that he's royally impressed by a lot of my posts..that's okay...you'll never see total harmony in any group of people, impossible, too many personality types. (Unless they are brainwashed Moonies or something, but there are not too many Kool-Aid drinkers here I take it...)
I do feel that in having hepatitis C, I share this scary, burdensome disease with all the people here who have it....and that *can* transcend a lot of this other nitpicky stuff...for most people here anyway.....the ones that can't get over these things, things that I might of posted that they found offensive..... don't need to help or interact with me, and that's fine too.
There are plenty of people who post here, and I really think that when it comes my turn to treat, etc...that I'll get lots of help here, from whomever...whether they *agree* with me politically - or not...and then there is the old saw we've heard more times then Bayer has pills...if any member has problems with the subject matter of any particular thread, there are plenty of other threads going at the same time, that might be more to their liking.
I've seen some of the nastiest, most disagreeable people here get help...there are many understanding, empathetic people here, one of the reasons I like this place.
Oh! So THAT'S your problem? Too much riba in the system and now the 11 pints of stout can't get to your head?
Oh, BTW, that was a joke.
TTTT, the anorexic comment was amusing. Even the mother nature pass. And i have found lots of your commentary very funny. i just think someone's sudden death is not a cause for celebration unless you're volunteering to go over to pakistan, dig her up and give her an old-fashioned irish wake.
Ok - I said what I wanted, you said what you wanted and i have no further issues with this unless you wanna go a couple of more rounds.
I will admit that I will be less impulsive next time I hear something on the news that hits me in the gut. thanks for bringing that to my attention.
wyntre
BTW - did you mean Colander - that thing you strain spaghetti in?
My view is what it is. If you want to discuss politics, go to a political forum where there are people truely interested in that and get challenged. Around here, no one is going to get really nasty so in that regard you're protected by the generally empathetic nature of this place and people wanting to be supportive of one another, get along, and not offend anyone so in that respect, I think political discussion in this place, is somewhat bogus and lightweight since that's not it's primary purpose. You may feel really brilliant hitting that 'post comment' button with a fine piece on what is wrong with the world and 'look at how smrt i am, but don't count on it. By it's nature, this board isn't occupied by a bunch of teenagers that know jack shiit about the world.
For me, about the last thing I want to do to pass my time is get into a long winded political debate with an overly sensitive interferon crazed hepper in full blown obsessive complusive mode with a hint of ribarage and a holier than thou attitude.
To quote Massachusettes Rep. Barney Frank, who I generally despise, when asked about the sad state of politicians in America responded, 'Well the voting public is no bargain either.' Ain't that the truth. All of course, except 'you'. You being 'everyone'. No one ever thinks they are the problem. So when it comes to longwinded posts about politics my question to you, or anyone else for that matter, is...and just who are you ? Who are you, oh wise one, that is enlightening me to the ways of this world ? And the answer is....just some chick...or dude. Ding ding ding.....what did I win ?
-boozer
And no, I dont' have riba rage. I'm 5 months post treatment. Cruising along, doing pretty well except for a few non-health related 'life issues' to deal with. Life goes on.
I have no problem with your post(s). I think you're under the impression I'm critisizing you. I'm not. So you didn't like the BB remarks. I think I'll live. As will you.
Keep up the good work and keep poppin' those pills and doing those shots. You're gonna make it.
I didn't particularly get a lot out of some of the TV posts here in weeks past, Dancing with The Stars or whatever...but I never expressed it too much, cause that's not my deal, its theres...and if people get some joy, or amusement talking about this on the community side, I'm glad for them, and I sincerely mean that, no irony intended.....I don't get a lot from those shows...But I'm glad if anyone here gets amused, or interested, by anything...as long as no one is hurt in the process...I feel shared interests are an excellent way to take our minds off the strum and drang of hepatitis...I just mostly avoided those threads and went to others that held more interest for me. You can do as you please though, and if complaining about the political threads here is of interest to you, that's fine too. I'm glad you know so many intelligent people in your sphere, I know a few also.
What an excellent, thoughtful post, especially this part:
"but her involvement in politics as a charismatic figure, a woman and, in a country that is overwhelmingly Muslim would have been a shot in the arm for womens rights worldwide."
not that I'm in any way a 1-gender interest person but I've read quite a bit about gender-dominated societies and I know i wouldn't last long under such a regime.
What i want to know is who is REALLY behind Musharref in this instance? But I certainly won't post any such thread, here. Would love your take on it, though.
I'm also concerned about this:
'But, what Musharraf might not have thought about is Bhutto herself might be given martyrdom status and this could led to utter chaos in Pakistan and might very well spill over to neighboring countries.'
4c,
Didn't you know that all the intelligent people in the world are strictly FOH?
'Having spent a good 10 years on the old Canadian National Post forums with a group of some pretty heavy hitters...writers, journalists, and a few politicians that were about as informed of a group as you'll find with no tolerance for fools...."
Doya think he's referring to us? *LOL*
wyn
You're right, I can always ignore political threads.
I especially do not like the personal attacks on each other. We do need to get along. Yes, there are political boards we can post on, but as friends mostly, as we spend a lot of time with each other, can't we agree to disagree without putting each other down?
So, to me at least, it's really not that serious, personal stuff just gets in the way sometimes and believe it or not...I'm not into personal arguments or flaming...I'd rather discuss points and points of view....
I don't even remember my post you're alluding to in a alcohol thread, specifically...only that I always find it odd that people would come on here and talk about over drinking alcohol...I just figure, you want to over drink with hepatitis and get pie eyed, or on treatment, whatever....go do it by all means, our lives are to be lived the way we please....just why talk about it at a hepatitis board? Where people have this disease?.... just don't see the point or how it serves any purpose....I'm NOT including moderate drinking in that equation either....if that's what you're referring to...but I'm sure there are people who don't understand everything I do here either...
What her motivation is for coming back to Pakistan now isn't entirely clear. I think she came back now because she's certain to have the backing of the governments of the free world and part of her deal is to be absolved of the corruption charges that have been laid against her in the past. Having said that, it was STILL a gutsy move and not at all without great personal sacrifice, I'm sure. And it is a blow to the democratic process to have Bhutto killed/assassinated at this time. Certainly the pro-Islamist forces had something to do with this. And that is the REAL threat here. Whoever gets into power in Pakistan has to be able to contain the rising threat of fundamentalist Islamic factions that are increasing in power in the north of Pakistan and allowing the passage of pro-Taliban back and forth across the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan, thus prolonging the hostilities there. I don't profess to understand all the politics over there, however, I watch the delicate balance swaying this way and that way with varying levels of concern, knowing the greater implications for the rest of the world.
I admire Bhutto's bravery, I'll say that much. She could have stayed in exile and played it safe with all her money...as l-horn said, she could have been shopping at Harrod's. Instead, she chose to come back to Pakistan. That takes guts, knowing you could be murdered. Not so sure I admire how she conducted herself once there. She had a responsibility to the people of Pakistan to keep herself safe and protected.
While Musharraf is clearly looking to protect his own power base, one has to wonder if Bhutto would have been able to contain the Islamist threat in that country as effectively as Musharraf, not that he has done so effectively...just that I'm not quite sure who would have been able to do so MORE effectively. And I'm concerned that Bhutto would only have been able to do so if the West had backed her militarily. Now we'll never know. And now the world waits to see what will happen with the upcoming elections.
I hadn't heard she supported the Taliban. Interesting. I think or at least her motivations were to support democracy. It took guts to go back to Pakistan. I haven't read that much about her and am learning here.... Where did you get your info on her supporting the Taliban?
4C; Nice post
Linda
I think Bhutto was in favour of democracy as well and I think that her time in exile did her outlook some good. Just the same, we're talking about Pakistan. Musharraf has had to play both ends against the middle and he pretends to the U.S. that he's giving them what they want while at the same time, he brokers deals with militants in his own country to keep things from spiralling out of control there too. I think he HAS to do that sometimes and so he dances to various tunes including that of his own personal ambitions and the tune of billions of dollars being poured into the country if he does the West's dance. Bhutto has done and might have continued to do the same..and might have NEEDED to do the same. I was really watching with some skepticism of the whole process because what the West demands isn't necessarily how things should be. We apply this one-size-fits-all democracy .. and some countries have some cleaning up to do before they get there.
The responsibility was that of the Pakistani government, which REFUSED to offer assistance. That's how she was almost assassinated 2 months ago. That's why she emailed a Washington friend pointing the finger at Mussharef as being responsible for her death, if it occurred, becasue he was deliberately withholding protection.
I certainly was not intending to convey the idea I am 'elevating' Bhutto to sainthood. I Personally, I don't believe in saints or sainthood, just flawed, tragic, sometimes heroic humans..
And as far as her exposing herself to danger, that's what REAL people do: She HAD taken on the role; one of the unwritten laws of successful politicians is access to the people. I think of the best politicians as consumate performers.
So let's grieve the noble lady's death and admit that it was a tragedy, especially as it's replayed day in, day out, on TV sets all over the world, for everyone to see, including her family, her children, her supporters, her relatives. That makes the whole thing even more poignant.
wyn
Wyn; Yes, I agree that we should be sad and I know it was a tragedy for her to die as she did. I would like to know who really is responsible.
IMHO, the reason 'we're' not on the afghan border is coz some people are making a ton of money.
.
Who is making a ton of money off of not being at the border? I heard today, actually from Huckabee, that we had a target on Bin Laden and it was called off getting him. What's up with that?
I don't research this stuff frequently but if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck it's probably a duck. (IMHO)
BTW, I'm not conviced money was given to M to 'fight' 'terrorism,'. that's just another catch phrase, another marketing ploy, another all too mindless easily disseminated slogan.
money was given to him, but why? And 15 billion is the amount the US spends in iraq weekly.
i just don't believe anyone, Linda. I'm cynical that way. that's why i never would have started a strictly political thread. The Bhutto assassination just struck a deep chord in me; reminded me of the JFK and RFK footage.
wyn
Follow the oil, sounds about right. Have you seen Charlie Wilson's War? Great flick. I never read the news from local or popular sources, always went elsewhere to get my info. Haven't had the energy to do so these days. Thanks for the links and any more you can give me will be great!
Linda
wyn
Main Menu
Latest headlines
so you can bypass ALL the junk! Like I said, ya gotta sift through it.
wyn
I know you love your outdoors and so do I. No neighbors, just nature. I do have theaters close enough, but my home in the mountains doesn't. We are small in this world and as someone said about gathering as a group. Don't think that will happen in this issue, but at least for the issue of Hep C, we are together.
Rent that movie! Send me more links.
Thinking of you sweet one!
Linda
wyn
From the first video on breaking news, to today, 5 days after the tragedy, my gut instinct is still;
COVER-UP! COVER-UP!
I will continue to follow and research this, linda, and i will email you anything else i find out and hope you will do the same for me.
wyn
Sure does sound like a cover up to me. Why would they come out with some phony report? They should have said nothing. Makes them sound guilty as hell.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/12/29/benazir-bhutto-assassinat_n_78385.html
I think the trail is gonna lead right back to this country.
There have been 4 conflicting explanations given so far by the Pakistani government. the latest, about the sun-roof 'latch', is so ridiculous it's almost funny.
wyn
Linda
http://comment.independent.co.uk/commentators/article3295851.ece
HNY,
Wyntre
Are you referring to posters on this thread?
Do you live in the region, yourself?
What makes you think that people with a so-called 'connection to the region' don't have an agenda?
not that I ['m referring to dointime's article. I just skimmed it and the basic premise seems to be it's odd to have a 19-year-old inherit the mantle to the PPP. I agree. I also think the same thing happens here, all the time. And I don't agree with that, either.
You seem to have fixated on the idea that since I expressed sorrow for the passing of
a historically significant person, that somehow blinds me to the shortcomings of that person.
I suppose you're the only one who can see the truth?
wyntre
' I am more interested in the take of people with a connection to the region who have some understanding of the history and current climate of Pakistan's politics'
Are you referring to posters on this thread?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First of all, unequivocally no. I'm not referring to ANY posters on this thread when I said I was more interested in the take of people with a connection to Pakistan and it's politics. I was referring to journalists, commentators and anyone writing articles on this situation. I feel that, while there are those Western writers who can write intelligent and incisive pieces, the pieces that interest me MOST are those who have a personal stake in the process, i.e. they still do or used to live there and deeply care about it from a very personal perspective. The writer of the article dointime posted says his heart bleeds for Pakistan. That is pretty much how I feel. I don't bleed for any of their leaders so much, although I do feel Bhutto's death was tragic. I bleed most for the people of Pakistan through all this, as they are the biggest casualties here. I never really believed in the motives of ANY of the leaders of the political parties in the Pakistan election. I feel they all had ulterior motives of some kind and that none were completely noble in their intent. That seems to be the nature of Pakistan politics up until now and I don't think having the backing of the West is the magic cure for that and might actually be the poison pill instead.
Do you live in the region, yourself?
----------------------------------------------------------
No. I don't live in the region. I don't see what that has to do with anything as nobody else here commenting does either. I live in the hinterland known as Canada. That's precisely why I am particularly interested in the comments of those who either live there, used to live there or have some sort of deeper connection than I do. I have long been interested in global politics because I feel that what happens in the world has impact on everybody else in the world to varying degrees and to ignore what's going on in other parts of the world, we do so at our peril. That's just me.
What makes you think that people with a so-called 'connection to the region' don't have an agenda?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I never suggested they don't have an agenda. I simply said their insights interest me more. In my mind, everybody has an agenda, Wyn. Everybody has their own bias. So that's why I like to read from a variety of sources and I consider the source, their particular bias and their level of credibility. I try and take my OWN bias into account as well, as I certainly have one, as do you. I try to remain objective and open-minded as my MAIN goal is to learn and educate myself and be aware. However, I do approach things from a certain ideological perspective, as do we all. To try and balance this, I read from various news sources that are both liberal and conservative and inbetween. There are two main publications in Canada, one purportedly Conservative and the other Liberal. So I make myself read them both. I read online political discussions (and yes, participate in them) and learn much more from reading these and the insights of various people than I do from the articles themselves alot of the time. My goal, as cheesy as it sounds, is enlightenment.
I liked the article dointime posted because it presented a meaty amount of information and perspectives that seemed more objective than a number of the articles I've been reading. It seemed to be written more from the perspective of how this impacts the people of Pakistan as a whole rather than from a particular biased ideology and I learned a great deal from it. That is why I liked reading it.
You seem to have fixated on the idea that since I expressed sorrow for the passing of
a historically significant person, that somehow blinds me to the shortcomings of that person.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not "fixated" on that. I simply wanted to present an alternate perspective on Bhutto and some food for thought. I am not as sold on her as others and it seems you took my comments as disrespect. Perhaps those comments were out of place in retrospect in this particular thread and would have been better suited to another type of discussion on Pakistan politics in general. You started this as a tribute almost to Bhutto it seems, and so I went quiet, not being able to join in the chorus to the degree that you and others were and not wanting to cause further acrimony.
I suppose you're the only one who can see the truth?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm going to try not to let that comment **** me off too much. The truth is a kaleidoscope, Wyn. If you turn it one way, it looks like the truth is pink. If you turn it another way, you'd swear it was blue. To me, you have to turn it all around and get the full spectrum to get closer to the actual truth. Therefore, I enjoy discussing things with people so that I see colours from another perspective and learn more. I may not like some of what I see or hear but it's absolutely essential that I entertain other points of view. Some people will fight to the death to defend their particular colour of the truth to the exclusion and disregard of all others and that is what we have going on in the world today. If you don't like the particular colour of my contribution to the prism, I can't help that. I may not like yours either...but I'm still interested in hearing it and I will take it into account and consider it.
I sincerely respect your desire to understand this issue, Wyn, and I mean you no disrespect. Your starting this thread has pushed me to read up on this more than I might have and I've quite appreciated what you've started here. I apologize for any offense to you, Wyn. None was intended.
Trish
I too am here for enlightenment and enjoy your take on this issue. Whether we like what we hear or not, we are getting lots of different views.
Linda
I agree it's good to hear ALL perspectives and it's also good not to ASSUME that any of us get our info from only one source.
I also agree much of the national news reporting is heavily biased, either to one side or the other.
wyn
http://www.ft.com/indepth/pakistan
dt.
I'm gonna bookmark that site.
I lost the article you posted yesterday, too. I thought I'd saved it but nooooo . . . and it wasn't valid today.
I did skim through it and the gist of it seemed to be a discussion of the 'dynasty' factor.
Ironically, there have been only 2 families in charge of the white house for the past 16 years.
thanks DT and HNY. :)
wyn
www.bbc.co.uk
Happy reading.
I really enjoyed your thoughtful response to my somewhat snipish post.
I do apologize to you. Sometimes the riba rage takes over as I'm posting. Yes, i did start the thread, (mistakenly - I'll never do it again) from a gut reaction within minutes of hearing the breaking news and seeing the video footage of the assassination. It was written not from a political stance but from witnessing, live on streaming video, the tragedy of the human condition, which is my main interest.
And perhaps I was also responding to that sinking-in-the-pit-of-the-stomach-sensation.
I think I owe you a public apology.
Sorry.
Wyntre
I look forward to more discussions. Don't stop posting what you want to, Wyn. It's like a box of chocolates though...you never know what you're gonna get. :) (I think Forrest Gump's mama said that...)
Take care, Wyn.
Trish
wyn