This forum is an un-mediated, patient-to-patient forum for questions and support regarding herpes issues such as: Herpes symptoms and treatments, causes, diagnosis, and herpes in men, tests, telling your spouse or partner.
My test results were .89 for HSV II. I have not had any visible outbreaks, but I have had a positive partner. The last time we had any sexual activity was probably about 4 months ago, and last time we had intercourse was at least 6 months ago.
Can you explain why the results are not 0.0? I could not find an answer. Is it possible that the anti-bodies have not built up enough to make the result positive, or would it just automatically be higher than 1.1?
I am only curious since the result is so close to the equivocal range of .90-1.1.
Is it worth re-testing or is .89 definitely negative? Could the Herpes Zoster virus antibodies cause the .89?
If the last time you've had intercourse with anyone was that long ago, you should forego any more IgG testing and just get the Western Blot. It's well worth the cost. For me it cost $50 to become a patient at Westover Heights and my insurance covered the rest.
Did you know he was + when you were having sex? Did you use protection? Do you have HSV1? This can slow antibodies but not normally so much that you wouldn't have converted by now. You didn't take any valtrex or lysine by chance did you? It seems like this is probably just a blip - no one is ever 0.0 on the antibody tests.
Yes we used protection and had knowledge of it. I have only taken Valtex for a shingles infection like 2 or 3 years ago, so I'm guessing that doesn't factor in. And my concern was just if I didn't have symptoms and could possibly be infected, more peace of mind for myself. I'd like to know if I was infected or not.
My doctor doesn't seem willing to do the Western Blot test.
My Western Blot came back within 5 days of drawing blood. Also they have a staff there that answers a ton of herpes questions daily and are more knowledgable then 75% of the doctors I have seen regarding herpes.
I trust this result. I suggest everyone do the same.
Thank you Fleetwood20, I just looked at the results with this explanation in mind and that makes a ton of sense. I should have realized that with every other test listed above that one in that column was the acceptable/normal results range.
This should be a lesson to people like me who over think things and ignore the obvious.
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.