You're most welcome.
Terri
Terri:
Your assessment regarding the IgM appears to be right. I retested 14 weeks post sexual encounter, though this time IgG only, and came up negative. I have had 3 negative IgG tests (though the first one was only 4-5 weeks out), one equivocal IgM and one IgM positive at 1.2 on the index. Given that 14 weeks had passed, no symptoms occurred, and the IgG is still negative at 14 weeks (I have a normally functioning immune system), that really corroborates your statement about the IgM being fairly useless and often mentally harmful. Thank you for all you do help shine a light on a subject about which many of us are scared and in the dark.
I can't say what is going on with your body, but I can tell you that the IgM is not a good test, and it has many false positives, in my experience. I can't tell you that it is wrong every time, because it isn't, but it often is.
You will have to wait 4 months from the exposure for an accurate IgG test to know for sure if you do or don't have HSV 2.
Terri
Can you shed some light on my last question, please? My mind is really unsettled.
Thank you, Terri.
I currently feel a lot of pain and tenderness in my inguinal glands and in my lower back. My temperature seems to fluctuate also. I have mild but very isolated pain in individual areas of my legs.
I have not had any outbreaks, and have checked myself thoroughly. Not a single lesion. Additionally, none o the women I slept with has reported any outbreaks to me. ( I've not had sex nor any form of sexual contact since becoming concerned about my status.)
What do you make of the tender and painful inguinal glands and lower back? There feels like there is pressure between my belly button and penis too. This is what gives me such concern about the IgM being correct.
Are you saying there is something akin to a possibility aim still negative for HSV? Please help me make sense of what is going on in my body,
Controversy is putting it mildly. In my experience the IgM test is completely useless and very often wrong. I can't make anything of these results, and neither should you. The difference between the two numbers is meaningless as both are compared to a control value which will vary from run to run.
Hunter Handsfield is correct - it is too soon to test with any accuracy. By three weeks from the experience that puts someone at risk, 50% will be positive, by 6 weeks, about 70%. You've got some time to wait and that will be difficult, but rely ONLY on the IgG test, and ignore the IgM test.
Terri