No, it is not true. Taking acyclovir daily reduces transmission by about half. This comes from a valacyclovir study, but we have no reason to believe that acyclovir is any different, when taken as directed. I would say your physician needs a herpes update, perhaps!
Terri
You can trust me. This is my specialty. It is certainly good to await your swab test results. If it is positive for herpes, then you have herpes. There is no such thing as being "exposed" to herpes and being not infected. However, your antibody test at 1.49 is what we call a low positive value. Anything index value between 1.1 and 3.5 is a low positive, and should be confirmed with another type of test. There are some false positives in this group of test values. The closer the index value is to 1.1, the more likely it is to be a false positive. So you need another test, and the one you need is called a herpes western blot. It will be easiest to do through Quest laboratory. The test code is 34534. If you want back up for going to your doctor with this request, you can go to www.ashastd.org and order a herpes test toolkit to take with you. Low positives are discussed in there, and it would be a good gift for your doctor to better understand herpes testing. Or you could just try asking if he would order it on your behalf. It will take a new blood draw. There are six states in the US that will not allow the test to be sent out of state (it is done only at the University of Washington). Let me know how you do with this, OK?
Terri
That's very good news.
Terri
My lesion culture came back negative.
Yes, the acyclovir could interfere with your antibody test. I would suggest that you consider stopping the acyclovir. If you get a rash that is swabbable, go back in and have it swabbed for herpes. If not, wait 4 months from a possible infection and retest using IgG
Terri
That's very good to know. I started a daily suppressive regiment about a week ago of 800mg per day. Is there any reason to believe that if I stay on this regiment that the acyclovir would affect in any way the outcome of a blood test in a few months?
This doctor also told me that the Acyclovir was not very effective in repression of the virus or of aiding to prevent transmission. Is this true?