I think testing would be in order for the protection of any future partners, not so much for your concerns. If a person has acquired genital hsv it most certainly could be passed during sex.
Dr Hansfield stated to me that if he were in my shoes he would not get tested which I interpreted as it is very unlikely I was infected after dating a woman for several months and receiving oral sex from her on many occasions before know she was hsv-1 positive. I assumed oral sex was safe sex. I didn't know it was possible to acquire hsv-1 this way. My relationship with her ended almost 15 weeks ago. I never noticed any symptoms and believe me, I've been checking.
No, using the word assuming is not correct when approaching issues of herpes. Only testing would confirm this. The term strong evidence to me means extremely low risk. The doctors did not say it was no risk.
Just so I'm clear. I believe they were implying that if the receiver of oral sex did not notice blisters or lesions within 2 weeks of an encounter with someone that's hsv-1 positive then they should assume they did not get infected. Is that how you interpret it?
that why i say extremely low risk
I've read where both Dr Hook and Dr Hansfield both state with quite a bit of confidence that the absence of overt genital symptoms like blisters and lesions within the first 2 weeks is strong evidence hsv-1 was not acquired from such an event.
Hi, theres very little research on hsv1 oral to genital contraction. Its only recently been discovered possible. But in general, acquiring herpes from a one time encounter with no sores present is extremey low risk.