Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
 | 

Please Clarify results regarding HSV tests

by 69sally25, Jun 11, 2009 01:25AM
Tags: hsv test
If someone has a positive IGg and IGm result for HSV I and a positive IGg result (1.7)but negative IGm result for HSV II does this mean they are infected with the virus?  There is no previous signs of an outbreak nor anything associated with herpes, the blood test is the first inkling to this problem. Is the virus in their body? Can they pass it on to new sexual partners? Please help

sall
Member Comments (9)

by waringblender, Jun 11, 2009 03:05AM
Not necessarily
Not necessarily
Only if they are infected

by 69sally25, Jun 11, 2009 11:13AM
HI thanks for your reply..how would i really know that they are infected then?

by waringblender, Jun 11, 2009 11:23AM
You won't unless they get a test 3-4 months after screwing you.

by gracefromHHP, Jun 11, 2009 05:45PM
A hsv2 igg of 1.7 is a low positive and needs confirmation that it's a true positive.  If it really is a true positive then yes you can transmit the virus.

grace

by 69sally25, Jun 12, 2009 12:10PM
hi thanks everyone

to waringblender: he got the test 4 months after "screwing me" and I dont have any issues so does that mean he is not infected?

to gracefromHHP: should i get him to get tested again with just the IGg or also the IGm to see if its a true positive? how long should he wait between testing?

by waringblender, Jun 12, 2009 12:21PM
I don't even understand what your last post means. What are your "issues?"

Don't bother with IgM testing. It's recommended all over this forum and the doctor side not to get this test. Why are people still throwing this out as a test they need?

by 69sally25, Jun 12, 2009 12:28PM
to waringblender: hi sorry with regards to issues I mean I have never had anything to show that i may have contracted herpes (no sores, etc..) and he has never had them either and we have been together for six months. If he hadnt had the tests done showing that he has hsv 1 positive and IGg Hsv II 1.7, we would have never known that he had been exposed to herpes. I just want to understand is this in his body and can he pass this on to me? does exposed mean infected? thank you again

by petal130, Jun 12, 2009 01:50PM
To: 69sally25
Please take heed to grace's earlier response to you:

"A hsv2 igg of 1.7 is a low positive and needs confirmation that it's a true positive.  If it really is a true positive then yes you can transmit the virus."

No, being "exposed" does NOT mean "infected".

by gracefromHHP, Jun 12, 2009 02:39PM
Have you been tested too to know your own status?

Your bf needs to confirm his status with further testing. A herpes WB or a biokit hsv2 igg test would both be good to chose from.

grace
Related discussions
Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
Recent Activity
LIZZIE LOU commented on snow
56 mins ago
Poptarts471 commented on Big News Tomorrow
1 hr ago
snow
2 hrs ago by drifter0213
rooboo Bullet w/ Butterfly Wings
Big News Tomorrow
5 hrs ago by rooboo
Boomer60 joined this community
Welcome them!
20 hrs ago
illadelphia984 added the Pregnancy Tracker
Nov 28
bumps, lumps and rashes
Nov 28 by gracefromHHP
RSS Expert Activity
Prevention Gains Momentum: Your Gui... 
Nov 29 by Lee Kirksey, MD
What You Don't Know About Breathing...
Nov 24 by Steven Y Park, MD
Thanksgiving
Nov 23 by Thomas Dock, Vet. Technician
Community Members