My mother of 79 years with a history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes was refered for a
nuclearNuclear ventriculography stress test for eval. of
ischemiaHepatic ischemia
Ischemic colitis
Mesenteric artery ischemia
Testicular torsion
Vertebrobasilar circulatory disorders. Risk
factorsFactor ix complex:
AvandiaAvandia,
InsulinFood and insulin release
Hypoglycemia
Insulin analog
Insulin aspart
Insulin aspart protamine-insulin aspart
Insulin aspart-insulin aspart protamine
Insulin c-peptide
Insulin detemir
Insulin glargine
Insulin glulisine
Insulin inhalation, rapid acting,
Prandin, Lipidor, Torsemide, Asa, & Cosar.
The results included...
MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION SCAN: Small inferior defect of mild intensity post excersise with normal perfusion images at rest. The left ventricle was of normal size. There was no transient ischemic dilation.
GATED WALL MOTION- Normal left ventricular wall motion.
EJECTION FRACTION: 83%
CONCLUSION: Abnormal exercise myocardial perfusion imaging with evidence of inferior ischemia. EKG response was ischemic. Blood pressure was appropriate. Exercise tolerance was fair. Gated wall motion analysis of the left ventricle reveals Normal left ventricular wall motion and ejection fraction of 83%.
QUESTION: How concerned should she be and what exactly does this report mean? She is sleepless while awaiting an appointment to discuss these findings with the cardiologist. Chest pain upon mild exercise was the impetus for the test.