Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum. ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
lung nodule size
by nyi19, Nov 11, 2007 09:05PM
On a recent cat scan a lung nodule was found to be approx. 1cm. The sr recommended follow up with a PET scan- howver the insurance company won't aporve it until the nodule is larger.
At what size is a PET scan useful? At what size is it warranted? If I get the PET scan now at 1cm will it be useful and able to give more information?
At what size is a PET scan useful? At what size is it warranted? If I get the PET scan now at 1cm will it be useful and able to give more information?
Related discussions
-
Positive PET lung scan (1 replies):Dear Dr, my mother aged 71 was found to have a 1.8cm ste...[more]
-
Question On Lung Nodules (2 replies):Hello I am a 30yr old who had an abdominal CT and the do...[more]
-
Pet Scan and Bronchogenic Ca (1 replies):Had Brachy therapy and Laser for Bronchogenic Ca yet Pet...[more]
-
pet scan shows stomach & rectum uptake (2 replies):Recent pet scan shows some changes in the right lung but...[more]
-
CT Scan or Pet Scan (3 replies):Are these the same or are they two different procedures?...[more]
-
CT and PET scan radiation level (3 replies):Recent news report that getting a yearly lung CT scan ma...[more]
-
Lung Nodule and CT/PET Scan (1 replies):My chest x-ray showed a lesion on my right lung on the p...[more]
Post Comment
Related Communities
Recent Videos
Related Expert Forums
Recent Activity
Most Popular Trackers
RSS
Expert Activity
Community Members
Most Viewed Health Pages
Popular Groups
A PET (Positron Emmision Tomography) scan detects the presence of metabolic activity of a lesion.
If a lesion is too small, a PET scan may not pick it up as the level of metabolism is too low. Also, some non-cancer lesions may also be metabolically active, leading to a "false-positive" PET scan.
The exact size of lesion above which PET can give a definitely useful information is not clearly defined.
You may like to read the article (containing medical jargon!) titled: "The Role of PET Scan in Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer " at http://theoncologist.alphamedpress.org/cgi/content/full/9/6/633
'Positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging have been approved for use in the United States for evaluating pulmonary nodules.
Malignant cells have a higher metabolic rate than normal cells; therefore, glucose uptake is higher. Thoracic PET imaging uses the isotope fluorine-18 bound to a glucose analog to make fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Increased FDG uptake is seen in most malignant tumors and is the basis of the PET study used to differentiate malignant from benign nodules.
FDG uptake can be quantified using the standardized uptake ratio (SUR) to normalize measurements for a patient's weight and injected dose of radioisotope. This allows comparison of uptake between different lesions and patients. SURs greater than 2.5 have been used by some as a marker of malignancy.'
You could read more about the condition at the following link -
http://www.emedicine.com/RADIO/topic782.htm
Regards.