Hi there, although contrast is the best way to go, an MRI without contrast could also be helpful in making the case to your insurance to allow another MRI series to be done with contrast.
The MRI w/o contrast won't make a diagnosis inaccurate, it will just make it less than complete as a diagnositic tool. Contrast allows the radiologist to see lesions in a different perspective and helps to determine the age of those lesions and the recent activity levels. Older lesions that wouldn't enhance with contrast may or may not still be visible, depending on how well your system was able to repair the damaged myelin. I hope this makes sense - I'm a bit slow tonight so please let us know if you need to know more.
Lulu answered your question very well. For sure go ahead with the MRI, as even without contrast it may provide valuable information.
Did the insurance company state why they would not cover contrast? Can this decision be influenced by your GP, neurologist or radiologist? Given that the standard criteria for MRIs for suspected MS includes the use of contrast to detect enhancing lesions, why would this part of the testing not be authorized? As Lulu said, this results in the test being incomplete. Sorry for all the questions, just wanting to understand how this works in the U.S.
Its hard to tell from the letter if the neurologist specifically ordered it without contrast or if this was the insurance company's decision now that I'm looking at the closely. The letter didn't give any reasons why or why not.
I will call my doctors office in the morning to see if I can get an explanation.
Did youget an answer about the contrast from the neurol's office? be sure to check into that before tomorrow and if possible get it added to the orders. That will save you a repeat trip. Good luck and keep us posted, ok? - Lu
I made the mistake of Googling the contrast and saw a bunch of Google PPC ads and links about Gadolinium side effects. I dont even take over the counter drugs (havent in several years) so this will be new for me.
You will find that the chances of having a bad reaction are tiny. A recent huge study showed that only 54 of more than 78,000 people had a problem in this regard. That amounts to less than .0006%. Quix has posted that gadolinium reactions occur almost entirely in people with other previously known conditions, and I think the big one is with the kidneys.
The likelihood of bad gad side effects is way outweighed by the info it can provide in the overwhelming majority of cases. But even if gad isn't administered, it is still worthwhile getting the MRI, as others here have described.
I had my MRI early this morning at 7:30 and my Neurologist office called not too long ago and told me that the preliminary report shows that I do have lesions, but I have a full appointment tomorrow afternoon.
Dear greenand chic, It sure sounds like you are on the fastrack with a dx for MS - please allow yourself some time to process all of this. And then keep us updated - we are here to travel this trip with you. My best, Lulu
I had an incident 4 months ago, since then I have been having terrible headaches. No one cares. The neurologist order an MRI without contract at the same time that he told me that 95 percent of these MRI comes clear. All I want them to know is to find out why I still getting this headaches, dizziness, blurred vision, nombness on the legs and arms sometimes. All they can say is that it will go away. This is not normal for me, still 4 months same symptoms. I think that the MRI is going to be clear like the neurologist said and they are just going to closed my case and leave me like this. Why should I do, when I don't have the power to order and MRI with contrast? I have no idea why this workers comp take so long to be approved and why the doctors miss treat you like they don't care, all they want is to closed the case and leave you sick or they will jsut say" It will go away, that is normal.
Again, this is one Quix could weigh in on, but this is how I understand it.
Everyone is hung up on GAD contrast. It is really good for visualizing blood vessels. That is what it does. Gadolinium is is a rare earth metal with paramagnetic properties (Atomic Number 64). That is where its usefulness with MRI comes in. Its a little technical, but in the PSE (Proton Spin Echo) sequences (really any spin sequences) GAD spins faster and "enhances" more. Abnormal tissues with lots of vasculature "enhance." GAD does not cross an intact blood brain barrier (BBB). Now if the barrier is not intact, like what they think happens when cytokines and other "agents of vascular inflammation" break down the BBB, GAD leaks out out of the vasculature and enhances in tissue. So if a new inflammatory lesion is starting to form, and the BBB is leaking, then GAD is leak across the BBB and light up the lesion. After 4-6 weeks, the lesion is still there are will show up on a T2 PSE, but GAD will no longer leak across the BBB.
Short answer is GAD helps tell is a lesion is less than 6 weeks old, and helps identify brain vasculature, but that is what you get from GAD. Imaging, for lesions older than 6 weeks, don't benefit from GAD. Medical Gadolinium is treated to reduce its toxic effects, but needs to be used with caution in people with impaired renal function.
Demyelination will show on T2 and FLAIR without GAD. That seems to be where most lesions are seen. GAD T2 shows new "Active lesions." At least that is my understanding. My info is pretty much 2nd hand. I used to repair the machines and my knowledge is from talking to the Radiologists, Physicists, Techs and Sales People.
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.