I am going to Ditto what Shell had said.
Come right out and ask! you are your own best advocate and if you do not ask then no one else will. Personally I would not care if they got pissed at me for asking or not.
that's your right to know that things are being done correctly. It's YOUR health at stake here, Not theres......Just a 9 - 5 to them
keep us posted. Have a good weekend :)
~Tonya
Ooops, I meant what Shell said, not ess! Where's my brain today?
thank you for responding.
I am not fired up over this, and I don't feel I am assuming something was done incorrectly.
I just don't understand, if there is a specfic protocol (CMSC 2009 MRI Protocol) to follow, then why don't the MRI facilities follow it? You would think if all Imaging facilities used the same protocols for a specfic DX then comparing past films would be so much easier.
You'll either insult them because they are accredited and pride themselves in proper sequencing to enable the radiologist to see what they need to see.
Or, you'll enlighten them on the fact that you know the protocol.
Or, I just don't know, but you sound fired up over this. Why don't you just ask them what sequences are run for your script? Just a thought. That way you have facts infront of you before assuming something was done incorrectly. Just my opinion...
-shell
No FLAIR sequence on my Brain was performed. just the diffusion weighted and the T1 T2 weighted. Flair is MS protocol for the brain.
No STIR or PD on my spine. A FLAIR was done on the spine....but that is not MS protocol. STIR or PD is MS protocol.
I have the CMSC protocol printed out....Should I take it with and give to the MRI tech?
The protocol I posted (1st post) is what is recommended by the CMSC, not what was done on me.
Hi there,
It does appear the flair imaging was performed from what you document here. To put your mind at ease, flair is performed even when ms protocol is not ordered on the script. So, when if yours was written in this manner, you should be in good shape.
This HP is a review of the protocols written as guidelines:
http://www.medhelp.org/health_pages/Multiple-Sclerosis/MRI-Protocol-Review-2003--2006--2009-Basics---A-Comparative-Look/show/1065?cid=36
Hope this helps,
-Shell
The brain MRI was excellent and he didn't care about the report.
I just got a new 3T brain MRI at another hospital, and the quality is different. There are 4 mm slices with spaces between instead of the 3 mm contiguous slices that there should be. I'll have to look again to see which series were done, but I don't recall seeing the Flair. I didn't see the actual orders, but I know it was for a MS follow-up/new symptom MRI on a 3T machine. The tech asked me what new symptoms I was having.
Previously I've asked to make sure that my MRIs were done according to MS protocol, with 3mm slices, and was told at the teaching hospital that they don't reset the machine; all the MRIs were done with thin slices. The techs are good, but they aren't the radiologists. They just do their jobs as they understand them. Here the radiologist read the MRIs after they're done, when they get to them.
Around here it doesn't seem that the MS protocol is well understood it the imaging facilities I've been to. I hope that my MS specialist will be OK with what I've just had done. It sure looks different from my last 3T! They'll be difficult to compare.
Oh, the whole thing took maybe a half an hour. When they injected the contrast, I was back in the machine in a minute or two. The did two more scans; one for 1 1/2 min, the other for 2 min.
I'm hoping my report will be done today; it will be interesting to see what it says.
It is strange that they did Flair for your spine but not your brain. I think ess is probably right about annoying the radiologist; they're an interesting breed.
You could ask your neurologist to be very specific in writing the orders next time, if he/she will. That way the tech can know ahead of time specifically which series to do, instead of what's standard for that imaging facility.
take care,
Kathy