3.0T MRIs make a difference in spinal imaging, but, in my opinion, they don't make that big a difference in white matter brain imaging, A 3.0T has twice the Larmor frequency of a 1.5T MRI. There is a big difference in the signal to noise ratio in "narrow gradient" environments (like the spine.)
One of the bigger advantages of having the study done at Hartford hospital is that they have some very good nueroradiologists there.
For the most part 1T MRIs are antiquated and may miss a lot of stuff.
I agree that the average 1.5T MRI ahould be fine for picking up lesions in the brain, but your question deals with the spine. Just in case you don't understand the language that Bob uses, here is the reason you want the best MRI machine you can get to (and have paid for, lol).
Certain things make it hard for an MRI to get a clear image and, thus, pick up small lesions. Some of those things are movement and nearness to fluid. The spinal cord is a small amount of tissue surrounded by spinal fluid which has nearly the density of water. All of it is close to water. Thus, the lower power machines with older software, like a 1.0T, get a lot of what we can call "interference" and may miss small lesions.
Also, there is a great deal of movment along the spinal fluid and in the chest. Sources of this movement include the rhythmic pulsations of the spinal fluid itself. Have you ever seen the soft spot on a baby's head pulse with its heartbeat? That's what I am talking about.
Another movement is the pulse within nearby large blood vessels, especially the heart and aorta.
A third source of movement is our breathing. We can't do much about these. That is why we need the best machine available.
You have probably heard my story where I had a spinal MRI on a 1.5T and was told I didn't have MS. No lesions were seen. Three weeks later I had the MRI on a 3.0T and there were 6 (SIX) lesions as clear as day. My diagnosis was made that day (along with lots of symptoms and a positive LP).
So you need a pretty good and up-to-date machine to show the lesions of the spinal cord. Major academic medical centers are more likely to have the better machines AND the better neuroradiologists (the subspecialty of radiology that read the images)
I have another question for you. Do you have symptoms or abnormalities on your neuro exam that suggest or prove spinal lesions? For example do you have incontinence from a neurogenic bladder (as opposed to stress incontinence)? Do you have abnormal deep tendon reflexes that are different on one side versus the other? If so, there is little doubt that you have spinal lesions, no matter what the MRI shows.
In the doc notes he said that M
my clinical exam showed abnormalities consistent with spinal lesions and if I had a spinal lesion he would overwhelmingly say it was ms. My abnormalities were primarily on my left side.
He then sent me for the MRI of brain and spine.
My brain MRI showed over 21 lesions but said they presented as atypical for ms.
The spine MRI showed two slightly bulging discs in the neck.
But there were no lesions. After that he said I was probably didn't have ms but he had no explanation as to what my problem was.
He did say he wanted to keep following my case. I found that odd if he didn't think I had ms.
Either way, after reading the forum for almost a year, i know that I can't just sit around waiting for the doc to say what it is.
That is why I located the 3T machine and asked the question.
Problem is my Medicaid. A lot of doctors don't take it.
I am going to look into it further anyway.
If it is pretty likely that I have a spinal lesion, I will make payment arrangement with the hospital to get the test and pay off the bill.
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.