Hi again,
I posted here a few times before. Sort of stopped coming as regularly trying to pursue a possible psych angle, but it turns out that's kind of a dead end (at least if you actually want to know whether it's physical or psychological). So I was going through my test results and stuff and got my MRI disk out. I'm not totally sure that I've had a correct MRI yet, but thought I would ask to see what you all thought. This is what it says on the disk:
1/16/10 MRI Brain for MS, w/o contrast
4/2/10 MRI Brain and Brain Stem with and w/o contrast
4/20/10 MRI Brain/IAC with and w/o contrast
The first MRI was ordered by my GP/PCP doc. The other two were ordered by the neuro. I knew the one on 4/2 was not for MS. She said it was looking at the area of the trigeminal nerve and its origins to look for problems. (My primary symptom has been facial pain--and it's the only one she seems to believe me about.) But the one on 4/20 I specifically asked her to check for MS since that was my chief concern. To me, the way these titles are written suggests that in fact it wasn't an MRI using the MS protocol.
The question is, does that really matter? I mean, three MRIs you would think it would catch some lesion even if by chance if there were any. Is this just wishful thinking? Should I pursue another MRI? I'm thinking of changing neuros so it might be a good time. I actually really liked my current neuro, but she seems to think anxiety or stress is a major cause of my problems. And I've really tried looking into that, meditation, etc., but symptoms keep coming back. The last time I wrote her an email asking about 1) vitamin supplements and 2) three spots of buzzing on my head and ringing ears, and if that mattered/what to do. She responded to question 1 but complete ignored the other, which kind of makes me think it's time to move on.
Anyway.. thanks for any advice. I've been lurking here and there and my appreciation for this forum just keeps growing. You guys are awesome.