Hey Guys and Dolls
Research about to be puplished, gives clear indication that treating first attack (probable MSers) with DMD's is the better patient out come, than waiting for a second attack and therefore the patients becomes CDMS and dx, before providing DMD treatment.
[Clear-Cut Dose Response
There was also a "very clear-cut" dose response, noted Dr. Freedman. "The MRI data shows that the 3 times weekly dose is significantly better than the once weekly dose, and it was statistically significant and stayed statistically significant even out to 3 years."
The study results prompt the question of whether clinicians should ever wait to initiate treatment if MS is suspected. "The argument has been that these patients only had a first event, that we have to wait for a second event to make sure they really have MS," said Dr. Freedman.
Such a "wait and see" approach would not be used for other patients, he said. "If a patient had a stroke or a transient ischemic attack, would you wait for them to come back with a second one before you offered them something to protect them? That doesn't make any sense."
He added that a second event in MS "can be devastating."
Cost of the treatment could be a factor in the treatment decision, he said. "If this was a little aspirin, nobody would question it."]
If your in the probable MS or CIS catagory or your neuro is holding back DMD's until your next attack, this might be worth reading, printing and handing to your neuro for consideration.
The full article is on medscape you need to join but its free and its well worth being a member because you get to read exactly what your dr's do and you get read all the latest research coming out.
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/762405?sssdmh=dm1.777663&src=nldne
Cheers........JJ