I posted this originally in a different question directed at definitely dx'd, but am interested in other responses. Who out there has had experiences where the radiologist reads mri as one thing, and then the MS neurologist reading it totally different.
7/31 radiologist said consider MS...1st nuero said there were old lesions and it was a demlylenting disease but not comfortable saying definite MS...probably MS 2nd neuro at MS clinic said not MS, normal MRI did order repeat MRI
9/09 2ND MRI can't rule out demylenating disease, abnormal MRI....2nd neuro MS clinic, resident said pretty normal....head of dept said normal...but did say we are going to find out what this is.
Did you have the same experience?
Who do you believe. If the neuro is always right why have a radiologist read the images? I hope someone can answer that question.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.