Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
 | 

Headaches and Lump on Temple

by twoplustwo, Nov 09, 2009 11:23PM
I am a 21 year old male. I recently had some trauma to my right temple. I had no pain in the area untill 4 days later, I had flu like symptoms for 2 days and started to get headaches (pressure and tension in both of my temples). I also noticed a small pulsing lump in the area. (I rarely had headaches before this)

After 3 days with terrible headaches I visited the ER and had blood work and a CT scan done. Both came back negative. The doctor initially thought that it was bruising realted to the trauma but had me return the next day for an ultrasound.

The doctors told me that the ultrasound showed damage to an artery in my temple. (Could a trauma to the artery show simmilar symptoms to temporal arteritis?)
I was also told that being so young, temporal arteritis was not the cause of the lump and my headaches. That I need not worry about this effecting my vision.

A week after the onset of my symptoms, the headaches are no longer as severe, though I still have slight pain in my right temple, and feel pressure on them from time to time. The artery is still large and visible on the side of my head.

I am wondering if I should have a biopsy done on the artery.
At my age is there even a remote chance that temporal arteritis is the cause of this? Would the possibility of me having GCA come back in blood tests? (I have no previous illnesses that relate to GCA)

I have not had any problems with vision, but if GCA is a posibility I would like to be safe and have a biopsy done (this was not recommended by the doctor in the ER)

It will be atleast a week before I can get an appointment with my doctor, and then more time to have a visit for a biopsy if needed. I understand that time for treatment is an important factor with GCA, would 3 weeks from the onset of symptoms be too long to wait?

Thanks for your time.




Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
Recent Activity
daddyslittlegirl54 commented on Head Vibes
15 mins ago
rudyhorse is sad, she couldn't go to her son's wrestling match ton...
daddyslittlegirl54 a little scared
Prospero73 commented on Tramadol & Ultram...
56 mins ago
selmaS Merry Christmas and Happy & Healthy New Year !!! : D
forget_me_not commented on Tramadol & Ultram...
1 hr ago
EmilyPost commented on Tramadol & Ultram...
3 hrs ago
Tramadol & Ultram Recovery Room...
3 hrs ago by EmilyPost
RSS Expert Activity
EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH TO NEUTER S...
8 hrs ago by Arnold L Goldman, D.V.M.
HOW DO/SHOULD DOCTORS THINK ABOUT T...
8 hrs ago by Arnold L Goldman, D.V.M.
Simple tool to Assess your Risk for...
Dec 14 by Lee Kirksey, MD
Community Members