My 81-year old mother was diagnosed in April with a meningioma, discovered during evaluation of an unrelated
earEar barotrauma
Ear discharge
Ear emergencies
Ear examination
Ear tube insertion
Ear tube insertion - series problem. A follow-up MRI in July showed no significant change. It's a 4 x 4 x 3.5cm
extraExtra strength mylanta calci tabs
Extra strength pain relief-axial lesion in the right frontal lobe. There is a cerebral spinal fluid collection between the mass and the frontal lobe, and there is a relatively broad base of the mass adjacent to the right frontal bone. There is no significant edema surrounding the mass. The
ventriclesUltrasound, normal fetus - ventricles of brain
Ultrasound, normal fetus- ventricles of brain are
normalNormal saline flush in size and there is no evidence of
hydrocephalusHydrocephalus. The paranasal sinuses appear relatively
clearClear by design
Clear eyes
Clear eyes acr
Clear eyes clr
Clear-atadine
Clear-atadine children's. No significant cerebellar tonsillar ectopia was identified. An EEG taken in May was normal.
She is, and always has been, asymptomatic. She is in good health, active, happy, and enjoying life.
In addition to continued observation, a neurosurgeon recommended that she start on divalproex 500mg bid as a prophylactic anticonvulsant. Her neurologist initially stated that she didn't need this, but then changed his mind in the middle of the conversation and agreed with the recommendation. (Leaving her a bit confused, I'm afraid.) I've read the abstract from the study conducted by Glantz et. al. at Brown, which notes that "prophylactic anticonvulsants are widely advocated despite a lack of convincing evidence of their efficacy in preventing first seizures." (Neurology; VOL 46, ISS 4, 1996, pp 985-91.) Their hypothesis that such treatment provides a reduction in the frequency of first seizure was actually rejected by the results of the study, and they concluded that "anticonvulsant prophylaxis with divalproex sodium is not indicated for patients with brain tumors who have not had seizures."
My primary question is with the respect to the advisability/necessity of starting on the divalproex. It's not clear to us that there is a really a compelling reason for it.
Secondly, could you comment on the decision to observe the mass at this time, as opposed to surgery.
Thanks very much.