My husband was just told by a neurosurgeon that his brain tumor from 21 years ago (he had one when he was only 7) has grown back. He had a grade II
cerebellarAcute cerebellar ataxia astrocytoma that was mostly removed with surgery and then he had
radiationCystitis - noninfectious
Radiation therapy therapy. After the
radiationCystitis - noninfectious
Radiation therapy therapy, the tumor was completely gone. Then six years ago, an area of abnormality showed up on an MRI in the same location of the previous tumor. They said that it was due to surgical defects from the previous
resectionEye muscle repair
Large bowel resection
Large bowel resection - series
Prostate removal
Small bowel resection
Small bowel resection - series. He continued to have MRI's about every year and they all said the abnormality was either encephalomalacia, gliosis, or that it was from the
radiationCystitis - noninfectious
Radiation therapy therapy. But just 1 month ago, an MRI showed that the mass had grown and is now putting
pressurePressure ulcer on the 4th ventricle so the surgeon said the only thing to do is take it out. I am just wondering why ALL of the radiologists who performed the MRI's always said in their impressions that--no recurrent tumor is identified--when the surgeon looks right at us and says--your tumor is back? Is it okay to have a second crainiotomy? And is it okay to have radiation again if you had it 20 years before? We are scheduled for the surgery but any answers would be great! Thanks!
Years ago, I had an MRI for a suspected disc herniation. Radiologist said no hernia at L5-S1, but minor bulging at another site.
Still having the pain, so I brought THOSE MRI films to a neurosurgeon, who saw the herniation in about 2 seconds. A big one.
Had surgery and was eventually ok.
So sometimes I wonder about radiologists interpretations of MRI's. I'm getting another one next week for headaches, and you can bet I'm taking the films to the neuro guy to review.
Good luck, and I wish you well with your situation.