Dear Geej:
Sorry to hear about your cousin's child. Actually, the difference between a stroke and
shakenShaken baby syndrome baby syndrome is distinct enough that it would likely not be mixed up. A stroke could not give a baby retinal findings, as these only occur through trauma. This would be especially true if there was evidence from previous broken bones or bruises in areas not exposed to trauma.
Sincerely,
CCF Neuro MD
what is the differential diagnosis of the retinal findings, in the absence of previous broken bones or bruises? just curious.
i know that sometimes bleeding disorders can present in much the same way as physical abuse because of the bruising. but are there conditions which mimic the retinal findings in shaken baby syndrome?
thanks for this wonderful forum
carlos from kansas
what is the differential diagnosis of the retinal findings, in the absence of previous broken bones or bruises? just curious.
i know that sometimes bleeding disorders can present in much the same way as physical abuse because of the bruising. but are there conditions which mimic the retinal findings in shaken baby syndrome?
thanks for this wonderful forum
carlos from kansas
Actually the only differential diagnosis is accidental injury and rotational forces they incur. The retinal and optic nerve sheath hemorrhages are not found in stroke.
CCF Neuro MD
Actually the only differential diagnosis is accidental injury and rotational forces they incur. The retinal and optic nerve sheath hemorrhages are not found in stroke.
CCF Neuro MD
I also wonder whether the baby should be checked for a bleeding disorder or for juvenile macular degeneration (congenital). Perhaps there is something going on here besides shaken baby syndrome. As well as an attorney, I think your cousin should try to consult a leading pediatric neuro-opthalmologist and perhaps a hematologist. Good luck!