Our son (7 years old at the time) had a possible stroke in November 2000, but too many doctors, many opinions...we were left out in the cold (information wise). This past week, we had a neurology appointment to discuss our son’s well being. We're military, so continuity of care or even meeting with a neurologist is rare.
'Fellow' stated that some of the doctors believe our son had a stroke, but some did not. There was a
dopplerDoppler ultrasonography of an extremity
Doppler ultrasound exam of an arm or leg
Duplex/doppler ultrasound test
Echocardiogram study done that showed blood
clotsBlood clots bouncing back and forth in the heart, but not going to the lungs at all. A hole in the heart was ruled out by a cardiologist.
'Fellow' says this is the reason that some of the docs don't believe it was a stroke. The impression is typed below, but can someone explain this to me in English, layman terms. This is an "impression" (what the document states-not me being mean) after one of our son's CAT scan.
::8 September 05-Interpretation: A single focus of cortical signal abnormality ::in the high
anteriorAnterior cruciate ligament (acl) injury
Anterior knee pain
Anterior vaginal wall repair, medial right frontal lobe, adjacent to the ::interhemispheric
fissureAnal fissure, measuring 5 mm in size. No change from 11/22/00. ::This could represent an old area of
ischemicHepatic ischemia
Ischemic colitis
Stroke
Transient ischemic attack
Transient ischemic attack (tia) change, although the appearance ::is not that of encephalomalacia. A cortical neoplastic or dysplastic focus is ::possible.