685?1277859592
News from the past to the future to share and discuss User Group
JOBS ACT NOT WORKING
About This Group:

Do you have any kind of news--old or new or growing old that you want to share? Do you want to discuss issues that are of concern in the news? Do you want to share a perspective on how things are going in our Country, another country? This group is for covering the whole wide world because everyone is equally important whether we agree or disagree with their beliefs. The news can include information you want to share that you consider "news" worthy. If we do quote a news source, let's try to use a legitimate one. No extreme, shock journalism please.

Founded by Dazon50 on June 29, 2010
53 members
Font Size:
A
A
A
Background:
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank Blank

JOBS ACT NOT WORKING

Huffington Post has big headline---  Jobs Act not working and falling short of all of its 'grand' promises.


When lawmakers unveiled the carefully named Jobs Act a year ago, backers expected it to get caught up in the typical grind of Capitol Hill: vigorous debate followed by a long wait for a vote that might never happen.

Instead, the legislation sailed through — perhaps too fast. Even supporters say they expected more time to work out the kinks in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, which aimed to help small, private firms raise money and grow so they could hire more workers.



Graphic




Interactive: Explore how Congress voted on the JOBS Act.




More business news

Black liquor measure fails in Md. House panel


Steven Mufson

Bill to roll back payments to paper companies burning a pulping residue known as black liquor fails by a vote.




IMF’s initial public statements on Cyprus clashed with private doubts


Howard Schneider

The fund endorsed a broad deposit tax in public, but feared what it might mean in practice.




LivingSocial co-founder leaving the company


Thomas Heath

The daily-deal company has struggled financially in the turbulent and crowded market.



More business news



.

Now, nearly a year after its enactment, major portions of the act are in limbo, and other parts have failed to measure up to the grandiose job-creation promises.

The act underscores how difficult it can be for Washington to spur job creation, even when there’s strong bipartisan consensus on a plan. President Obama hailed it in a Rose Garden ceremony as “exactly the kind of bipartisan action needed” to help the economy. Republicans claimed it as their own. The measure came together months before last year’s election, making it politically difficult to resist a proposal that promised to yield jobs.

“It was a short-lived, political fad,” said Simon Johnson, a professor of entrepreneurship at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “There was this combination of wanting to look busy and wanting to create jobs, and skeptics like me never thought it would do anything good.”

The measure is a grab bag of ideas cobbled together for greater impact. It allows private firms to raise money by advertising to the general public for the first time in decades, raise up to $1 million in capital from investors via the Internet, and temporarily skirt some of the federal disclosure and accounting rules as they go public.

The legislation was built on the premise that regulation constrains the growth of small businesses and their potential for explosive job growth — an assertion that has been hotly debated by economists for decades.

But with unemployment high and an election looming, lawmakers hastily introduced the Jobs Act in December 2011, and it got a thumbs-up from the president.

The measure passed the House with an overwhelming majority three months later. Many who were tracking the bill, including its supporters, expected more scrutiny in the Senate. But it whizzed through that chamber, too, in part because Democrats who were skeptical about the measure were reluctant to break ranks with Obama.

“Once the White House endorsed the measure, it was a speeding train coming through the Senate,” said a Senate staff member who is not authorized to speak publicly on the issue and whose boss supported the Jobs Act. “It gained momentum very quickly after that even though some of us felt there was room for improvement.”

Obama signed the bill April 5, four months after its introduction — record speed by Washington standards. The result, critics say, are laws fraught with risks to investors.

A group of investor advocates, shocked by the swift action, went to Capitol Hill to follow up, said Lynn Turner, a former chief accountant at the Securities and Exchange Commission who took part in the meetings. The group asked one senior Senate staff member how lawmakers would track the number of jobs created by the measure.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/
3 Comments
Blank
973741_tn?1342346373
Sorry that copied funny.  Good read if you want to google the title and huffington post.  Another Obama fail?  Sounds like it.  
Blank
Avatar_m_tn
We can only hope so.
Blank
Avatar_m_tn
"Republicans claimed it as their own."  

That claims states it all... how was it ever going to work if the Republicans had anything to do with it?
Blank
Recent Activity
973741_tn?1342346373
Blank
specialmom commented on skepticalpeach's status
1 hr ago
973741_tn?1342346373
Blank
specialmom commented on AnnieBrooke's status
1 hr ago
649848_tn?1357751184
Blank
Barb135 commented on Barb135's status
15 hrs ago
MedHelp Health Answers