Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum. ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
I can understand your problem well.
Total knee arthroplasty is successful in degenerative, arthritic or injured joints.
The reasons for the revisions included polyethylene wear and osteolysis, aseptic loosening and infection.
An inflammatory process at the bone/cement or bone/prosthesis interface leads to a severe osteolysis
What has been the indication for knee replacement?
What has been your complication?
To be specific- has it been any one of these?
The most important long term complication seems to be aseptic loosening.
Although early diagnosis is very important the standard techniques often fail Tibial bone loss is frequently encountered at the time of revision total knee arthroplasty, and the outcome of the revision often depends on the management of this bone deficiency. Structural allograft provides a stable and durable reconstruction of a tibial bone deficiency.
Revision total knee arthroplasty is done to alleviate pain and improve function. Contraindications for revision total knee arthroplasty include persistent infection, poor bone quality, highly limited quadriceps or extensor function, poor skin coverage, and poor vascular status. Results are not as good as with primary total knee arthroplasty; outcomes are better for aseptic loosening than for infections. Failed revisions require a salvage procedure (resection of arthroplasty, arthrodesis, or amputation), with inferior results compared with revision total knee arthroplasty
For further guidance and support you can consult, Dr Engh GA & Dr at Ammeen DJ. Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute, 2501 Parker's Lane, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22306, USA.
I can understand your problem well.
Total knee arthroplasty is successful in degenerative, arthritic or injured joints.
The reasons for the revisions included polyethylene wear and osteolysis, aseptic loosening and infection.
An inflammatory process at the bone/cement or bone/prosthesis interface leads to a severe osteolysis
What has been the indication for knee replacement?
What has been your complication?
To be specific- has it been any one of these?
The most important long term complication seems to be aseptic loosening.
Although early diagnosis is very important the standard techniques often fail Tibial bone loss is frequently encountered at the time of revision total knee arthroplasty, and the outcome of the revision often depends on the management of this bone deficiency. Structural allograft provides a stable and durable reconstruction of a tibial bone deficiency.
Revision total knee arthroplasty is done to alleviate pain and improve function. Contraindications for revision total knee arthroplasty include persistent infection, poor bone quality, highly limited quadriceps or extensor function, poor skin coverage, and poor vascular status. Results are not as good as with primary total knee arthroplasty; outcomes are better for aseptic loosening than for infections. Failed revisions require a salvage procedure (resection of arthroplasty, arthrodesis, or amputation), with inferior results compared with revision total knee arthroplasty
For further guidance and support you can consult, Dr Engh GA & Dr at Ammeen DJ. Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute, 2501 Parker's Lane, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22306, USA.
Best,
Take care