Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum. ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
This patient support community is for discussions relating to ovarian cancer, biopsy, chemotherapy, clinical trials, genetics, hysterectomy, immunotherapy, radiation therapy, screening, and staging.
Wow...her cancer is quite punctual! November 2007, 2008, 2009, with 80 each time? How weird!
I currently have a rising marker we are keeping an eye on and my oncologist also said that they are no longer treating the marker, but either symptoms or findings on a scan. So keeping an eye on the marker on a monthly basis and ordering another scan at some point seems like an acceptable approach. Having said that, if the insurance covers it I would ask for a PET/CT which is superior to the CT in showing cancer activity.
From what I understand they retreat with carbo/taxol if there has been a year of remission. I am a little surprised to see that they treated her second recurrence with the same mix without adding a different drug to it, but I am not an oncologist. She responded fairly well each time.
I was also diagnosed and treated in 2005, this will be my first recurrence, if confirmed. A few things have changed since 2005/2006: My clinic now administers the carbo/taxol once a week for 16 weeks, instead of every three weeks. The taxol is supposed to be more effective this way, and the side effects, per chemo nurse, not as bad. Also, Avastin is a new drug trials for which have just been wrapped up and it is pending FDA approval in 2010 - it is already available though, as I have heard many ladies are on it. If added to a chemo regimen, it is supposed to enhance the effect and lead to a longer remission. In fact, carbo/taxol/avastin is supposed to become the new "golden standard" of treatment in 2011. You may want to ask about it.
I currently have a rising marker we are keeping an eye on and my oncologist also said that they are no longer treating the marker, but either symptoms or findings on a scan. So keeping an eye on the marker on a monthly basis and ordering another scan at some point seems like an acceptable approach. Having said that, if the insurance covers it I would ask for a PET/CT which is superior to the CT in showing cancer activity.
From what I understand they retreat with carbo/taxol if there has been a year of remission. I am a little surprised to see that they treated her second recurrence with the same mix without adding a different drug to it, but I am not an oncologist. She responded fairly well each time.
I was also diagnosed and treated in 2005, this will be my first recurrence, if confirmed. A few things have changed since 2005/2006: My clinic now administers the carbo/taxol once a week for 16 weeks, instead of every three weeks. The taxol is supposed to be more effective this way, and the side effects, per chemo nurse, not as bad. Also, Avastin is a new drug trials for which have just been wrapped up and it is pending FDA approval in 2010 - it is already available though, as I have heard many ladies are on it. If added to a chemo regimen, it is supposed to enhance the effect and lead to a longer remission. In fact, carbo/taxol/avastin is supposed to become the new "golden standard" of treatment in 2011. You may want to ask about it.
Best of luck!