My neice has a congenital heart defects. She is two months old right now. Her condition has not been diagnosed fully as the doctors are waiting for a MRI to get a 3-d imagine. However we do know that she has TGA with two large VSD and plumonary artesia. She was symptom free for the first two months but on her last checkup her saturation levels dropped and she started having a few spells. The medication given to her did not help and she just had her BT shunt procedure from which she is recovering well.
Her doctor has said that there are three options for correction: double switch, don't know the name of the second procedure but basically they don't switch the ventricles but close the VSD and do correct other problems or fontan. They have indicated that due to the size of her VSD she may need a fontan but they cant confirm without MRI.
What I want to know that if the doctors decide to go the fontan route should we get a second opinion?
Secondly what will her life be with fontan. I have heard mixed reviewed where some people say that life can be good and fontan can last for years where as some ppl say that you need a heart transplant. Do all patients with fontan procedure need a heart transplant? What is the % that do? Can she expected to have a good quality of life is she has a fontan?
Without evaluating her, I cannot say at all which would be the best option for her cardiac status. I can say that, although the Fontan has been lifesaving for babies and children, and allowed them to reach adulthood, it is not a perfect solution. There are many long term problems with it, including the ability to maintain the appropriate physiology necessary from a cardiopulmonary standpoint as well as intestinal and liver problems and endocrine problems. Many of these children do end up with cardiac transplants.
If the decision is to get a Fontan, I would definitely get a second opinion. However, with pulmonary atresia, it may be difficult to get a two ventricular repair out of her cardiac anatomy, especially if there is concern that one of the ventricles is inadequate.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. MedHelp is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.