I am asking this question about my 21 year old daughter. She has been diagnosed with SVT since 2005 and the arrythmia has been very difficult to control. She has taken inderal, metoprolol and bystolic in the past and none have stopped the arrythmia. She was referred to a cardiologist a couple years ago, and she is currently taking cardizem and atenolol. The dosages of these two drugs had to be increased several times to get the arrthymia under control. And even though her heart is now in a normal sinus rhythm, she still has a heart rate around 90-100 bpm.She is fatigued from the meds and from the tachycardia and palpitations. We asked the cardiologist if an ablation would be a possibility for her, and he said no, because doing an ablation of the sinus node could be risky and if too much of the sinus node were burned, she could become pacemaker dependent for the rest of her life. I have read that EP studies and ablations have had very high success rates in curing SVT, and if she could be cured it would greatly improve her quality of life. I am wondering if what her cardiologist said about the ablation is actually true, or should we get another opinion ? what do you think about this ???
Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) occurs when there is more than one electrical connection between the top and the bottom of the heart. Ordinarily, electricity arises in the sinus node, the natural pacemaker of the heart, in the top right-hand corner of the heart. It spreads across the atria, the upper chambers, like a wave. It then comes to the center of the heart and is conducted to the lower chambers, the ventricles, through a single wire, the atrioventricular (A-V) node. In SVT, electricity goes down the A-V node, comes back up the extra “wire,” and then returns back down the A-V node, continuing in a circle really quickly. Your daughter was born with this extra pathway, although her SVT didn’t make itself apparent until she was 16; this is actually fairly common. Unfortunately, the likelihood of the SVT spontaneously resolving at this age is essentially zero.
There are many medications that can be used to manage SVT. Without having your daughter’s full information, I cannot say for sure, but with the medications that you list, it appears that the only medications that have been used are beta-blockers. Some of the side effects of these medications include exercise intolerance and fatigue. However, there are numerous other medications that use different arrhythmia controlling mechanisms BESIDES beta-blockers.
That said, electrophysiology study with radiofrequency ablation is a highly successful intervention. This is a special cardiac catheterization, in which several catheters with electrodes on their tips are placed in the heart by way of the veins. These catheters are put in strategic positions in the heart and electrically map the heart, which can then find the extra pathway. Then an ablation catheter is placed on the extra pathway and, depending on technique, can either be burned or frozen, destroying (ablating) the pathway. The electrical mapping is then repeated to ensure that there are no other pathways and to demonstrate resolution of the first extra pathway. The success rate is approximately 95%, depending on the location of the pathway, with complication rates less than 3%. Using freezing techniques, the complication rate can be less than 1%. Often the pathway is very near, or part of, the A-V (not the sinus) node. One of the concerns about ablating near the A-V node is heart block, in which a pacemaker would be needed lifelong. However, depending on its location, the pathway can be safely ablated, or at least modified so that it doesn’t work well, with freezing. Electrophysiologists, the specialized cardiologists who perform these procedures, are quite used to dealing with this risk assessment, and would elect to not perform the ablation if it put the A-V node at too high a risk. Permanent A-V block is a small risk, but this risk is typically mitigated by the experience of the operator.
Overall, based on what you are telling me, it sounds as if she should be evaluated by an electrophysiologist, if she isn’t already. As you have heard, if she were to have an ablation, this would cure her, so it is worthwhile to look into this. If she is already seeing an electrophysiologist who is treating her with beta-blockers alone and you are not satisfied with the outcome or the information that you are being given, I would recommend that you obtain a second opinion.
I would get a second opinion if I were you. I have never heard anything about an ablation procedure being "risky" except in atrial flutter patients. I have SVT, although not as frequently as your poor daughter, and have recently been looking into the procedure. Good luck!!
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. MedHelp is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.