Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum. ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
Why was my friend advised to terminate her pregnancy due to HydrocephalusHydrocephalus and could the baby have suffered? She was37 weeks pregnant and it was diagnosed a week ago.
Hydrocephalus is usually due to blockage of CSF outflow in the ventricles or in the subarachnoid space over the brain. In a person without hydrocephalus, CSF continuously circulates through the brain, its ventricles and the spinal cord and is continuously drained away into the circulatory system. Alternatively, the condition may result from an overproduction of the CSF fluid, from a congenital malformation blocking normal drainage of the fluid, or from complications of head injuries or infections.
Regardless of cause, the fluid accumulates in the ventricles. Compression of the brain by the accumulating fluid eventually may cause convulsions and mental retardation. Fetuses, infants, and young children with hydrocephalus typically have an abnormally large head, excluding the face, because the pressure of the fluid causes the individual skull bones — which have yet to fuse — to bulge outward at their juncture points. Another medical sign, in infants, is a characteristic fixed downward gaze with whites of the eyes showing above the iris, as though the infant were trying to examine its own lower eyelids.[2] Hydrocephalus occurs in about one out of every 500 live births[3] and was routinely fatal until surgical techniques for shunting the excess fluid out of the central nervous system and into the blood or abdomen were developed. Hydrocephalus is detectable during prenatal ultrasound examinations.
This is from Wikipedia. Her Doctors may have advised her because of the severity of the condition, she does not have to do it if she doesn't want to but it could have led to major complications or even death in early infancy.
Like Mumita said, they can't make her do anything that she doesn't want to do HOWEVER I am under the impression that babies born with this condition have no chance of survival. They might be born alive but they would not survive for long.
i work with a child who has hydrocephalus. i don't know if he was born with it or if it was a result of him being a preemie. either way, he has had it all of his life. he is now 5. he has a shunt and is otherwise a very typical boy, except he is extremely bright.
that is my only experience with hydrocephalus. this case of course may be different. but to recommend termination at 37 weeks? is that possible? they may schedule a c-section due to complications, but termination implies ending the pregnancy with the purpose of killing the baby.
mumita's article states it occurs in 1 in every 500 live births, and prior to surgical intervention (shunts i assume) it was fatal.
Not all babies die from this. It is important, if your friend hasn't terminated already, to get more information and make an informed decision.
It might be better for her to birth the baby and get to hold them as long as they do live, if their case is so severe that they would die. They'd have at least that little time with them.
Some of the comments on here are so misinformed that it is absolutely sickening. My daughter was diagnosed with hydro when I was 32 weeks pregnant with her. I would have NEVER considered an abortion, that is just plain ridiculous. Hydrocephalus can cause varying degrees of problems in different people, but most are doing just fine, thank you very much. My daughter is almost three and has been perfectly healthy, happy, and extremely intelligent since birth. She was shunted at 2 days old and has not had a surgery since. People who reply to posts on here really need to get more informed, geez...
If she is 37w I'm pretty sure it's illegal to terminate this late. The best option she'd have would be to wait it out, give birth and possibly consider the option of adoption if the little one survives and caring for the child is too tough.
I also have to say this - you should accept your child however they are born, disabilities, no disabilities, whatever. My husband and I were fully prepared to love and care for our daughter, no matter how disabled she was. All children are a gift from God and come to us for a reason. Every child has the right to live as given to them by God - that choice should not be in human hands. I really hope your friend did not terminate this pregnancy. That would be so horrible and cruel, it makes me extremely sad and worried to even think of something like that happening.
tommikat is right however in alot of cases there is more severe side affects, I have a pt. who is 30 yrs old, who was born with Hydro, he has had several shunts, and several shunt failures he and his parent have struggled and dealt with all obsticles thrown his way, he also has daily seizures all varying in severeity. So depending on the case I would say all outcomes would be different.
BUT I do agree Love your children whatever and however they are given to you.
I know many people with hydrocephalus since I work with individuals with special needs. Hydro can be associated with spinabiffida (sp?) but can also occur on its own. The degree of disability runs from none at all to fairly severe (although none of the people I know/ work with that have hydro are severely developmentally delayed) Most of the people I know/ work with that have hydro are of "normal" intelligence. It does make me very sad to hear that so many people are misinformed about this condition. Due to shunts hydrocephalus is rarely fatal.
Ummm... my aunt has hydrocephalus and is fine! She has a slightly larger proportioned head, but she is mentally "normal". She does have some complications from it, but by no means anything serious. Because of the added pressure to her brain, she is at a higher risk of stroke (which she just had a MINOR stroke a few months ago). She is 58 years old and this is the first complication from her condition. Obviously the serverity of the condition is what really determains the "special needs" of the person, but like I said... she is completely "normal" mentally. ;)
Hydrocephalus is usually due to blockage of CSF outflow in the ventricles or in the subarachnoid space over the brain. In a person without hydrocephalus, CSF continuously circulates through the brain, its ventricles and the spinal cord and is continuously drained away into the circulatory system. Alternatively, the condition may result from an overproduction of the CSF fluid, from a congenital malformation blocking normal drainage of the fluid, or from complications of head injuries or infections.
Regardless of cause, the fluid accumulates in the ventricles. Compression of the brain by the accumulating fluid eventually may cause convulsions and mental retardation. Fetuses, infants, and young children with hydrocephalus typically have an abnormally large head, excluding the face, because the pressure of the fluid causes the individual skull bones — which have yet to fuse — to bulge outward at their juncture points. Another medical sign, in infants, is a characteristic fixed downward gaze with whites of the eyes showing above the iris, as though the infant were trying to examine its own lower eyelids.[2] Hydrocephalus occurs in about one out of every 500 live births[3] and was routinely fatal until surgical techniques for shunting the excess fluid out of the central nervous system and into the blood or abdomen were developed. Hydrocephalus is detectable during prenatal ultrasound examinations.
This is from Wikipedia. Her Doctors may have advised her because of the severity of the condition, she does not have to do it if she doesn't want to but it could have led to major complications or even death in early infancy.
that is my only experience with hydrocephalus. this case of course may be different. but to recommend termination at 37 weeks? is that possible? they may schedule a c-section due to complications, but termination implies ending the pregnancy with the purpose of killing the baby.
mumita's article states it occurs in 1 in every 500 live births, and prior to surgical intervention (shunts i assume) it was fatal.
It might be better for her to birth the baby and get to hold them as long as they do live, if their case is so severe that they would die. They'd have at least that little time with them.
BUT I do agree Love your children whatever and however they are given to you.