Nutrition Health Chat: Tuesday, Dec. 8th, 5-6 PM Eastern. Learn how vitamins, minerals, and phytonutrients affect your health. Free live Q&A. Join us!
Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
 | 

This makes lots of sense

by mia12366, May 28, 2009 01:25PM
This starting to make sense to me.

Are Doctors Causing Infant Brain Damage by Clamping the Umbilical Cord Prematurely?
Newborn lungs exist in a "compacted state" suitable for the womb. When the infant is born, the placenta and cord pulse for up to 20 minutes, delivering a burst of blood volume to the infant's system. This blood burst is just what is needed for the lungs of the newborn to expand.

Unfortunately, many hospitals and doctors don't understand the mechanics of this and are engaging in early umbilical cord clamping -- often within one minute of birth.

Without the burst of blood from the placenta, the infant suffers a drop in blood pressure as its lungs fail to open as they should, creating a chain reaction of effects that can include brain damage and lung damage. Immediate cord clamping can cause hypotension, hypovolemia and infant anemia, resulting in cognitive deficits. Some have even theorized that the rise in autism could be linked at least in part to early cord clamping.

If every woman would ask the doctors to wait before they clamp the cord??? it would reduce some troubles for sure.
True very true.
Member Comments (3)

by Linzola1, May 28, 2009 04:42PM
thats intresting! Where did you get this info? I am very intrested!

by mia12366, Jun 04, 2009 08:13PM
To: Linzola 1
I subscribe to many different websites and now I don't remember where this one came from.
Please try to Google the subject and I am sure you will get many different websites to read from.
I also posted on the forum  pregnancies 35+  and there are ladies who heard about this and one said that her doctor told her same. So it is not a hoax.
Take care, Mia.

by chantal21, Jun 04, 2009 08:25PM
I agree, unless the circumstance calls for cutting the cord immediately (in an emergency), that it should not be cut for some time. My midwife has told me this and I found it very interesting! When my son was born he was immediately place on me and left there for quite a while. I can't seem to remember the time frame right now maybe 5-10 min.? It would have been longer, but I started bleeding pretty bad and my midwife needed to stop it quickly. I gave birth in a birthing center, so it was a more laxed environment and I was able to make decisions in certain situations. Anyway, I do believe it is best for baby to let the blood pulse through for some time after birth.
Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
Recent Activity
chantal21 still trying to get bile to flow for Jesse,,,,4 weeks po...
ladybug82 commented on sicker than a dog
25 mins ago
scorpiogirl32 commented on photo
27 mins ago
mira447 plans to attend the Health Chat: How To Eat Healthier: The Role of Vitamins, Minerals and Phytonutrients
Eirlis joined this community
Welcome them!
1 hr ago
tarrah87 not feeling well today
Ready_4_Baby_2 uploaded a new photo
2 hrs ago
isthisnormal I don't know how much more of this I can take. :(
RSS Expert Activity
What You Can Learn From Tiger Woods...
15 hrs ago by Steven Y Park, MD
When the Mexican Drug Trade Hits th...
Dec 03 by Arnold L Goldman, D.V.M.
In the ER: Coffee, anyone?
Dec 02 by Jon Geller, D.V.M.
Community Members